WAYS OF INTERPRETING MYTHS Flashcards

1
Q

Theories of myth interpretation may be roughly divided into two major groupings: ​

literal and symbolic.​

A

ALAN DUNDES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

a myth may have different emphases or levels of meaning.” Since it often serves more than one purpose, “a tale about human actions [can] contain more than a single aspect and implication” (39)

A

G.S KIRK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ften books on mythology conveniently forget that myth stories were once all believed to be “true” (in some sense). The problem arises when we try to figure out in what sense. Because belief is often so personal and individual.

A

AS A BELIEF SYSTEM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Early philosophers tried to rationalize the fantastic events in myth by claiming that they were distortions of historical fact. One of these fellows was a Greek named Euhemerus (c. 300 BC), who gave his name to any theory that claims that the gods were originally historical heroes who were later deified. ​

A

AS DISGUISED HISTORY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

states that the allegorizing of myth “was in harmony with one of the basic characteristics of Greek religious thought: the belief that the gods express themselves in cryptic form–in oracles, in mysteries” (205).

A

ERNST ROBERT CURTIUS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Early philosophers were also disturbed by the seemingly immoral or amoral actions of their gods. The Greek philosopher Xenophanes (fl. c. 530 BC) wrote: “Homer and Hesiod have attributed to the gods all the things that are shameful and scandalous among men: theft, adultery, and mutual treachery” (quoted in Curtius 204). ​

A

AS DISGUISED PHILOSOPHY OR ALLEGORY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(4 BC-65 AD) ridiculed allegory as “foolishness” (Seznec 85), still, the method won out. A sixth century Latin work such as the Mythologiae of Fulgentius interpreted the rape of Leda by Zeus (in the form of a swan) as the “coupling of Power and Injustice–the fruits of such a union being, like Helen, inevitable objects of discord and scandal” (Seznec 89). ​

A

Stoic Seneca

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Myths often present themselves as explanations of how nature works or how a certain benefit or ill came about. For example, Hesiod says that men burn only the inedible parts of animals (bones and fat) as a sacrifice for the gods because Prometheus once tried to trick Zeus by giving him bones covered with succulent-looking fat and giving humans the good parts. These sorts of “explanations” are called aetiological (“the study of causes”).

A

As pre-scientific explanation.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Using stories to illustrate a moral was very popular in the Middle Ages, when writers wanted to tell pagan myths without getting into trouble with Church authorities. Therefore, they asserted that the stories illustrated moral truths. For example, one Medieval poem, The Romance of the Rose, by Jean de Meun (1237–1305 AD).

A

As fables illustrating moral truths.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(This approach looks at how a story functions in a society rather than seeing it as a response to a demand for an explanation.)​

A

As charters for customs, institutions, or beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

This kind of explanation seems less like scientific cause and effect reasoning than a kind of logic of association.

A

G.S KIRK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Romanian-born theorist of religion Mircea Eliade views myth as an effort to recapture the creative power of the origin of the world. This kind of power is necessary to maintain the divine order of the world and the seasons. This is one way in which myth functions as a charter for a sacred order of the universe and of society. ​

A

As religious power, or metaphors ​

for the unknown.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

sees myth as metaphors or symbols of the unknown. This “unknown” is located in two places: in the spiritual realm and in the depths of the human psyche.

A

JOSEPH CAMPBELL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ritual is an act or series of acts designed to bring men into contact with higher spiritual powers. An early theorist of ritual, Arnold van Gennep, noted that ritual acts can usually be divided into three stages: separation, transition, and incorporation (15-21). ​

A

As expressions of religious rituals.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Because certain images or motifs common in myth would appear in the dreams or psychotic fantasies of his patients, the Swiss psychologist Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) reasoned that many of these motifs or themes must be the products of some sort of “myth-forming structural elements in the unconscious psyche” (Jung 71). These elements he called archetypes (Greek, arkhe, beginning, original + tupos, mold, model)

A

As examples of psychological archetypes.​

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Since myths are traditional stories, they often exhibit characteristics of other sorts of traditional tales, most notably folktales. Besides studying plot motifs and tale types, folklorists also try to discover character types in stories from different cultures. For example, types like hero twins appear in both American Indian and Roman myths. Probably the most widespread character type is the trickster. Trickster figures are quite common in American Indian myths, but they will also appear in the stories we study.

A

AS STORIES

13
Q

Often called “structuralist,” this approach was invented by French anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss and is probably the most difficult to summarize in 25 words or less. Basically, Lévi-Strauss says that myths embody in their structures elementary contradictions or problems which no society can resolve. ​

A

As embodying irreconcilable structural conflicts in social systems.​