Warrantless Searches Flashcards
What are the 8 circumstances where no warrant is required?
(Hint: ESCAPIST)
ESCAPIST:
- Exigent circumstances (3 types)
- Search incident to arrest
- Consent
- Automobile
- Plain view
- Inventory
- Special needs
- Terry stop and frisk
What are the three exigent circumstances where no warrant is needed for a search?
(Es in ESCAPIST)
- “Evanescent evidence” (i.e., evidence that woul dissipate or disappear in the time it would take to get a warrant)
- Hot pursuit of fleeing felon
- Emergency aid exception (police may enter if there is an OBJECTIVELY reasonable basis for believing a person inside is in need of emergency aid)
What is evanescent evidence?
(Exigent circumstance #1 in the E in ESCAPIST)
Evidence that would dissipate or disappear in the time it would take to get a warrant
(NOTE: natural dissipation of blood-alcohol does not create an exigency sufficient to justify a warrantless blood alcohol test!)
What may police do without a warrant when in hot pursuit of a fleeing felon? (Exigent circumstance #2)
What evidence discovered during that time is admissible?
Police may enter the home of a suspect or a 3d party to search for a fleeing felon.
(N.B. Any evidence discovered in plain view while searching for the suspect is admissible!)
What is the Emergency Aid exception?
(Exigent circumstance #3 in the E in ESCAPIST
Police may enter residence if (i) there is an objectively reasonable basis for (ii) believing that a person inside (iii) is in need of emergency aid (iv) to address or prevent injury
What are the requirements for a search incident to arrest?
- Arrest must be lawful
- The search must be contemporaneous in time and place with the arrest
- Search must be confined to the person’s wingspan (which includes the body, clothing, and any containers within arrestee’s immediate control)
What is a wingspan search incident to arrest?
Includes the body, clothing , and any containers within the arrestee’s immediate control
(No regard to the offense for which the arrest was made)
What are the limitations on cellphones in a search incident to arrest?
May not search digital data on the cell phone, but May examine the cell’s physical aspects to ensure that it will not be used as a weapon
What is the rule for DNA evidence in a search incident to arrest?
Police may take a DNA sample by swabbing cheek of individual arrested for a serious offense
NY QUESTION
What is the NY limit on searches incident to arrest?
To search containers within the wingspan, an officer must SUSPECT that the arrestee is ARMED
What is the scope of an automobile search incident to arrest?
Officer may search the interior cabin, including closed containers
MAY NOT search the the trunk
What is the restriction on automobile searches incident to arrest? (MBE)
(The rule on “Secured” vs. “Unsecured” arrestees)
Once an officer has secured an arrestee (e.g., handcuffed him or placed him in a squad car), the officer may search the automobile ONLY IF he has reason to believe car may contain evidence relating to the crime for which the arrest was made
NY QUESTION
What is the NY rule for automobile searches incident to arrest?
Once occupant is out of the car, police cannot search containers inside the vehicle to look for weapons or evidence of crime
(Ex. Officer arrests Kramer for driving without a license and tells Kramer to stand in front of the car with his hands on the hood. Officer then searches the car and finds marijuana. Is search okay?
MBE: Yes, because Kramer is unsecured
NY: No, because Kramer is outside of the car)
What are four common issues w/r/t validity of consent?
- Was consent given voluntarily?
- What is the scope of the consent?
- Does the consenting party have apparent authority?
- Rules on shared premises
What constitutes consent to a search?
Consent must be voluntary
(N.B. For consent to be valid, officers do NOT need to tell someone that she has the right to refuse consent)
What is the scope of consent to search?
Consent to search extends to all areas that a reasonable officer would believe permission to search was granted
What is the effect of apparent authority on searches?
A consent from someone who lacks actual authority is valid if the officer reasonably believed that the consenting party had actual authority
(e.g., Houseguest lets cop into suspect’s apartment when cop doesn’t know guest doesn’t live there)
What are the (two) rules for searches of shared residences?
- When adults share a residence, ANY resident can consent to a search of common areas within
- IF co-tenants WHO ARE PRESENT disagree regarding consent, the objecting party prevails as to areas over which they share dominion and control
- Gloss on (2): IF the objecting co-tenant is removed from the premises for reasons unrelated to his refusal (e.g., lawful arrest), police may rely on the consent of the remaining consenting co-tenant
What is the justification for warrantless searches of automobiles? (2)
- Vehicles’ ready mobility
- Individuals lesser expectation of privacy in vehicles