W4 - Automatism Flashcards
If the accused has automatism that is rooted in a mental disorder, the accused will be found…
Not medically responsible due to mental disorder (NCR-MD). They will also not be acquitted.
The distinction between mental disorder automatism and non-mental disorder automatism hinges upon…
Whether the automatism is the result of a mental disroder
Autamosisum means…
an unconscious, involuntary act, where the mind does not go with what is being done.”
In adjudicating automatism, the central question is…
Was the accused suffering from a disease of them ind?
What occurs if the court finds that a person acted with non-medical disorder automatism?
Complete acquittal
What determines if medical disorder autmaotisum should be left to a jury?
accused has to show on balance of probabilities- entitled to qualified acquittal (Not guilty by reason of insanity).
MD automatism that is internal may be a “disease of the mind if….
); may be a “disease of the mind” if it prevents accused from knowing what he is doing.
What doesn’t count as a disease of them ind?
Non-insane Automatism if caused by external factors (such as concussion). Transient disturbances of consciousness due to certain specific external factors do not fall within concept of disease of the mind.
What is not considered a valid external factor for triggering automatism?
Ordinary stresses of life
Is automatism a defene?
Technically no. It is a subset of the voluntariness requirement which, if accepted, vitiates the means reus requirement of a crime
What is the continuing danger factor?
whether society requires protection from the accused and, consequently, whether the accused should be subject to evaluation
The law always presumes that…
people act voluntarily. Therefore the burden is on the accused to prove autoamtisum
What must the accused do to prove autamtisum?
Make assertion of involuntariness and call expert evidence (psychiatric or psychological) confirming that assertion.
When will the burden of proof be met by the accused? What happens afterwards?
when a trial judge concludes that there is evidence upon which a properly instructed jury could find the accused acted involuntarily on a balance of probabilities.
Once that evidentiary burden is met by the accused, the Crown then has the legal burden of proving voluntariness beyond a reasonable doubt.
Between insane and non-insane autmaotosum, which is presumed?
insane automatisum