W3 Language learning ✅ Flashcards
What are some difficulties in learning language, Description of language comprehension & production in children, Evaluate different theories for early-word learning
What are 4 reasons for difficulty in language learning?
- Can’t just be point and name -> uncommon & not universal, usually only nouns
- The mapping problem - does a word mean sth as a whole or a part of it (e.g. does ‘Gavagai’ means the animal itself OR part of that animal)
- Under-extension (too specific)
- Over-extension (too generalised)
What do we know about early-word comprehension in infants? (2)
- Comprehension precedes production -> 2 yrs old can comprehend 2-3x more words than they can produce
- Development:
* Can comprehend nouns (~6 months) and later with verbs (~10 months)
* Between 18 - 24 months, infants get much faster on the looking (at corresponding pictures) while listening (to words) task
What do we know about early-word production in infants? (2)
- First word (can range from many categories - nouns/verbs etc.) at ~12 months
-> By 24-30 months, can produce ~500 words - Lack of articles
- Early noun bias: predominance of nouns in vocabulary (cross-culturally)
- Produce words that are used in a variety of situations (e.g. people and objects’ names, actions, properties)
- Production errors:
- Under-extension: only use words in specific contexts or one thing only
- Over-extension: word used beyond true meaning (frequent) -> could be due to category error or vocab limitations
What are the three theories on language learning in children?
- Innate constraints theory
- Structural cues
- The Social-Pragmatic approach
What is meant by Innate Constraints theory?
Four innate rules that help children infer word meanings
- Object constraints: words refer to objects - early noun bias
- Whole-object constraint: word refers to whole objects rather than its parts
- Principle of contrast: no two words have exact same meaning (overcome overextension)
- Mutual exclusivity: no object has more than one name (override whole-object constraint and learn object parts)
What are the problems with each theory?
Theories for word learning: innate-C, structural & social pragmatic
- Innate constraints theory
* Describing rather than explaining
* What about non-noun words?
* Are constraints innate or learned via experience?
* Are constraints specific to language? - Structural cues
* Not clear which part of sentence structure children are sensitive to
* Pre-existing knowledge of words and word categories is needed for structural cues.
* Is the findings valid for long-term language development? (or just problem-solving)
* Can’t solve all problems (one word can mean many things) - Social-pragmatic approach
* What inferential skills does children use for language acquisition? (‘how’)
* Can this process account for the acquisition of complex syntax?
How does knowing structural cue (theory) help children to learn and infer words?
- Syntactic bootstrapping hypothesis: using sentence structure (syntax) to identify word category and then figure out word meaning.
-> Evidence: 3-5 yrs old is showed picture of kneading a bowl -> ask to pick sibbing, a sib and sib from pictures with different action, container and substangces. - Figuring out nouns or adjectives by how they are used in sentences
-> Evidence 2: 4-yr-olds picked different object when asked to find the ‘fep’ one vs. find the ‘fep’)
-> Evidence 3: 14-month-olds can extend novel nouns and adjectives
* for nouns - extend to category but not property
* for adjectives - don’t extend AT ALL
=> same evidence for older infants (18 - 21 months old) showing that this rule appears early for nouns - Can be used to narrow down verb meaning using structural cues.
What is meant by the social-pragmatic approach?
- Children learn words and word meaning from pragmatic (social context) cues -> remove ambiguities around word meaning.
- Word learning is constrained in two main ways:
1. How the social world is structured (e.g. routines, social interactions)
2. Social-cognitive skills (joint attention, intention reading) - Children learn language in familiar social contexts in repeated daily routines.
=> learn almost all their early language in cultural routines - During joint attention, word learning occurs when children attempt to interpret speaker’s communicative intentions.
=> Shared common ground reduces the possible referents (eliminating known words)
Evidence of social-cognitive skills:
- Joint attention:
* 18 - 20 months: learn names for objects better during joint attention
* Gaze-following behaviour (10 months) predicts language skills at 18 months - Intention reading:
* 2-year-olds understand that a novel word refers to object adult looking for rather than objects they have rejected (e.g. if they both know object B name, then [xyz] must mean name of object A)
Conclusions for word learning during infancy?
- Language learning is not isolated (cognitive, social, environmental factors)
- Children show key patterns in how they use language
1. Comprehension precedes production
2. Early noun bias - Children have access to various information sources during word learning (e.g. intention reading)
- 2 different theories to try to explain how children learn word meanings
Critical evaluation of word learning proposed theories?
General limitations of all 3 theories
- Unclear when different information is used at different stages of development.
- Would we expect the same strategies across languages and cultures?
- How do children learn less salient words (e.g., the) or words that are more abstract? (e.g., happiness, justice)
What are the 2 hypotheses for noun bias in early word production in infants?
- Natural partition hypothesis: easier to denote concrete objects (nouns) from surrounding than abstract concepts (verbs/adjectives)
- Socially mediated word learning: learning occurs in situations easiest to read adult’s intentions - usually happens with nouns
=> solve problem of NOT all first-words are nouns