[W2] - Career Management and Development Flashcards
Objective vs Subjective Career
Objective Career (focused on objective measures of growth) = Measured via hierarchical position, responsibility, status, salary etc.,
Subjective Career (focused on individual experiences across the working lifespan) = Measured via individual sequence of attitudes & behaviors associated with work-related experiences over the lifespan.
[A career can be vertical from the subjective perspective, but also horizontal. What are the career barriers that result in the ups and downs that draw people away from the “objective” career path? These barriers provide opportunities for intervention]
Career vs. Work
Career refers to the sequence of employment (all working experiences/an aggregate/long-term perspective)
Work refers to your current profession.
The process of career management for employees (Ball)
o Become aware of their own interests, values, strengths, & weaknesses.
o Obtain information about job opportunities.
o Identify career goals.
o Establish action plans to achieve career goals.
o Evaluate feedback to attain goals.
o Pursue, attain, or disengage (based on feedback – return to the beginning) from goals.
Person-Environment Fit Theory; Career Congruence
Posits that individuals will be happier and more successful if they work in a field that aligns with their vocational interest
RIASEC’s vocational interest profiles
o Realistic (persistent, stable); e.g., engineer, specialist blue-collar jobs - flourished in the manual work era but would struggle more in today’s knowledge-based economy.
o Investigative (analytical, curious, independent); e.g., biologist, programmer
o Artistic (emotional, idealistic, creative); e.g., art therapist
o Social (cooperative, understanding); e.g., social worker.
o Enterprising (energetic, self-confident); e.g., buyer
o Conventional (calm, conscientious, efficient); e.g., accountant
This list creates a cyclical graph; and those that are close together are more similar than those further apart. It is well-supported and used in the Netherlands as part of career counselling before college.
Limitations of the RIASEC Model
Interests are not necessarily static across time! Therefore the model may need to be re-administered throughout the lifespan.
Interests vs. skills (i.e., someone could be interested in nursing but have trouble with anatomy and unable to handle injections)
What is the Occupational Information Network (O*NET)
A database to identify jobs that align with one’s interests, skills, and values (plus salary preferences etc.,). It uses typology.
O*NET scores cover cognitive, interpersonal, and physical skill requirements & working conditions. Derived mostly from data of large, representative samples of US workers.
It describes about 1,000 occupations and clusters them with information about worker characteristics, skill/education requirements, experience requirements, occupational requirements (the work context of the role), workforce characteristics (e.g., the labour market info, occupational outlook – how relevant will this job be going forward?), occupation-specific information (e.g., tasks, tools).
Characteristics of a Traditional Career
A traditional career is focused on measurable outcomes, and the responsibility for an individual’s career lies more with their organization than with them.
Characteristics:
- Naturally progressing sequence of positions held within an occupation (e.g., junior controller, senior controller etc.,)
- Focus on salary increase and promotion
- Responsibility for career progression lies with the organization
The dynamic nature of modern careers
- In the modern day, people are more likely to change occupations. And even if the occupation is retained, sector movement and organization shifting is more common.
- Number of workers with work contracts of one year or less increased by over 10% since 2008.
- More temporary jobs exist; which creates more worker uncertainties, limited earning potential, more occupational transitions.
- There is changing technological and knowledge demands - which require people to self-manage (staying on track with the current job market/career demands)
What are the two modern career concepts?
- Boundaryless Career
- Protean Career
Boundaryless Career: Mobile during career - both in terms of psychological mobility (take on opportunities; enjoy working in diverse teams) & physical mobility (organizational, cross-cultural mobility).
More likely to move (physical mobility), more likely to have an open mindset toward new experiences (psychological mobility)
Protean Career: A career that is driven by one’s own values and self-directed. Employees take major responsibility for managing their careers. The goal is achieving psychological success in one’s work.
People with this career concept demonstrate negative relationships with exhaustion/strain/stress, shorter time in finding a new job, and higher career satisfaction!
People who score highly for a protean career orientation may have less of a tendency for mobility, but are very focused on fulfilling or representing their values throughout their career (i.e., would not work for a polluting company if they valued the environment).
Such individuals are driven by the subjective career definition – they are less focused on climbing the career ladder and more on doing what they like/value!
Define employability and its three subcomponents
Employability: The ability to IDENTIFY and REALIZE career opportunities. It is a multidimensional construct.
It consists of:
o Career Identity (goals, beliefs)
o Personal Adaptability (willingness/capacity to change to meet demands)
o Social and Human Capital (social networks, age, education, experience)
You can improve employability by working on any of the three subcomponents.
The Career Resources Model (Hirschi)
A focus on career resources and their development (not quite a fully-fledged “model”)
o Human capital resources: knowledge, skills, abilities that are important to meet performance expectations for a given occupation.
o Social capital resources: networks, mentors, available social support
o Psychological resources: positive psychological traits and states such as optimism, self-efficacy, resilience. (a broader version of the subcomponent personal adaptability in the previous model)
o Career identity resources: awareness of oneself and the subjective meanings linked with the work role; career goal clarity “Who am I and how is my work meaningful to me? - (similar to employability)
Career adaptability as a valuable career resource - and the meaning of its sub-facets: the four C’s
Abstractly defined as the attitudes, competencies, and behaviors that individuals use in fitting themselves to work that suits them.
Individuals high in this trait are more capable of finding better job opportunities, successfully transitioning to work, and securing high quality employment.
Its sub-facets:
- Concern (looking ahead)
- Control (taking decisions and knowing one’s desired career)
- Curiosity (open to possibilities/exploration)
- Confidence (self-efficacy).
Koen and colleagues (2012) found increases in concern, control, and curiosity at 6-month follow-up after training [name goals, reflect on present, plan progression and get feedback, get insight into world of work]. There were no increases in confidence (perhaps because of no learning experiences featuring).
Predictors of career success as identified in a meta-analysis by Ng and colleagues (2005)
o Measures of objective career success used: Salary, number of promotions.
o Measures of subjective career success used: Career satisfaction
Socio-demographics:
Salary was mildly influenced by gender (small effect = .18), with gender also having a very small effect on promotions.
Salary was also influenced by age (moderate = .26).
Nothing influenced career satisfaction.
Organizational support had particularly strong effects on subjective career success (that is, career satisfaction) - mostly for supervisor support, than career support, then training (overall .31).
Overall findings:
- Subjective and Objective career success are hard to predict – only small to moderate effects were observed!
- Gender, age, and education were the main indicators of differences in objective success.
- Environmental influences are more relevant than individual factors –> particularly for subjective career success.
Evaluating effect sizes
- .10–.23 = small
- .24–36 = moderate
- .37 and higher = high.
What can organizations do to support their employees?
- Career planning, career support, career training etc.,
- Managers as career counsellors (best in smaller companies)
› Can make realistic appraisals of organizational opportunities
› Use information from past performance evaluations to make realistic suggestions concerning career planning
› Have experienced similar career decisions, and hence have more empathy for employee. - Workshops, coaching
› What are your career goals, interests, values, choices and skills?
› Where do you want to be in your career in the future?
› What knowledge skills do you need to attain your goals?
› How do you want to gather knowledge and develop skills?
› Is your plan realistic? What are potential obstacles?
Name a company particularly known for its internal career development program
Ericsson
[Ericsson FUEL Program: professional development and career enhancement program to support Women into Leadership Roles - features workshops, coaching, lunchtime connect sessions, web-based learning, industry and leadership events, networking]
How does career development relate to low-income and low-SES workers?
There are lower career advancement opportunities in general for low-income and low SES workers (e.g., retail, cleaning etc.,).
Career-development theories and approaches are not focused enough on the experiences of low-income individuals.
What are female-specific hindrances in achieving objective career success?
- The gender wage gap
- The glass ceiling effect [an invisible barrier that prevents women (and other minority groups) from advancing into powerful positions (i.e., a qualified person wishing to advance within the hierarchy of the organization is hindered due to discrimination)]
Why might gender differences in objective career success arise?
o Different expectations and priorities associated with each gender, rooted partly in socialization (social role theory):
Women more likely expected to prioritize family or partner’s career over their own (e.g., by taking career breaks to look after children, working less overtime).
o Human capital & career path differences:
Women are more likely to major in “soft” (caring, helping professions) subjects; men tend to major in life sciences, engineering, IT, management – which are higher earning occupations [but this does not explain pay differences within the same role]
o Differences in social capital:
Women have fewer network ties than male counterparts. Furthermore, women form networks primarily with other women & do not integrate into male networks, which carry the most career-enhancing information (traditional male dominance of organizational power structures) – so women have less access to valuable career knowledge.
o Direct discrimination because of general beliefs held by key organizational players (as recruiters are typically male):
Stereotypes that women are less committed, less competent, and less suitable for organizational tasks can influence the decisions of key organizational players. Although, the female disadvantage in objective career outcomes is constantly decreasing.
[Note that none of these four explain the full picture, however]