W11 - Flood management Flashcards
Why is important to manage ecosystem services?
Resources that ecosystems can provide difficult to put a value on nature
Framework is useful to ‘monetise’ nature helpful to put things in perspective for non-geographers
What are some supporting ecosystem services?
- Habitats for animals
- Water cycling
- Soil formation
- Nutrient cycling
- Primary productivity
What are some provisioning ecosystem services?
- Providing land for farming/irrigation
- Drinking water
- Hydropower
- Trade routes
- Water for industry
- Land for building on
What are some cultural ecosystem services?
- Mental health benefits – blue space
- Tourism – brings money into economy
- Recreation
- Education
- Cultural history
- Sense of place
What are some regulating ecosystem services?
- Nutrient cycling
- Flood control
- Water quality
- Water quantity
- Sediment supply
What do the descriptive different colours of water mean?
Blue: surface and freshwater, stored in snow, stream, lake, wetland, and subsurface
Green: embedded in the evapotranspiration cycle through vegetation (natural systems, forestry, and agriculture)
Grey: polluted wastewater from urban environments that does not contain a significant faecal burden or industrial contamination (showers, laundry, and kitchen washings)
Black: wastewater in a sanitation context which is likely to contain significant pathogen burden and organic matter (toilets and latrines)
What are the flood risk management strategies acting to reduce the probability of flooding?
Hard Engineering
o Maintenance of existing flood defences
o Construction of new flood defences
o Construction of flood control schemes (e.g. storage basins)
Source water management and Natural flood management
o Maximise water storage/flow attenuation capacity of the catchment (land use control – wetlands, forests and increasing infiltration on agricultural land)
Planning and enforcement
o Enforcement when activities of riparian owners are detrimental to flood risk
o Minimise new development on flood plain/high risk areas
o Sustainable urban planning
What are the flood risk management strategies acting to reduce the consequences of flooding?
More complete flood risk mapping
o understanding where flooding is likely to occur
o Including pluvial (surface water) flooding
Promoting awareness of flooding
o Operating and improving flood warning systems
o Improving actions of individuals and organisations to minimise consequences
o Providing and improving flood incident management
Promoting resilience and resistance of properties already in flood plain/high risk areas
o 2.4 million properties on floodplain in England!
o Waterproof doors, airbricks etc
o Flood insurance
What are the hydrological factors to consider for flood managers
meteorological factors + factors controlling water delivery to channel + channel capacity
What are the traditional engineering approaches to flood risk reduction?
- Focus on fluvial flooding
- Focus on channel capacity
- Preventing the likelihood of flooding (e.g. over-banking).
Hard engineering approach to water and channel management
o Focus on flooding at problem locations – doesn’t tackle issue of flooding at source
o Embankments – disturbs and churns the environment
o Flood relief channels
o Move water through the system faster.
Infrastructure to redirect/store flow:
New Danube, Vienna (Bruce, 2019; Hurby, 2021)
Designed to 1-in-10,000 year event
* Success story in terms of hard engineering approaches
* Entirely man-made channel that runs about 25km through Vienna
* The new Danube is basically cut off from the main Danube for most of the year – become part of the city
* Able to direct all of the extra water and sediment to the extra channel
* Would have been very expensive but has been built to last
Salford flood storage basin
Cost £10 million
Building a bunch of levies that allow for low quality land to be flooded – prevents water from reaching high value areas
Infrastructure to limit flow
Thames Barrier
* Designed in the 1970s to withstand what they thought a 1-in-1,000 year flood was to 2030
* Cost £534 million (>£1.6 billion today)
* Operational from 1982
* Should operate to 2060-70 – their climate change and sea level rise predictions were more intense than they were
* Thames Estuary 2100 team already planning replacement
* All of the hard engineering approaches have knock on effects in other places
Keswick hard engineering example:
- Glass flood defence wall
- But what if the event magnitude exceeds the 1 in 100 year event?
- Flood defences failed
- December 2015
- £2m just to save the pencil museum
- Massive £6m investment of the wall becomes useless and needs maintaining pretty fast
Dredging to increase channel capacity?
- Limited evidence that dredging is that effective as a flood control
- Rivers are very good at self-regulating
- Cost ~£12 per m3 so process vary from £10,000 to > £2 million depending on scale
Challenges to hard engineering options
- How do you decide which defences to prioritise?
- Increased awareness of need to manage whole catchments (spatial interactions)
- Growing appreciation that flooding systems are dynamic over time and flood risks increasing (e.g. climate change)
o We can’t all have massive defences - Can we really stop flooding happening?
o Management rather than elimination? - But what are ‘acceptable risks’ from flooding?
- How land is used
o Loss of local land – parks dug up to make flood defences
o Die off of marine life at the River Tees due to dredging higher upstream
What is Soft Engineering, Working With Natural Processes (WWNP) and Natural Flood Management (NFM)
- Managing flood risk by protecting, restoring and emulating the natural regulating function of catchments and rivers
- Has the potential to provide environmentally sensitive approaches to minimising flood risk, to reduce flood risk in areas where hard flood defences are not feasible
o Maybe a village too small etc. - increase the lifespan of existing flood defences.
- Working with nature to reduce flood risk
What are the Environment Agency 2018 ‘Working with Natural Processes’ report Categories of NFM Intervention?
- River and floodplain management
- Woodland management
- Run-off management
- Coast and estuarine management
The basis for NFM
- Human activities have altered the hydrological function of most river basins to reduce natural attenuation of flood waves
- It is possible to restore the basin to a more naturally functioning hydrological system
- There are also natural kinds of infrastructure (e.g. woody debris dams, bunds) that can be used as an alternative to hard engineering solutions
(Lane, 2017)
What are NFM Interventions trying to achieve? (Lane 2017)
- Been around for around 10-15 years
- Said that it worked people began to make their own defences
- Hydrograph attenuation
o Increase upstream storage during extreme events
o Manipulation of hillslopes to reduce rapid runoff
o Increase attenuation within channels and the drainage network
Types of river and floodplain management:
River restoration: reinstatement of natural processes and features in a river
Floodplain restoration: Restoration of the hydrological connection between rivers and floodplains
Leaky/woody barriers: pieces of wood installed in channel, river corridor or floodplain to manage water
Offline storage areas: areas of floodplain adapted to retain water in a managed way
Types of river restoration:
Embankment removal
Re-meandering
Deculverting
Types of floodplain restoration:
Beaver reintroduction
Offline storage
Improving floodplain connectivity