W1 Competencies and Legislative Procedures Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the principle of conferral?

A

EU through its institutions can only exercise the powers as conferred by the treaties (silence means no power)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where is the principle of conferral dictated?

A

Articles 4 and 5 of TEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the categories of EU competency?

A

Exclusive competence
Shared competences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is exclusive competency?

A

Only the EU may legislate on this competency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is shared competency?

A

EU and member states both may legislate on this competency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is subsidiarity?

A

Generally: principal that public power be attributed to the level of gov’t that can most effectively exercise it

EU Principle: Art 1 of TEU: decisions should be taken as closely as possible to the citizen

EU in Practice: For all areas falling outside of EU’s exclusive competency, the EU will only legislate if the goal could not sufficiently be achieved by a member state due to scale or effects of the proposed action or would be better achieved by the EU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Where is subsidiarity set out?

A

Article 5(3) of the TEU

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the subsidiarity test?

A

1) Does the EU have exclusive competence in this area, i.e. is it listed in Art 3 TFEU?
2) The necessity test - is it necessary for the Union to step in or are MS capable of achieving the objectives of the proposed action
3) Would the objectives be better achieved at Union level, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do national Parliaments enforce subsidiarity?

A

The early warning system/ Protocol 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the early warning system?

A

When member state Parliaments receive draft legislation and have an 8-week period to produce a reasoned opinion on why the draft fails to comply with subsidiarity
Also known as Protocol 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the types of reasoned opinion resulting from the early warning system?

A

Individual opinion
Collective opinion
Special legislative opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is an individual opinion?

A

The reasoned opinion of an individual parliament or chamber

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the result of an individual opinion under Protocol 2?

A

EU institutions must “take account of” individual opinions but are not obliged to follow them (unless Treaty says otherwise)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a collective opinion?

A

The aggregated reasoned opinions adopted by at least a third of total votes under Protocol 2 (a quarter if related to freedom, security, or justice) arguing that the proposed draft legislation does not comply with the subsidiarity test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the result of a collective opinion under Protocol 2?

A

If the threshold for a collective opinion is reached, then the draft legislation must be reviewed (but not necessarily changed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a special legislative opinion?

A

Applies when examining a Commission proposal under ordinary legislative procedure

Requires a simple majority of votes rejecting draft legislation as not complying with subsidiarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the result of a special legislative opinion under Protocol 2?

A

Commission may choose to maintain, amend, or withdraw the proposal

If they choose to maintain, they publish their own reasoned opinion in response, and the legislation is referred to the EU Parliament and Council. The legislature must then take “particular account” of the various opinions.

Then, if a simple majority in the European Parliament, or a 55% majority in Council, reject the proposal for subsidiarity non-compliance, then the proposal goes away.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the time limit to challenge legislation on the basis of subsidiarity compliance?

A

8 weeks from draft publication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Can legislation, once passed, be challenged for subsidiarity-related reasons?

A

Yes, but the Court favours a single step test: is the objective better achieved at the Union level?

Authority/examples: British American Tobacco, and Vodafone cases

20
Q

The Queen v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte British American Tobacco

A

Facts: UK-based tobacco companies challenged the applicability of an EU Directive on tobacco products, arguing it only applied to products sold in EU, not those intended for export. English court referred the case to the European Court of Justice, who decided it applied to exports as well. Tobacco companies also argued that it broke subsidiarity rules. Court ruled that subsidiarity did apply to this Directive, but test was satisfied as the objective could be better achieved at Union level.

Significance: Indirect effect of Directives - can affect products not sold in the EU.

Subsidiarity - the Union does not have exclusive competence to regulate economic activity on the internal market, therefore subsidiarity does apply and the Directive can be challenged in Court for subsidiarity. However, Court favours the single-step test.

Proportionality - Banning manufacture of non-compliant cigarettes for export only was not the only way/least intrusive way to achieve the objective (avoiding illegal trafficking of cigarettes), but it was more efficient that reinforcing import controls.

21
Q

Vodafone Ltd v Secretary of State for Business

A

Facts: Vodafone challenged the validity of an EU regulation which set maximum roaming charges in UK courts. Argued that it exceeded EU competence and violated proportionality and subsidiarity. Court held that it was compatible with EU treaties, as it encouraged cross-border communication. Subsidiarity not violated as the Regulation didn’t hinder national legislation addressing specific situations the Regulation didn’t address.

Significance: Clarified subsidiarity vs harmonization/market integration: nations can legislate for specific circumstances not covered by EU legislation. Again, Court favoured the single step subsidiarity test re: better achievement at the Union level.

22
Q

Facts: Vodafone challenged the validity of an EU regulation which set maximum roaming charges in UK courts. Argued that it exceeded EU competence and violated proportionality and subsidiarity. Court held that it was compatible with EU treaties, as it encouraged cross-border communication. Subsidiarity not violated as the Regulation didn’t hinder national legislation addressing specific situations the Regulation didn’t address.

Significance: Clarified subsidiarity vs harmonization/market integration: nations can legislate for specific circumstances not covered by EU legislation. Again, Court favoured the single step subsidiarity test re: better achievement at the Union level.

A

Vodafone Ltd v Secretary of State for Business

23
Q

Facts: UK-based tobacco companies challenged the applicability of an EU Directive on tobacco products, arguing it only applied to products sold in EU, not those intended for export. English court referred the case to the European Court of Justice, who decided it applied to exports as well. Tobacco companies also argued that it broke subsidiarity rules. Court ruled that subsidiarity did apply to this Directive, but test was satisfied as the objective could be better achieved at Union level.

Significance: Indirect effect of Directives - can affect products not sold in the EU.

Subsidiarity - the Union does not have exclusive competence to regulate economic activity on the internal market, therefore subsidiarity does apply and the Directive can be challenged in Court for subsidiarity. However, Court favours the single-step test.

Proportionality - Banning manufacture of non-compliant cigarettes for export only was not the only way/least intrusive way to achieve the objective (avoiding illegal trafficking of cigarettes), but it was more efficient that reinforcing import controls.

A

The Queen v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte British American Tobacco

24
Q

What is proportionality?

A

The content and form of Union action shall not exceed what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaties.

25
Q

Where is proportionality laid out?

A

Art 5(4) of the TEU

26
Q

When legislation is challenged on proportionality, what test is applied?

A

1) The measure adopted doesn’t have to be the best possible measure. Only breaches proportionality if it is “manifestly inappropriate having regard to the objective”.

2) Legislature must base its choice on objective criteria and evaluate whether the objective justifies substantial economic consequences

Authority: Vodafone v Secretary of State for Business.

27
Q

What is the flexibility clause?

A

Provides a legal basis for measures which are aligned to the Treaty objectives but for which the Treaties do not explicitly confer the necessary powers onto the Union.

It allows the EU to legislate on matters which are not explicitly within its competency (shared or otherwise).

28
Q

Where is the flexibility clause laid out?

A

Article 352 TFEU

29
Q

What is the hierarchy of norms?

A

The hierarchy of different types of legislation. For the EU:
Primary law: Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights
Secondary law: Acts based directly on the Treaty, including Union legislation
“Lowest” laws: Delegating/implementing acts - must comply with the enabling provision of the secondary law

30
Q

What compels the European Commission to propose legislation?

A

Policy direction set by European Council
European Parliament, by majority, can request proposal
Citizen’s Initiative

31
Q

What is the Citizen’s Initiative?

A

Process through which ordinary citizens of the EU can invite the Commission to submit a legislative proposal

32
Q

Where is the Citizen’s Initiative laid out?

A

Art 11(4) TEU

33
Q

What are the requirements for a Citizen’s Initiative?

A

One million citizens, from at least 7 different MS, with a minimum number of signatories from each.

34
Q

Where is the ordinary legislative procedure laid out?

A

Art 294 TFEU

35
Q

What is the ordinary legislative procedure?

A

1) Commission submits a proposal, which may be amended at any time during the procedure until the Council acts
2) Generally the proposal has three readings, including Council’s position, Parliament’s amendments, and the joint text
3) Parliament and Council agree on the text (several methods)

36
Q

What are the types of Legal Acts?

A

Regulation, Directive, Decision

37
Q

Where are the types of Legal Acts laid out?

A

Art 288 TFEU

38
Q

What is a regulation?

A

Legislation which is binding and directly applicable across all Member States, requiring no implementing measures.

39
Q

What is a directive?

A

Legislation which is binding as to the result to be achieved, but requires implementing measures. Its form and method of implementation is up to the MS’ discretion, but must be implemented by a deadline set by the EU. It may be generally applicable or addressed to specific MS.

40
Q

What is a decision?

A

Legislation which is addressed to specific parties. It is immediately binding with direct effect to the specified parties, requires no implementing measures. Addressees are notified.

41
Q

What is a recommendation?

A

Non-binding, however national courts are obliged to take recommendations into consideration

42
Q

What is an opinion?

A

Non-binding, however breach of an opinion of an institution can justify annulment of the breaching act. Similarly, if the Court provides an opinion on compatibility of international agreements, then that is binding (if opinion is that it’s incompatible, then the agreement must be abandonned or renegotiated).

43
Q

What is a delegated act?

A

Some legislation may delegate powers to the Commission to supplement or amend non-essential elements of the original legislation. (i.e. secondary legislation)

44
Q

What is an implementing act?

A

Apply to areas requiring uniform application (e.g. agriculture). Allows the Commission to provide further detail relating to the content of the (primary) legislative act, to ensure uniform implementation in all Member States.

45
Q

Where is a delegated act defined?

A

Art 290 TFEU

46
Q

Where is an implementing act defined?

A

Art 291 TFEU