Vygotsky's theory of cognitive develpment Flashcards

1
Q

In contrast to Piaget, what did Vygotsky emphasise?

A
  • Vygotsky did not suggest children develop te ability to think in specific, age-related stages
  • Instead Vygotsky emphaises the importance of social interaction, context and culture, language and ZPD and scaffolding to cognitive development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The theory stresses the role of social processes

A

Vygotsky agreed with Piaget that children develop reasoning skills sequentically but believed this procress were mainly dependent on social processes

  • First intermental (between someone expert and someone less expert)
  • Then intermental (within the individual)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cultural differences in learning are explained through differing experiences

A

Reasoning abilities are acquired via contact with those around us

As a result there will be cultural differences in cognitive development because we all grow up and learn about the world surrounded by cultural values and beliefs

Children pick up ‘mental tools’ that are most important for life from the world they live in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ZDP is the gap between current and potential capbilities

A
  • Zone of proximal development (ZDP) is the gap between
    • What a child knows or can do alone and
    • What the child is capable of, following interaction with someone more expert

Vygotsky claimed that the role of a teacher was to guide the child through this gap to as full a level of understanding as the child’s developmental ability would allow

(doesn’t matter of age)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are children born with?

A

elementary mental functions

e.g memory,perception

(role of culture allows to transform these basic biological functions into higher mental functions e.g use of mathematical system)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the role of others - experts

A

Experts are individuals who psess greater knowledge than the child

The child learns through sharing problem-solving experiences with the expert

Initally the expert guides the activity but gradually transfers responsibility to the child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the role of language?

A

Experts transmit cultures to the child using semiotics

Initially language takes the form of shared dialogues between the adult and child (pre-intellectual speech)

But as the child develops mental representation

he/she is able toc ommunciate with themselves to enable intellectual development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the role of social and individual level?

A

Every function in child’s cognitive development appears first on social level (between expert and child) then on individual level(inside child)

The social experience enables the development of higher mental functions

Both social and indvidual experiences depend on the use of semiotics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is scaffolding?

A

An approach to instruction that aims to support a learner only when absolutely necessary i.e to provide a supportive framework (scaffold) to assist the learning process

Scaffolding describes the process whereby a learner is assisted through their ZPD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Increased skills and reasoning ability from experts

A

From Vgotsky , cognitive development was not just about acquiring moe facts but becoming more skilled at reasoning

The most advanced (formal) reasoning can only be achieved with the help of experts, not simply through exploration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Experts use scaffolding to help the learner cross the ZPD

A

Wood et al (1976) suggest a umber of features of scaffolding including:

  • Recuitment - engaging a learner’s interest
  • Reduction in degrees of freedom - focusing learner and getting started
  • Direction maintenace - motivation learner to perserver
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Progressive scaffolding stratergies

A

Wood et al identified progressive stratergies that can be used to scaffold learning. e,g prompts might be (from most to least)

  • Demonstration (e.g mother draws object with crayons)
  • Preparation for child (e.g mother helps child hold crayon)
  • Indication of materials (e.g mother points out crayons)
  • Specific verbal instruction(e.g mother says - green crayon)
  • General prompt (e.g mother says ‘ draw something else’)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Strength

ZPD

A
  • Roazzi and Bryant found that 4-5 year old performed better on a ‘number of sweets’ challenge when working with peers (who offered support on estimating rather than alone)
  • This demonstrated that children can develop more advanced reasoning skills when working with expert peoople.
  • This therefore supports validity of ZDP as developmental concept
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Limitation

all individual differences are not acknowledged

A
  • Both Piaget and Vygotsky assumed that the process of learning are essentially universal. However, not all children may learn effectively in a social situation
  • The personality of the learner and style processing may differ and need to be taken into account in explaining their cognitive develpment
  • Practically, Vgotsky’s theory may not be helpful in understanding the learning process of every child and the idea may not be appicable to all
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Limitation

Not all children respond identically to learning opportunities

A
  • Howe et al (1992) found that 9-12 year olds who had group discussions about the movement of objects down a slope showed a better understanding after the discussion but did not all pick up the same facts
  • So even when children experience the same interaction or experience they do not necessarily have the same level of nature of cognitive development
  • Vygotsky’s theory can be critised for not fully explaining the differental rate of development f different children whereas Piaget’s concept of maturation can
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Another strength is support for the idea of scaffolding

A
  • Conner and Cross (2003) observed 45 children at intervals between the ages of 16 and 54 months, findings that mothers use less direct intervention as children develop
  • This shows how the level fo help given by an expert partner declines over time as suggested by the process of scaffolding
  • This supports Vygotsky’s claim that scaffolding is a good description of the process by which children move through their ZPD
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did Vygotsky believe in ZPD?

A

He believed the thinking skills are developed by interaction

It does not take place with younger children (Pratt et al, 1992)

18
Q

Extra information with language

A
  • It has two distinct functions and used differently by younger and older
  • Social speech ( using words to communicate with others - 7-8 years old)
  • Vygotsky believed children were born with elemenatry mental functions like attention and memory skills into higher mental functions or complex thinking
  • Also talking to themselves during a difficult task - egocentric task
19
Q

Extra information with social, interaction , context and culture

A
  • Vygotsky believed the ability to think and reason was the outcome of a fundamental social process
  • e.g interaction happening everday , formal - school and informal friends
  • This allows cognitive skills to develop as children interaterate with other people
  • “Child is an apprenctice” - full of tools to think (children seeing adults using problem - solving skills and cognitive tools)
20
Q

Outline Wood and Middleton (1975) to provide support for scaffolding

A
  • Procedure- Tweleve mothers were asked to teach their own four-year old children how to put together a wood jigsaw puzzle so they could do it on their own
  • The sessions were recorded and analysed
  • Findings - The types of support offered by ,others categeroied. They found the most successful method was ‘mothers as teacher’s who would supply help on child’s action
21
Q

What is methodological issues with Wood et al?

A
  • The study was observational methods to provide detailed data
  • However, concerned about generalising to a small sample
  • Collected qualatative data to quantative data obervseration. This is subjective to interpreation
22
Q

What is the ethical issues with Wood et al?

A
  • This took place when mothers present in home and less likely to be stressful
    • Understanding the right to withdraw
    • Debreif given to parents
23
Q

What did Moss (1992) show?

A

This shows that scaffolding doesn’t only take place with younger children

24
Q

What did Pratt et al (1992) show?

A

They found out that there was some variations in children’s performances related to how parents scaffolded

25
Q

What did Greenfield and Lave (1982) found out?

A

Started by watching them and working alongside adults who gave them simple actions to support

Scaffolding only rakes place differently

26
Q

What does Tzuriel and Shamir (2007) provide support for?

A

Scaffolding and social interaction

27
Q

Tzuriel and Shamir (2007) - Aims

A

Peer assessed learning in Israel, impact of peer-mediated processes on the ability of young children to master seriation tasks

28
Q

Tzuriel and Shamir (2007) - Procedure

A

They took a sample of 89 years 1 child and were tested to ensure they were unable to carry out seriation

Each year 1 child was then paired with year 3 mediator

  • This experimental group of meditaors took part in a programme which taught them how to use mediation teaching style
  • The control group of mediators were given an equvailent session on social interaction with their ‘pupil’
29
Q

Tzuriel and Shamir (2007) - Findings

A

Following this each pair took a part in teaching session on seriation multimedia computer program and year 1 children were retested

They found that year 1 children with mediators reiceved peer mediation with younger children training had gained more improvement than the control group

Most gains in pairs where the mismatch between cognitivr abilities of mediator and pupil, in one was of low and other was of higher cognitivr ability

30
Q

What is the methodological issues with Tzuriel and Shamir (2007)?

A
  • Study employs a control group who takes part in a training programme
  • This is designed to control for possible Hawthron-type effect
31
Q

What is the ethical issues and associated with Tzuriel and Shamir (2007)?

A
  • In any study involving young children, full parental constent and school consent are required
  • Both researchers and schools need to ensure the parents are kept informed and feel able to withdraw their children if they decide to
  • Sensitive debreifing about children’s progress and abilities is also essential in studies of nature
32
Q

How did Nunes (1992) found the support of social interaction , context and culture?

A
  • That despite no formal encoding
  • Children on jobs on street vendors have well-developed mathematical skill ‘internalised; from working along side adults and older children as an early age
33
Q
A
34
Q

AO3

Issue and debate - Nature vs Nurture

A
  • Vygotsky takes the nurture side of the debate
  • Outcome of social interaction is to develop cognitive development
  • Scaffolding - ‘ignores nature’ compared to Piaget going biologically through each stage
  • This theory lacks validity and can’t take both sides (must take interactionist approach)
35
Q

AO3

Issue and debate - cultural bias

A
  • Vygotsky’s theory is not culturally bias
  • He is utilising multi-cultural evidence e.g Nunes
  • He emphaises context + culture, culture cann affect rate of development
  • This is a strength of theory as it can be generalised , more valid
36
Q

What does Piaget says when

‘Each time one prematurely teaches a child somethign he could have discovered himself, the child is kept from inventing it’

A
  • This means a child has to learn independently in order to understand than telling the answer
37
Q

What does Vygotsky say when

“What a child is able to do in a collaboration today , he will be able to do”

A

“Collabration” allows child to learn from someone more knowledge than it

38
Q

Which theorist believed children were ‘ready’ to learn certain things at certain ages?

A

Piaget - readiness approach

39
Q

How is the ‘readiness approach’ applied to everyday education?

A
  • This is influenced by how subjects are taught
  • ‘conceptive’ nature of thinking from ages 7-11 implied science is best developed providing concrete project based work
  • Abstract subjects like physics or chemistry should not be introduced before the start of formal operations at secondary school
  • Emphaised learning is an active process
40
Q

Which featurs of Vygotsky’s key features linked to education?

A

ZPD and scaffolding

41
Q

How is ZPD and Scaffolding linked to education?

A
  • Importance of ZPD as he could not identify or explain the means by which support could be delievered
  • Scaffolding refers to support or help by a more knowledge other working in ZPD
  • Physical scaffolding suports mental
  • Both measure dwhen child is stand alone
42
Q

Similarities and differences of Piaget and Vygotsky

A
  • Similarities - social speech (7-8)
  • Differnes
    • Vygotsky - ZPD, Peer mentoring, language is cruical
    • Piaget - Teacher setting discovery situations, independence