Vygotsky Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What Is Vygotsky Theory Of Cognitive Development

A

In contrast to piaget, Vygotsky did not suggest children develop the ability to think in specific, age-related stages. Instead Vygotsky emphasised the importance of social interaction, context and cutlure, language and ZPD and scaffolding to cognitive delvelopment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Vygotsky’s Belief on Social Interaction, Context and Culture

A

Vygotsky believed that the ability to think and reason was the outcome of a fundamentally social process in which cognitive skills developed as the child interacted with other people such as teachers/pupils at school, in the home with family/ siblings/friends.

The key to cognitive development was interaction this enabled children to see older people using problem-solving skills and cognitive tools and to ‘internalise’ these mental skills to use themselves. This vital interaction enabled children to develop mental skills and to learn to think.

Cognitive development comes from the ‘interplay between spontaneous natural development and the social interaction of children with adults and peers’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Discuss Brazilian Street Study By Nunes

A

Vygotsky also emphasised that the cognitive skills developed by the children are heavily influenced by context and culture. Example shown of this is of the Brazilian street children study by Nunes where despite not having no formal schooling, children who have jobs as street vendors have very well-developed mathematical skills which they have ‘internalised’ through working alongside adults and older children from an early age demonstrating the vital connection between context, culture and learning seen by Vygotsky

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Vygotsky’s Belief on Language

A

Vygotsky believed that children were born with elementary mental functions such as attention and memory which developed into higher mental functions or complex thinking skills. The transition from simple to complex thinking was made possible by language.

Vygotsky argued that language itself became internalised at around age seven enabling the child to think and perform complex reasoning tasks. Young children use monologues as they have not yet developed internalised speech

One Function of language is social speech, using words to communicate with others. Another is called intellectual speech (develops around 7-8 years old). This type of inner speech is used to regulate, plan and think and is the basis of higher mental functions. As it becomes internalised as an inner voice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Vygotsky’s Belief of ZPD

A

ZPD was defined as the distance between the child’s current development level, measured by the tasks they were able to achieve on their own, and their ability when helped by another person who was more knowledgeable or experienced than themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Vygotsky’s Belief of Scaffholding

A

Scaffolding refers to the help and support a person is to the child by Gaining and maintaining the learner’s interest in the task. Making the task simple. Emphasizing certain aspects that will help with the solution. Control the child’s level of frustration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Wood and Middleton ;Scaffholding Experiment - Aim

A

Provide empirical support for both the concept of scaffolding and the ZPD.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Wood and Middleton ;Scaffholding Experiment - Method

A

A 4-year-old child had to use a set of blocks and pegs to build a 3D model shown in a picture. Building the model was too difficult a task for a 4-year-old child to complete alone.
Wood and Middleton (1975) observed how mothers interacted with their children to build the 3D model. The type of support included:
*General encouragement e.g. ‘now you have a go.’
*Specific instructions e.g. ‘get four big blocks.’
*Direct demonstration e.g. showing the child how to place one block on another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Wood and Middleton ;Scaffholding Experiment - Results

A

The study showed that no single strategy was best for helping the child to progress. Mothers whose assistance was most effective were those who varied their strategy according to how the child was doing. When the child was doing well, they became less specific in their help. When the child started to struggle, they gave increasingly specific instructions until the child started to make progress again.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Wood and Middleton ;Scaffholding Experiment - Conclusion

A

The study illustrates scaffolding is most effective when the support is matched to the needs of the learner. This puts them in a position to achieve success in an activity that they would previously not have been able to do alone.
Wood et al. (1976) named certain processes that aid effective scaffolding:
• Gaining and maintaining the learner’s interest in the task.
• Making the task simple.
• Emphasizing certain aspects that will help with the solution.
• Control the child’s level of frustration.
• Demonstrate the task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Wood and Middleton ;Scaffholding Experiment - A P F C

A

The following study provides empirical support the both the concept of scaffolding and the ZPD.
A 4-year-old child had to use a set of blocks and pegs to build a 3D model shown in a picture. Building the model was too difficult a task for a 4-year-old child to complete alone.
Wood and Middleton (1975) observed how mothers interacted with their children to build the 3D model. The type of support included:
*General encouragement e.g. ‘now you have a go.’
*Specific instructions e.g. ‘get four big blocks.’
*Direct demonstration e.g. showing the child how to place one block on another.
The study showed that no single strategy was best for helping the child to progress. Mothers whose assistance was most effective were those who varied their strategy according to how the child was doing. When the child was doing well, they became less specific in their help. When the child started to struggle, they gave increasingly specific instructions until the child started to make progress again.
The study illustrates scaffolding is most effective when the support is matched to the needs of the learner. This puts them in a position to achieve success in an activity that they would previously not have been able to do alone.
Wood et al. (1976) named certain processes that aid effective scaffolding:
• Gaining and maintaining the learner’s interest in the task.
• Making the task simple.
• Emphasizing certain aspects that will help with the solution.
• Control the child’s level of frustration.
• Demonstrate the task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Methodological Issues with Wood And Middleton’s Scaffholding Experiment

A

Use of observational method provides rich, detailed data. Use of video recording allows the play session to be watched many times by researchers.
The sample is small and so is not a representative sample and cannot be successfully generalised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ethical Issues with Wood And Middleton’s Scaffholding Experiment

A

This study took place with mothers present in the children’s own homes. The experience was unlikely to be stressful for children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Discuss Moss (1992) Study

A

Examined mothers’ scaffolding of pre-school children on tasks such as building a tower of blocks. Moss found that mothers naturally used three strategies when playing with their young children.
These involved
*Staying one step ahead of the child, eg gathering a pile of large square suitable blocks
*inhibiting or gently discouraging ‘immature’ strategies such as putting bricks in their mouths
*Reinforcing or consolidating useful new strategies, such as giving praise when the child lines up the bricks correctly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Discuss Pratt Et Al(1992) Study

A

Studied parents helping older children with maths homework using long division. They found that some variation in children’s performances were related to how successful parents helped and scaffolded them during homework periods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Discuss Greenfield and Lave (1982)

A

Looked at young Mexican girls learning the skill of weaving from older women. They found that the girls started by watching then worked alongside adults who gave them simple tasks to do and provided help and support to achieve them. This shows how scaffolding processes take place in everyday settings and different cultures.

17
Q

Summaries the differences between Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky

A

1) . Piaget insisted that learning happens after development while Vygotsky pointed out that learning takes place before development can occur.
2) . Piaget did not believe in the significance of inputs that can be acquired from the environment but Vygotsky was confident that kids do acknowledge the inputs from their environment
3) . Piagets cognitive development theory has four evident phases. Vygotsky assumed that there are no set stages at all but only three components
4) . Vygotsky believed that development cant be detached from social context unlike Piaget.
5) . Vygotsky claimed that language plays an important role in cognitive development. Piaget only viewed language as a plain milestone in development

18
Q

Discuss Vygotsky and Culture Bias

A

Vygotsky is not Culture Bias as his theory is centred on different cultures ways of supporting and ‘scaffolding’ children. This gains population validity as different cultures can use this theory for their own understanding different methods of raising their children are not neglected by this theory and are taken into consideration. This impacts the theory by overall giving it more validity.

19
Q

Discuss Vygtosky and Nuture Debate

A

Vygotsky is favouring Nurture by saying this cognitive development can only happen with social interaction and observing of more knowledgeable others who will support the child as they grow up ( and for the rest of their life). However, he takes no consideration for the nature side of the scale. Regardless of the child’s biological mental capabilities. So this limits his theory as it’s less valid as he ignores an important aspect such as biological capabilities. He needs to take into account the nature impact to take an interactionalist view to make his theory more valid.