VTE therapeutics acute treatment Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

When would you consider removal the thrombus? (2) Risk factors (5)

A
  1. PE with risk factors for poor prognosis
    - Bradycardia (<40bpm)
    - Shock (low BP with organ failure)
    - Hypotension (systolic <90)
    - Right ventricular dysfunction
    - Myocardial injury
  2. Massive DVT plus limb gangrene (amputation needed)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 methods of removal of a clot

A
  1. Pharmacological (thrombolysis)
  2. Surgery (pulmonary embolectomy) for PE
    - reserved for CI to fibrinolysis (eg. active GI bleeding) or those who failed thrombolysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When is an IVC filter indicated (3) (FYI)

A
  • Absolute CI to anticoagulation (active bleed, intracranial bleeding)
  • Patient survived massive PE but would not live through a 2nd one
  • Recurrent VTE despite anticoagulation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When do you treat a patient with acute VTE as inpatient vs outpatient?

A

Treat as outpatient only if hemodynamically stable

Hemodynamically unstable = hospital admission
- hypotension
- hypoxemia
- tachycardia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Do anticoagulants remove clots?

A

NO
- they only stabilize it and stop it from growing so our own body can work to dissolve it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why can’t we just start with warfarin alone?

A

Warfarin only suppresses production of NEW clotting factors, does not take into account the old clotting factors that are already there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Risk of symptomatic worsening in an RCT of UFH + warfarin vs warfarin alone in patients with acute VTE?

A

Risk of symptomatic worsening 6.7% in combination vs 20% in warfarin alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the factors for picking an alternative rationally in order (4)

A
  1. Efficacy
  2. Safety
  3. Cost and convenience
  4. Patient-specific factors that may modify ranking
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which RAPID-acting antithrombotic drug/route of admin have monitoring of effect (2)

A

UFH
- IV
- SC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

UFH
efficacy
safety (3)

A

Efficacy
- compared to placebo in 1960, reduces risk of recurrent PE and mortality

Safety
- MAJOR BLEEDING
- thrombocytopenia
- osteoporosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain safety trials of UFH with major bleed

A

2-5% of patients receiving IV UFH experience MAJOR BLEEDING
- a range bc of what is defined as a “major bleed”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When is risk of bleeding increased in UFH (4)

A
  • Recent surgery/trauma
  • conditions like peptic ulcer, malignancy, liver disease
  • NSAIDs/antiplatelets use
  • Female and over 65
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain safety trials of UFH with thrombocytopenia. What are 2 possible causes of this?

A

Up to 30% of patients receiving heparin

2 causes
1. Direct effect of heparin (binding directly to platelets)
- common, not as dangerous
2. Immune reaction - HIT (heparin induced thrombocytopenia)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain safety of UFH with osteoporosis MOA. How long do you have to be on a UFH

A
  • Heparin binds to osteoblasts, which activates osteoclasts
  • associated with heparin use of 6 months
  • not entirely reversible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain pathophys of HIT (heparin induced thrombocytopenia) and treatment

A

Pathophys (immune reaction)
Occurs by 2 mechanisms:
1. removal of platelets with bound IgG by splenic macrophages
2. Platelet consumption caused by thrombus formation

Treatment
1. Stop heparin
2. Hold or reverse warfarin
3. Start a full-dose therapeutic anticoagulation with a non-heparin
- Fondaparinux (parenteral, urgent, subc)
- Argatroban

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are advantages of heparin over other rapid-acting anticoagulants? (2)

A
  • IV infusion can be stopped (vs SC)
  • Antidote exists - protamine sulfate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the IV weight-based dosing of UFH? How do we monitor UFH (2)?

A

Initial bolus of 80units/kg and initial infusion of 18 units/kg/ per hour

  1. adjust/monitor dosing using aPTT
    - drawn every 4-6h
  2. CBC, make sure platelets at baseline
    - q2days
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Is SC UFH used in Canada?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the cost/convenience of UFH

A

Cost
- drug not expensive
- drug admin (monitoring, hospital stay, home care) = expensive

Convenience
- not convenient (IV, hospital stay, home care)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

LMWH
Efficacy compared to UFH and between class
Safety (5)

A

Efficacy
- compared to UFH is similar (trials were flawed and had bias, that’s why it showed higher efficacy)

Safety (5)
- Major bleeding
- Thrombocytopenia
- Osteoporosis
- Obesity
- Renal impairment

21
Q

Dosing for dalteparin

A

200 units/kg once daily
OR
100 units/kg BID (in patients over 100kg)

22
Q

Dosing for tinzaparin

A

175 units/kg subcutaneously once daily

23
Q

Dosing for Enoxaparin

A

1mg/kg subc BID
OR
1.5mg/kg subc once daily (not encouraged for treatment of VTE because it is possibly inferior to standard dosing

24
Q

LWMH safety Major bleeding trials
Antidote?

A

Similar/lower rates compared with UFH <3%

Protamine sulfate
- only reverses about 60% of antithrombotic
- difficult to dose

25
LWMH thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis trials
Lower rates compared to UFH Cross reacts with HIT antibodies, but much less likely to cause HIT
26
Why are LWMHs associated with a lower risk of thrombocytopenia and osteoporosis compared to UFH?
UFH - chain length long enough to inhibit thrombin, can even bind to osteoblast - enhances efficacy of anti-thrombin LWMH, Pentasaccharide - Chain length not enough to inhibit thrombin
27
LWMH in renal impairment
Cleared by kidneys, can accumulate - Avoid LWMH is CrCl < 30ml/min - May use enoxaparin 1mg/kg DAILY instead of BID if under - Switch to UFH instead
28
Which LWMH is used for the highest total body weight
Dalteparin
29
What is the biggest advantage of LWMH over UFH
Convenience - All subcutaneously 1D or BID - Available in pre-loaded syringes - do not routinely require monitoring
30
What do the guidelines say about therapeutic monitoring for LWMH?
For renal impairment, obesity, pregnancy can monitor anti factor Xa concentraitons - better to switch to UFH though - LWMH dosed upon body weight so not very good at targeting anti-factor Xa
31
What values do we monitor for LWMH? how often?
CBC (including platelets) - PT/INR - aPTT - SCr at baseline CBC every 5-10 days during first 2 weeks
32
Fondaparinux Efficacy Safety
Efficacy - similar to LWMH for acute treatment Safety - Major bleeding (NO antidote) - Thrombocytopenia (not a concern can be used to treat HIT) - Renal impairment (CI in < 30)
33
Fondaparinux Dosing (3)
7.5 mg SC once daily 10 mg if over 100kg 2.5 mg if under 50kg
34
What did the EINSTEIN-DVT + PE studies say for EFFICACY in terms of symptomatic recurrent VTE with Rivaroxaban vs Enoxaparin/warfarin
Rivaroxaban is not inferior to warfarin/enoxaparin for symptomatic recurrent VTE
35
Could the extra monitoring in the EINSTEIN studies overestimated the benefit of rivaroxaban
Yes Adherence of elderly patients to preventative therapies (eg. statins) reported to be <50% after 6 months of starting therapy - they were routinely followed up so adherence was better - in practice, DOAC patients are not seen as frequently
35
What did the EINSTEIN-DVT + PE studies say for SAFETY in terms of major bleeding with Rivaroxaban vs Enoxaparin/warfarin
Rivaroxaban isn't safer then warfarin/enoxaparin for major bleeding risk (but likely not more dangerous) - has a little better bleeding rate in terms of %
35
Rivaroxaban Monitoring and antidose
None approved
35
What is monitoring for warfarin for INR checks
1. Daily for 1 week 2. Twice weekly for 2 weeks 3. Then gradually less frequently (every 4-6 weeks when stable)
36
Dosing of rivaroxaban
15mg BID for 21 days 20 mg once daily
37
Why is rivaroxaban used more commonly than apixaban
Apixaban is BID dosing
38
Why are edoxaban and dabigatran not used for acute VTE
both drugs were studied with overlap with LWMH - more expensive
39
ACCP VTE guideline for VTE and no cancer of DOACs vs Warfarin
Rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban have WEAK + MODERATE-quality evidence for use over Warfarin (for long term anti-coagulant therapy in VTE (no cancer)
40
Duration of therapy for rapid-acting antithrombotic? and when on warfarin?
5-7 days has similar to 10-14 days - as long as it followed by an effective long-term anticoagulation On warfarin? - stopped after least 5 days of therapy and 2 consecutive INRs 24 hours apart that over 2.0
41
Warfarin target INR and range
2.5 range 2-3
42
When is the highest risk period for adverse effects from warfarin?
Within the first 30 days
43
When do we use 10mg vs 5mg initiation nomogram
10mg - younger patients 5mg - older patients - pt with high risk of bleeding (on asa)
44
Elastic compression stockings ECS pressure measurement
Measured 30-40 mmHg ankle pressure
45
Elastic compression stockings ECS in PTS prevention? treatment?
Prevention - reduces risk of getting it Treatment - may alleviate edema and some symptoms PTS