Voting Trends: Party leaders Flashcards

this can be considered as part of the valence issues

1
Q

Why do we study the impact of party leaders

A
  • Study impact of party leaders, particularly public perception, on voting behaviour.
  • When people vote for the ruling party, they simultaneously elect a PM as well - image and quality of party leaders are crucial.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Examples of prior PMs and their image

A

+ Liz Truss = people argue she is like Thatcher - heavily disliked in the North - and out-of touch.
+ David Cameron = more positive image than Milliband - won the 2015 election.
+ Tony Blair = Began positive - won two more elections.
+ Gordon Brown = Poor image based on negative media portrayals and indecisiveness - contributed to election defeat in 2010.
+ Boris Johnson = poor as he faced scandals with Partygate.
+ Rishi Sunak = YouGov survey reveals that 60% of Brits views him unfavourably.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Desired qualities of a leader

A
  • Record in office (if been).
  • Compassion.
  • Decisiveness.
  • Honesty/sincerity.
  • Strong leadership.
  • Clear vision.
  • Communication skills
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Influence of the press and broadcasting

A
  • Portrays character and image are vital factors in electoral outcomes yet evidence suggests otherwise.

+ 1979: Labour PM James Callaghan led by 20% in the popularity polls against Margret Thatcher (Tory) yet still lost the election.

+ 2010: Lib Dem Nick Clegg - most popular following impressive showings in TV debates, but his party’s share of the vote fell by 1% and lost 5 parliamentary seats.

+ 2019: Boris Johnson was disliked by the population, yet considered the best candidate compared to Corybyn and won the election - mainly due to Brexit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Quote from Professor Brown

A

‘Only in an extremely close-run race that the personality of the leader…and the popularity of their principal opponent can make the difference between victory and defeat.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Data of satisfaction ratings of Govt/party leaders in 2015

A

Cameron (Con) = 46% satisfied, 48% dissatisfied.
Milliband (Lab) = 35% satisfied, 54% dissatisfied
Clegg (Lib Dem) = 34% satisfied, 55% dissatisfied
Farage (UKIP) = 31% satisfied, 56% dissatisfied
Sturgeon (SNP) = 51% satisfied, 18% dissatisfied (Scots only)
The Govt = 41% satisfied, 52% dissatisfied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Analysis of 2015 satisfaction ratings

A

At first confirms ratings do make a difference, as Cameron held the best poll ratings and went on to win the genera election.

However - not much correlation of popularity and GE:
- Labour’s vote rose compared to the Conservatives, 1.5% to 0.8 in 2010-15; UKIP’s share shot up by 9.5% - however, Labour’s Milliband was less popular than Conservatives and Farage was the least popular overall.
- Sturgeon - exception as her popularity is due to the popularity of her party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The Corbyn effect 2017

A
  • During the 2017 GE - remarkable phenomenon occurred.
  • Began the campaign as an underdog, reviled by the press, opposed by MPs and unpopular among voters = Jeremy Corbyn created a bandwagon effect - mostly among the young.
  • Little doubt his resurgence was a major influence on the election outcome and the Labour revival (rose from 30.45 to 40.0%).
  • Shows leadership can make a difference.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly