VOLUME I CH 7 Flashcards
Does direct evidence carries more weight than circumstantial evidence?
No, they carry the same weight! Don’t fight this! I realize it seems strange, but it’s true!
Is it really all that important for a paralegal/investigator to know whether direct or circumstantial evidence carry more weight?
Yes, because there is a tendency dismiss circumstantial evidence. We’ve all heard the expression, “It’s just circumstantial.” Well, that phrase is propaganda! Any competent attorney knows that circumstantial evidence is perfectly good evidence.
But can someone be convicted on circumstantial evidence alone?
Absolutely! In fact, because crimes aren’t usually committed in front of audiences, most cases are based on circumstantial evidence. Think of it: if you had to have “personal observation” of a crime to get a conviction, most murders would not result in conviction.
Can circumstantial evidence ever be preferred over direct evidence?
Yes. Direct evidence always involves personal observation. That means a witness. Good lawyers know that a witness is often easy to discredit, or at least to present a reasonable doubt about. So in a murder case, a witness who saw the murder may be discredited for a number of reasons: it was dark; the witness had been drinking; the witness hadn’t worn her glasses. And so forth. So the attorney is able to discredit the direct evidence. But the defendant’s fingerprints were on the handle of the gun. This, even though it is circumstantial, is much more difficult to discredit.
Can a single piece of evidence be considered both direct and circumstantial?
Yes. It always depends on the question being asked. The perspective. A witness who saw a defendant enter a house where a murder was committed may provide circumstantial evidence that the defendant committed the murder. But the same testimony would be direct evidence that the defendant was at the house.
This means that a jury will be allowed to consider evidence.
Credibility
Qualification
None of the above
None of the above
Admissibility
In the Binion Murder trial, the most famous murder trial in Las Vegas history, the fact that Sandy Murphy was seen passionately kissing co-defendant Rick Tabish was what kind of evidence as to the charge that they had a romantic relationship?
Direct
In the OJ Simpson case, the fact that OJ had a cut on his hand was what kind of evidence as to the murders?
Circumstantial
The evidence that may be touched is :
physical
tangible
either of the above
either of the above
In a murder trial, what kind of evidence would a video tape of the actual murder be as to the murder itself?
direct
This kind of evidence requires an inference
Circumstantial
Which of the following is an element of competency to a witness?
Understands the obligation to tell the truth
Has the ability to tell the truth
both of the elements above
Understands the obligation to tell the truth
This kind of evidence does not require an inference
direct
In the Menendez murder case, the fact that Eric, one of the defendants, admitted to his psychiatrist that he murdered his parents is what kind of evidence as to the murders?
circumstantial
direct
all of the above
circumstantial
This tends to prove or disprove a fact in question
Juries
Evidence
None of the above
Evidence
_____________ evidence is also called testimonial evidence
oral
___________ evidence is evidence that the jury will be allowed to consider
Admissible