Vitiating factors- economic duress Flashcards
Define economic duress
Illegitimate pressure/threat to damage business financially, placed on party to enter contract
Whats the leading case for economic duress and what does it give us
Pakistan v international airline corporation v times travel- says economic duress requires proof of 3 elements
What are the 3 elements of economic duress
- Illegitimate pressure on suffering party
- Pressure is significant cause of the making of the contract
- C had no reasoable alternative to giving into the pressure
Define illegitimate pressure
Economic pressure/threat from D that wasn’t legally, commercially or socially justified
In Pao on v lau yiu long what was illegitimate pressure described as
A factor which would be regarded as a coercion of his will so as to vitiate his consent
What case was an example of when the pressure given wasn’t illegitimate
CTN cash and carry v Gallagher- acted in good faith
What case named situations where pressure can be lawful, and what were these situations
Pakistan international airline corp v times travel
- d used knowledge of c’s criminal activity to threaten them
- d used reprehensible means to manoeuvre c into position of vulnerability to force c to waive claim
Describe the second element of economic pressure (pressure is significant cause of the making of the contract)
The pressure from the d caused the c to enter the contract
What case is used for pressure must be significant cause of the making of the contract, what happened in the case
Universe tank ships v ITWF- contract not enforceable if there is economic pressure
Explain the 3rd element of economic duress (c had no reasoable alternative to giving into pressure)
- other competitor charge more
- not submitting to pressure would have created claims for damages with other party
What case was used for the c having no reasonable alternative to submitting to the pressure
B + S contractors v victor green publications
What are the remedies for economic pressure
- contract voidable
- c can repudiate or affirm contract
- court can order rescission- put c in position as if contract never happened (entitlement lost if c affirms)