Views on family and state policies Flashcards
The relationship of the family to the social structure and social change, with particular reference to the economy and to state policies
Murdock (functionalist) claimed every society has a nuclear family after studying 250 examples
But - Ann Oakley (feminist) said he excluded societies that didn’t have the same gender roles
Also - examples of Kibbutz communities where all kids live together and separate from their families
Murdock’s functions of the family
Sexual stabilisation, reproduction, socialisation, economic support
Necessary in every society
Parsons (functionalist) functions of the family
primary socialisation of children - the learning and internalisation of society’s culture, values and norms via emotional warmth
the instrumental role (male) creates stress and anxiety which is relieved through the nurturing and caring of the expressive role (female)
this helps lead to the stabilisation of adult personalities
Parsons functional fit theory (functionalism) - focus on 1950s American families (era of increasing consumption, family looked to other institutions to replace functions)
the nuclear family formed as a result of industrialisation
before industrial revolution - families lived off land, large extended families (classic extended), blurred gender roles
after industrial rev. - smaller family units, geographically mobile (moved to cities for work)
Criticism of Parsons functional fit theory - pre-industrial families
Laslett’s study of British parish records suggests the most common family type in pre-industrial Britain was the nuclear family rather than the extended family as Parsons claims, as people married late and died young
Criticism of functional fit theory - post-industrial families
Wilmott and Young’s study of Bethnal Green in the 1950s found that working-class people organised themselves into extended families with women and men mutually supporting eachother
they also suggested that there are now symmetrical families with an equal split of domestic work
Criticism of Parsons ‘functional fit theory - structural differentiation
Fletcher doesn’t believe in structural differentiation, as the family still performs education, welfare and health functions, but is now assisted by the state
Parsons (functionalist) warm bath theory
the man could come home after a hard day of work and could relax into his family like a warm bath, taking away his stress and refreshing him for the next day
Parsons’ sex role theory
family roles are divided based on biological characteristics
instrumental role for men - economic support and discipline
expressive role for women - emotional support and nurturing
Marriage/relationship structures
Monogamy (2 individuals)
Serial monogamy (multiple monogamous relationships within a lifetime)
Arranged marriage
Civil partnership (originally for homosexuals, most of the legal benefits of marriage)
Polygamy (more than one partner at once)
Polygyny (a man having multiple female partners)
Polyandry (a woman having multiple male partners)
Family/ household structures
Nuclear family (2 generations)
Extended family (>2 generations)
Classic extended family (extended family living together)
Modified extended family (doesn’t live together but keeps in touch)
Beanpole family (multi-generation extended family with few people per generation)
Patriarchal family (men having authority)
Matriarchal family (women having authority)
Symmetrical family (authority and domestic work shared equally between male and female partners)
Reconstituted family (partner being previously married with kids from before)
Lone parent family
Gay/lesbian family
Single person household
New right - neo-liberalism
set of economic and political ideas, popular in the 1980s, 90s and 00s with conservative and new labour governments
stress the need for a free market with minimal state regulation to maximise personal liberty and consumer choice
Murray (new right) - urban underclass
argues that government welfare has created an ‘urban underclass’ - a distinct subculture of economically deprived people who don’t want to work
the ‘nanny state’ need to be cut so that members of the underclass are forced into the labour market to get rid of welfare-dependency
the underclass engages in ‘deplorable’ behaviour eg crime, illegitimate children and failing to socialise children properly, causing social problems like juvenile crime and educational underachievement
Evaluation of Murray’s (new right) idea of an ‘urban underclass’
Oppenheimer and Harker - it’s a useful concept because it conveys how different aspects of poverty such as low-quality housing and lack of work can compound each other
Field - it’s unfair as it victim-blames those in poverty rather than wider social factors that cause poverty
New right view on equal opportunites
Legislation such as the Equal Opportunities Act (1970) and the Equal Pay Act (1975) have encouraged women, esp mothers, to give up their expressive domestic roles to pursue careers, leading to children feeling maternal deprivation and being emotionally damaged by their mother’s absence which produces issues like juvenile crime
The new right view that the family is under attack
(they believe parents should be married, mothers should stay at home and families should not receive benefits)
state social policy has
- encouraged women to abandon their families for their careers
- weakened family life by failing to counter ‘deviant’ family forms such as cohabitation and lone parent families
- undermined marriage by making divorce easier
- resulted in too many families being dependent on benefits
- undermined morality by promoting sex education in schools, homosexuality and contraception for teenagers
Evaluation of the new right perspective on family
arguments that social policy hasn’t damaged the family
- tax and welfare policies usually favour married straight couples
- gov. ministers frequently suggest that the nuclear family is the best way to bring up children
- gov. reluctance to fund free nursery care (only 15 hours per week)
- ‘Child Support Agency’ (CSA) reinforces idea that father’s should be economically responsible
- maternity leave is longer than paternity leave
Arguments against the new right familial ideology
- it’s patriarchal as it restricts women to the home
- over-idealises the nuclear family (ignores issues like violence and abuse)
- portrays divorce negatively - Bernandes
- dismisses other types of family when they can raise equally happy and healthy kids
Bernandes (1997) divorce is
a lesser evil than an unhappy, abusive marriage
Marxist - family helps maintain capitalism
- promotes false class consciousness, getting children to accept their position within society, teaching kids to be obedient to parents so later obedient to their bosses
- family is a unit of consumption
- inheritance means property keeps people in the same classes
Engels (marxist) - theory on monogamy
monogamous families help wives, who need men for financial stability, and it also benefits husbands as women can bear children that he can pass down money to
Zaretsky (neomarxist) - the family maintains capitalism through the socialisation of children
- socialises children into ruling class ideology
- they see hierarchy and inequality in the family and view it as normal and natural
- this maintains false class consciousness
Zaretsky (neomarxist) - the family maintains capitalism through stabilisation of adult personalities
the cushioning effect
- the family is separated from work and becomes a refuge from the stress of capitalism
- it provides a ‘cushioning effect’ as an escape from oppression and exploitation at work
- this perpetuates capitalism by helping people cope with it and pacifying them, preventing a revolution