Vicarious Liabiltity Flashcards
Lister v Hesley Hall
Employer can be held liable for crimes
Twine v Beans Express
Giving unauthorised lifts means you are acting outside of course of employment
Rose v plenty
Can be liable for tort if you benefit from tort
Century insurance V Northern Ireland transport board
Employee does an authorised act in a purely careless manner
Limpus V London general omnibus
The employee does an authorised act in an unauthorised way
Poland V parr
Employee is carrying out expressly/impliedly authorised acts
Cox V ministry of justice
There doesn’t always have to be an employee/employer relationship as long as it’s similar to one
Ready mixed concrete V minister of pensions
Laid out 3 conditions in economic reality test 1) the employee provides work in return for a wage. 2) employee accepts that the work is subject to the control of the employer. 3) other terms in the contract are consistent with it being a contract of service.