Vicarious Liability & Other Miscellaneous Considerations Flashcards

1
Q

Vicarious Liability

A
  • One person (active tortfeasor) commits tortious act against 3rd party & another person (passive tortfeasor) will be liable to 3rd party for act.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

VL: Employer-Employee

A
  • Employer will be vicariously liable for tortious acts committed by their employee if tortious acts occur w/in scope of employment relationship.
  • “doctrine of respondeat superior.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

EE: Frolic & Detour

A
  • Employee making a minor deviation from employer’s business for their own purposes is still acting w/in scope of employment.
  • If deviation in time/geographic area is substantial, employer is not liable.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

EE: Intentional Torts

A
  • Intentional tortious conduct by employees is not w/in scope of employment.
  • Unless:
    (1) Employee is furthering business of employer, (ex. removing customers from premises b/c they are rowdy)
    (2) Force is authorized in employment (ex. bouncer)
    (3) Friction is generated by employment (ex. bill collector)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

EE: Liability for Own Negligence

A
  • Employers may be liable for their own negligence by negligently selecting/ supervising their employees. (not vicarious liability.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Independent Contractor Situations

A
  • Hiring party will not be vicariously liable for tortious acts of independent contractor.
  • Unless a duty is nondelegable due to public policy (ex. duty of a business to keep its premises safe for customers)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

IC: Liability for Own Negligence

A
  • Employer may be liable for their own negligence in selecting/supervising independent contractor (ex. a hospital may be liable for contracting w/ unqualified & incompetent health care provider who negligently treats hospital’s patient).
  • (not vicarious liability.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Partners & Joint Venturers

A
  • Each member of partnership/joint venture is vicariously liable for tortious conduct of another member committed in scope & course of the affairs of partnership/joint venture.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Automobile Owner for Driver

A
  • Automobile owner is not vicariously liable for tortious conduct of another person driving their automobile.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

AOD: Family Car Doctrine

A
  • In many states, owner is liable for tortious conduct of immediate family/household members who are driving w/ owner’s express/implied permission.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

AOD: Permissive Use

A
  • Some states have now gone further by imposing liability on owner for damage caused by anyone driving w/ owner’s consent.
  • Fed statute: rental car companies are not vicariously liable for negligent accidents of customers even if they do business in a “permissive use” state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AOD: Liability for Own Negligence - Negligent Entrustment

A
  • Owner may be liable for their own negligence in
    entrusting car to driver.
  • Some states also impose liability on owner if they were present in car at time of accident, on the theory they could have prevented negligent driving, & hence were negligent in not doing so. (This is not vicarious liability.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AOD: Driver Acting as Agent for Owner

A
  • Car owner will be liable if driver is acting as owner’s agent, for instance using car to perform an errand for owner.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bailor for Bailee

A
  • Bailor is not vicariously liable for tortious conduct of their bailee.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

BB: Negligent Entrustment

A
  • Bailor may be liable for their own negligence in entrusting bailed object. (This is not vicarious liability.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Parent for Child

A
  • Parent is not vicariously liable for tortious conduct of their child at CL.
  • Note, however, that most states, by statute, make parents liable for willful & intentional torts of their minor children up to certain dollar amount (ex. $10,000).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

PC: Child Acting as Agent for Parents

A
  • Cts may impose vicarious liability if child committed tort while acting as agent for parents
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

PC: Parent Liable for Own Negligence

A
  • Parent may be held liable for their own negligence in allowing child to do something (ex. use a dangerous object w/o proper instruction)
  • Furthermore, if parent is aware of child’s conduct on past occasions showing tendency to injure another’s person/property, they may be liable for not using due care in exercising control to mitigate such conduct, (ex. by allowing child to play w/ other children they have a history of attacking).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Tavernkeepers

A

Dramshop Act
- Such acts usually create a COA in favor of any 3rd person injured by intoxicated patron.
- Several cts have imposed liability on tavernkeepers even in absence of a Dramshop Act.
- This liability is based on ordinary negligence principles (foreseeable risk of serving minor/ obviously intoxicated adult) rather than vicarious liability.

20
Q

Tip:

A

When you see an MBE question on vicarious liability, recognizing whether doctrine applies is only first step in analysis. Even if D is not vicariously liable, P may prevail if D personally was negligent in supervising person causing injury/in entrusting a dangerous object to someone not equipped to handle it. Always look for this option among your answer choices.

21
Q

Multiple D Issues: Joint & Several Liability

A
  • CL: when 2/more negligent acts combine to proximately cause an indivisible injury, each negligent actor will be jointly & severally liable (liable to P for entire damage incurred).
  • If injury is divisible, each D is liable only for identifiable portion.
22
Q

JSL: Defendants Acting in Concert

A
  • When two/more Ds act in concert & injure P, each is jointly & severally liable for entire injury.
  • This is so even if injury is divisible.
23
Q

JSL: Statutory Limitations

A
  • Many states have abolished joint liability in cases based on fault either:
    (1) for those Ds judged to be less at fault than P, or
    (2) for all Ds regarding noneconomic damages.
  • In these cases, liability will be proportional to D’s fault.
24
Q

Satisfaction

A
  • Recovery of full payment is a “satisfaction.”
  • Only one satisfaction is allowed.
  • Until there is satisfaction, however, one may
    proceed against all jointly liable parties.
25
Q

Release

A
  • In most states, a release of one tortfeasor does not discharge other tortfeasors unless it is expressly provided for in the release agreement.
26
Q

Tip:

A

Keep in mind that neither of these doctrines affects how much P receives. Rather, they deal w/ claims by D against other joint
tortfeasors to determine how much of the total award each of them ultimately must pay.

27
Q

Contribution

A

The rule of contribution allows D who pays more than their share of damages under joint & several liability to have a claim against other jointly liable parties for the excess; in other words, it apportions responsibility among those at fault.

28
Q

Methods of Apportionment: Comparative Contribution

A

Comparative contribution system; contribution is imposed in proportion to relative fault of various Ds.

29
Q

.

A

.

30
Q

MOA: Contribution Tortfeasor Must Have Liability

A
  • The contribution D must be originally liable to P.
  • If contribution D has a defense that would bar liability (such as intra-family tort immunity), they are not liable for contribution.
31
Q

MOA: Not Applicable to Intentional Torts

A
  • Contribution is not allowed among intentional tortfeasors.
32
Q

Indemnification

A
  • Indemnification involves shifting entire loss between/among tortfeasors.
  • Indemnity is available:
    (1) In vicarious liability situations
    (2) Under strict products liability for the non-manufacturer
33
Q

Tip:

A

To keep contribution and indemnity separate in your mind, recall that, for contribution to apply,
generally both Ds must have a measurable degree of culpability for the tort; on the other hand, indemnity usually applies when paying D is much less responsible than nonpaying D or is
liable only vicariously b/c of their relationship w/ nonpaying D

34
Q

Comparative Contribution

A
  • As noted above, most comparative negligence states have adopted a comparative contribution system where contribution is in proportion to the relative fault of the various Ds.
  • This approach also replaces indemnification rules based on identifiable differences in degree of fault.
35
Q

Loss of Consortium & Tortious Interferences with Family Relationships: Between Spouses

A
  • Either spouse may bring an action for indirect interference w/ consortium & services caused by D’s intentional/negligent tortious conduct against other spouse
36
Q

LOC: Parent-Child

A
  • A parent may maintain an action for loss of a child’s services & consortium as result of D’s tortious conduct, whether intentional/negligent.
  • A child, however, has no action in most states against one who tortiously injures their parent.
37
Q

LOC: Nature of Action

A
  • Actions for interference w/ family relationships are derivative.
  • Hence, any defense that would reduce/bar recovery by injured family member also reduces/bars recovery for interference w/ family relationship.
38
Q

Survival of Tort Actions

A
  • Survival acts allows COA to survive death of one/ more of the parties.
  • Acts apply to actions involving torts to property & in personal injury.
  • However, torts invading intangible personal interests (ex. defamation, invasion of right of privacy,
    malicious prosecution) expire upon vict’s death.
39
Q

Wrongful Death

A
  • Wrongful death acts grant recovery for pecuniary injury resulting to spouse & next of kin.
  • Decedent’s creditors have no claim against amount awarded.
  • Recovery is allowed only to extent that deceased could have recovered in an action had they lived.
  • Hence, decedent’s contributory negligence reduces wrongful death recovery in comparative negligence states.
  • Similarly, a potential beneficiary’s contributory negligence reduces their share of recovery in comparative negligence states.
40
Q

Intra- Family Tort Immunities

A
  • CL: one member of a family unit could not sue another in tort for personal injury.
  • Today: most states have abolished spousal immunity.
  • A slight majority have also abolished parent-child immunity (but generally do not allow children to sue merely for negligent supervision).
  • Those that retain parent-child immunity do not apply it in (1) cases alleging intentional tortious conduct, or (2) automobile accident cases to the extent of insurance coverage.
41
Q

Governmental Tort Immunity

A

In varying degrees, federal, state, and municipal tort
immunity has been eliminated. Where it survives, immunity attaches to governmental, not proprietary, functions.

42
Q

Federal Government Immunity

A
  • Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the United States has waived immunity for tortious acts.
  • However, immunity will still attach for (1) assault, (2) battery, (3) false imprisonment, (4) false arrest, (5) malicious prosecution, (6) abuse of process,
    (7) libel & slander, (8) misrepresentation & deceit, and (9) interference w/ contract rights.
  • Immunity is also not waived for acts that are characterized as “discretionary” (those involving considerations of political/economic policy, usually made by senior officials); acts termed “ministerial” (those performed at operational level of gov) are not immune from liability.
43
Q

State Governments Immunity

A

-Most states have substantially waived their immunity to the same extent as the federal government; hence, immunity is retained for discretionary acts and for legislative and judicial decisionmaking.

44
Q

Local Government Immunity

A
  • About 1/2 of states have abolished municipal immunity to same extent as for state gov.
  • Where municipal immunity has been abolished, “public duty” rule provides: duty owed to the public at large is not owed to any particular citizen absent a special relationship between governmental body & citizen.
  • Thus a city will not be liable to one whose house burns if its fire department negligently fails to respond to an alarm, b/c the provision of fire protection services is a public duty.
  • Where municipal immunity still exists, contrast “governmental” functions (functions that could only be performed adequately by the gov) & “proprietary” functions (functions that might as well have been provided by a private corp).
  • Cts limit application of sovereign immunity by not
    granting it for proprietary functions.
45
Q

Immunity of Public Officials

A
  • Public officials carrying out official duties are immune from tort liability for discretionary acts done w/o malice/improper purpose.
  • Liability attaches, however, for ministerial acts.
46
Q

Charitable Immunity

A
  • The majority of jurisdictions have eliminated charitable immunity