vicarious liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what are the two conditions an employer will be liable for the tort of his employees

A
  • if the worker is an employee under a contract of service
  • if the tort is committed in the course of employees employment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

element 1

A

an employee is under a contract of service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what test does the court favour to use for deciding if worker is an employee

A

economic reality test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

give examples of tests that the courts developed to decided whether a worker is an employee

A
  • control test
  • integration test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what case was economic reality test established in

A

ready mixed concrete

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

condition one of economic reality test

A

worker provides a skill in return for a wage/salary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

condition two of economic reality test

A

worker agrees to employer having control through:
- uniform
- giving holiday hours
- making sure you arrive on time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

condition three of economic reality test

A

all other factors are consistent with there being a contract of service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are some relevant factors

A
  • tax and insurance
  • self-description
  • ownership of tools
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

element 2

A

tort is committed during the course of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what do courts recognise when dealing if an employer will be liable for employees wrongful act

A
  • if the employer expressly or impliedly authorised it
  • if employer authorised it but it was done in an unauthorised way
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

employee is doing an authorised act task but does something which has been expressly forbidden by his employer

A

limpus v LGOC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

the employee is doing an authorised task but does the work in a negligent way

A

Century insurance co

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

close connection between what employee did and what they were employed to do

A
  • lister v hesley hall
  • Mohamud v Morrison
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

employers are not liable if the employee is acting on a frolic of his own

A

beard v LGOC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

journeys where the employee is being paid may be within the course of employment

A

smith v stages

17
Q

taking a detour for your own benefit may be in the course of employment

A

storey v ashton

18
Q

what are the case facts of limpus v LGOC

A
  • drivers were forbidden to race their buses
  • However, the driver still raced his bus, resulting in an accident
  • The employer was liable as the driver was doing what he was authorized to do, but in an unauthorized manner
19
Q

what are the case facts of Century Insurance CO

A

the driver lit a cigarette while moving petrol. He threw the match away which caused an explosion. The HoL held that the driver was acting in the course of his employment, as part of his job was to wait while the petrol was being transferred

20
Q

what are the case facts of smith v stages

A

an employee was injured whilst driving home due to another employee’s negligent driving. The employee was acting during his employment as his wages covered his work time.

21
Q

what are the case facts of storey v Ashton

A
  • a wine merchant went out to deliver some wine but ran over the claimant while taking a detour
  • the court held that the employee was not vicariously liable as he wasn’t on the employer’s business at the time and was acting on a frolic of his own.
22
Q

what are the case facts of Beard v LGOC

A

a bus driver drove a bus despite strict instructions not to and injured someone. The employer wasn’t liable as the driver wasn’t carrying out his own work but something outside of his employment as he wasn’t authorized to drive the buses.