Vicarious liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is vicarious liability

A

Where a third person has legal responsibility for the unlawful actions of another. It is commonly seen in the workplace where the employer is responsible of the actions of an employee who acted in the course of their employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two main test required to prove vicarious liability

A
  • was the person alleged to have committed the tort an employee?
  • Did the employee commit the alleged tort during the course of his employment?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The control test

A

Oldest test

Yewens v Noakes = whether the master has the right to control what the employee did ad the way in which it was done

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The control test - controls the employer had

A

Lord Thankerton:

  • right to control the method of working
  • right to suspend and dismiss
  • the payment of wages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hawley v Luminar Leisure

A

Development of the control test
indépendant bouncer was hired to work on a night-club (agency) and assaulted a party goer. C sued and because
- the club exercised so much control over the bouncer in how he should do his work, that it employed him and so they were vicariously liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The integration or organisation test

A

Established by
- S.J.H v McDonald and Evans
a worker will be an employee if his work is fully integrated into the business.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The multiple test

A

Established by Ready mixed concrete.

  1. the employee agrees to provide work or skill in exchange for a wage (mutuality of obligations)
  2. The employee expressly or impliedly accepts that the work will be subject to control of the employer (control)
  3. All other consideration in the contract are consistent with there being a contract of employment rather than any other relationship. (personal performance = ability to delegate work?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ways of identifying employment status

A
  • ownership of tools plant or equipment = an employee is less likely to own the plant and equipment used to work
  • method of payment = a self employed person is likely to take payment for a whole job whereas an employee would be a salary
  • if tax, NI and pension contributions are deducted from an employees wage = self employed would have to submit self assessments and pay tax annually under schedule D
  • any description of role = where a person either describes themselves as self employed or an employee
  • any independence when doing the job = how much independence and flexibility does the person Gael web doubt the work
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

personal performance - delegate work

A

Express v Tankton
Van driver could employ someone else to do his job if he wasn’t able to. Van was provided by the company
HOWEVER
the ability to delegate work would consider someone as an independent contractor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

no mutual obligations between parties

A

Carmichael v national power
C was a tour guide and was contacted when needed however withheld possibility of declining work.
For this there were NO MUTUAL OBLIGATIONS and therefore not an employee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Salmond test

A

A tort is committed during the course of employment if:

  1. doing a wrong act authorised by the employer
  2. doing an act in the wrong way but employer authorises
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Wrong way of doing an authorised act cases

A

Century insurance v NI road transport = driver lit cigarette when delivering petrol, explosion damaged Cs property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Unauthorised act

A

Beard v London omnibus = bus conductor (NOT DRIVER) decided to turn bus around and injured member of the public. Defendant not found liable because it wasn’t a part of his job

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Unauthorised act unless employer financially benefits from sed act

A

Rose v Plenty = milkman brought a 13 year old around to help him with his round despite ban under company policy. Defendants vicariously liable because they benefited from the 13 year olds work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

employee committing a criminal act

A

Lister v Helsey hall = warden of school sexually abused children. He was convicted of criminal offences. Employer found liable because they gave him the place to commit the criminal acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Employer found liable where they instructed employees work

A

Bouncer in nightclub seriously injured C. Employers were found vicariously liable because they instructed the bouncer to be aggressive and intimidating
Mattis v Pollock

17
Q

Acting on a frolic of their own

A

When employee causes damage or injury while doing something outside the area or time of their work the employer will not be liable

18
Q

Hilton v Thomas Burton

A

Workers went for a coffee break and took employers vehicle as transportation. Caused accident on the way.
employers NOT liable because the employees were acting on a frolic of their own