Vicarious Liability Flashcards
What are the A01 headings to remember?
- Nature and purpose of VL
- Liability for employees (testing)
- Can more than one employer be VL?
- Acting in course of employment
- Liability for independent contractors
What is vicarious liability?
Is where a third person, usually an employer, has legal responsibilities for the unlawful actions of another, usually the actions of an employee, acting in their course of their employment.
What are reasons for vicarious liability being justified?
- The employee was carrying out the employer’s instructions
- Employers are responsible for hiring, firing and disciplining their staff
- Employers are responsible for making sure staff are properly trained
- Employers are in better financial position to compensate claimant
What are tests for vicarious liability?
- The control test
- The integration or organisation test
- The economic reality or multiple test
What is the control test?
In Yewens and Noakes (1880) the test relates to how much control the ‘master’ had over his employee.
-Very impossible to apply today.
What case later developed the control test?
Hawley v Luminar Leisure (2006)
What is the integration or organisation test?
Unless a worker is fully integrated into the business then they are not employees. Made by Lord Denning.
What case was the economic reality or multiple test established?
Ready Mixed Concrete Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance (1968)
What is the economic reality or multiple test?
Test uses various factors to determine employment e.g:
- The ownership of any tools, plant or equipment
- Method of payment (employee usually receives regular wage)
- Any independence in doing job
What are the recent developments of VL?
A number of cases have reached the appeals courts in recent years regarding claims of historic abuse.
-Found many cases showed employment was not necessary, close relationship is.
What cases involve claims of historic abuse?
- McE v De La Salle Brothers (2007)
- E v English Province of Our Lady of Charity (2012)
What case created the question of can more than one employer be vicariously liable?
Viasystems Ltd v Thermal Transfer Ltd (2005) - Dual VL
What is dual vicarious liability?
Both employers are liable.
-The responsibility of each employer for purpose of contribution must be equal 50/50 to claimant.
What are the 5 actions/factors whilst in the course of employment?
- Acting against orders
- Acting outside employment
- Employee committing a criminal act
- Employee committing a negligent act
- Employee acting on a ‘frolic’ of their own
Acting against orders liability?
If the employee is doing this, the employer can still be liable.
-Rose v Plenty 1976 (milkman has boy, then injured, help - dairy was benefiting from work)