Verdicts and Judgments Flashcards
What are jury verdicts?
Unless parties stipulate otherwise, a jury verdict mut be unanimous and must be returned by a jury of at least six members.
The court must upon request poll the jury.
What are general verdicts?
The court may order the jury to return a general verdict which simply states which party should win without specific findings of fact.
The court may submit a general verdict, together with written questions on one or more issues of fact that the jury must decide.
What are special verdicts?
The court may require a jury to return only a special verdict in the form of a special written finding on each issue of fact.
The jury instructions must give the explanations necessary for the jury to make its findings.
What happens if there are inconsistency in the verdict form?
If the answers are consistent but one or more answers are inconsistent with the general verdict, then the court may:
- approve for entry an appropriate judgment according to the answers, notwithstanding the general verdict;
- direct the jury to further consider its answers and verdict or
- order a new trial.
If the answers are inconsistent, then the court must not enter judgment but instead must direct the jury to further consider its answers and verdict, or must order a new trial.
What happens at bench trial?
The court must find the facts specially and state its conclusions of law separately.
What is claim preclusion?
Once a case has reached a final judgment, then that case, and related claims and issues, have been decided or settled permanently and are not eligible for relitigation
Claim preclusion prevents relitigation of a claim:
- between the same parties and those who are in privity with them;
- arising out of the same transaction or occurrence underlying the prior suit; and
- that was determined on the merits by a court with proper subject matter and personal jurisdiction.
What is issue preclusion?
It prevents relitigation of issues that were fully and fairly litigated, and were necessarily decided in a proceeding that reached a final judgment on the merits.
Four elements must be met:
- the issue must have been litigated and determined in the prior suit;
- the issue must have been essential to the judgment;
- the prior suit must have ended in a valid final judgment on the merits; and
- the party against whom preclusion is asserted must have had a full and fair opportunity and incentive to litigate the issue in the first suit.
Issue preclusion cannot be used against someone who was not a party to the previous action.
There is offensive use, which is used by one who was not a party against one party who was a party. Courts are reluctant to permit offensive use. They look at the following:
- whether the P in the second suit could have easily joined in the first action;
- whether there are procedural opportunities available to the D in the second suit that were unavailable in the earlier action; and
- whether the D had incentive to litigate the issue in the first action.