Verbal Strategies Flashcards
If you see a sent that supports the conclusion, “because of”, “as a result of”, “due to”, “since”, “after all”
“Premise
- All arguments will have a premise (only one that does), not all will have a conclusion
- Can be fact or opinion
- Signal words like because signal that it supports the conclusion”
If you see a sent that negates the conclusion or premise, “however, but, yet, even so, nevertheless
“Counterpremise, counterpoint, could look like background / premise, but difference is that this negates
- if another sentence says however and goes against this, then this is the counter”
If you see a sent. that is context, doesn’t support / negate conclusion”
“Background
- Could be tacked onto a conclusion, be careful “
If you see sent. that is the author’s opinion or claim, “therefore, thus, consequently”
“Conclusion
- Could be part of a sentence, background / premise/ counter right before”
If you see a claim that looks like a conclusion, but another conclusion too
“Intermediate conclusion
- Use because A….therefore B test
- B is the final conclusion, A may be a premise or an intermed concl”
Steps for CR questions and what not to do
- Identify the question
- Deconstruct argument (FIND CONCL)
- State the goal
- Work from wrong to right (impt to not get tempted by wrong answer, only compare once and move on, you don’t know it you won’t know it)
DON’T skim the argument and not understand big pic -> you end up rereading a bunch of times. BAD
Structure based CR ?s
Describe the role of 2 boldfaces
Describe the argument
Assumption based ?s
Find the assumption Strengthen the argument Weaken the argument Evaluate the argument - find something that'll help the arg Find the flaw
All of these require you to find the assumption
Evidence based ?s
These don’t have conclusions or assumptions, just premises
Inference - what can be concluded (find something that’s true)
Explain a discrepancy
What’s the role of the boldface? Trick:
Ask 1. fact or opinion 2. for or against 3. are the 2 bolds same or opposite side
- In choices if see evidence –> fact, claim –> opinion
if it says CONTRADICT the argument
The statement must really undermine conclusion. If there’s a perhaps, then author isn’t totally disregarding conclusion.
Need to see that the author is directly attacking
Watch out for 1 wrong word
Choice may have correct except 1 word: budget shortfall vs recycling plan effect
4 steps for Role questions
- ID ? - boldface –> role, 2 people in Q
- Deconstruct arg - find C, P, X, +/-
- State goal - know desired labels! (+/i, looking for C? P? A?
- Wrong to right - beware of half right choices
4 steps for finding assumption questions
- ID ? - “assume / assumption”
- Deconstruct - find conclusion, think of assumptions
- Goal - assumption must be true for concl
- Wrong to right - use negation, negate assumption and see if it hurts concl - if you’re stuck (time consuming though)
Beware of assumption with no tie to conclusion, irrelev comparison, reverse logic
Negating choices -
better than –>
Some of them liked it more –>
equal to or less than (don’t forget equal)
None of them liked it more
Specific numbers in answer choices to be an assumption
Be wary of them, is that number absolutely true? If it can be another number, that assumption doesn’t have to be true
Strengthen / weaken concl - beware of directionally say + or -, but
not concluding the same thing
If ex is employees lose confidence bc of co viability, talking about a competitor’s raise is a negative, but doesn’t have anything to do with co viability and losing confidence bc of it
4 steps for strengthen Qs
- ID question - “strengthen, support, if true”, fill in the blank “because, since”
- Deconstruct - find conclusion, brainstorm assump
- Goal - find new piece of info that supports arg
- Wrong to right - beware of no tie to concl, weaken answers
Weaken answers can attack assumption
ex: employees lose confid in viability –> quit
weaken: competitor provides health ins so that’s why they quit, not bc lose confid
Each of the following, if true, weakens the conclusion EXCEPT
5th one doesn’t have to strengthen ,could also be neutral, does nothing. Label S, W, N - so you know to pick the S or N
Label Q as Wex
4 steps for weaken Q
- ID Q - “weaken, undermine, if true”
- Deconstruct - find concl, think of assump
- Goal - weaken or make arg less valid, ARE THERE OTHER REASONS WHY
- Wrong to right - beware of reverse logic (strengthen) or no tie to arg, overgeneralize concl and ignores 1 group
Watch out for which perspective you’re proving, ex: contention by the gvt
Gvt’s perspective - even if it says contention by, that just means the disagreement made by the gvt
CR questions - don’t forget to read the….
QUESTION! ID the Q **
As vs like
As in front of clause
Like in front of noun, never clause
Inference: Draw a conclusion Q - you have to
Find an answer that’s actually true by what you’re given. you’re not making any actual new conclusions
During rc, look for main point, then for examples / details
Note if for or against main point
Aggravate v aggravating
Worsen
Irritating
Known as vs known to be
Named
Acknowledge as
Loss of vs loss in
No longer in possession
Decline in value
Mandate vs have a mandate
Command
Have authority from voters
Native of vs native to
Person from
Species originated in
Range of vs ranging
Variety of
Varying
Rate of vs rates for
Speed or frequency
Prices for
Rise vs raise
General increase
Bet or salary increase
Try to do vs try doing
Seek to accomplish
Experiment w
RC steps
- Find the point of the passage - 1 sent
2. Purpose of ea paragraph - 1 word ea
Rc general question steps
Id question
Find support - look at your map for purpose q
Predict answer
Eliminate wrong to right
Parallelism flags
Both phrases must be ||
- X as well as Y
- X but also Y
- X but Y
- X rather than Y
Comparison (more than)
Both phrases must be ||
more X than Y
Parallelism - words after
don’t have to be identical
- WHO speak english and WHOSE parents don’t
- IN the box AND ON the table (prepositions can vary)
Open parallel marker vs closed
Open: X but Y
Closed: not only X, but also Y
Open - check for ambiguity, need similar signal word
Closed - needs exact match
||- not X,
but rather Y (X rather Y doesn’t work)
- rather alone IS WRONG (fine if it’s not X or Y, RATHER C)
- not X or Y is fine
- not X, Y is wrong
||- not only X,
but also Y (can’t use but also alone)
||- Between X
and Y
||- Consider X,
Y
||- in contrast to X,
Y
||- Distinguish X
from Y
||- Estimate X
to be Y
||- Mistake X
for Y
||- Think of X
as Y
||- View X
as Y
||- Whether X
or Y
|| Linking verbs:
Must be ||
this politician IS a step forward (politiican not parallel to step forward)
- appear, become, feel, grow, look, remain, represent, resemble, seem, smell, sound, stay, taste, turn
Noun modifiers - which that who whose whom where when
Place as close to the noun
Don’t get tricked by possessive noun (incorrect)
Who whom which whose - when to use what
Who whom - people
Which - things
Whose - both
Where vs in which
Where - place, generally MUST be a PHYSICAL location
In which - condition, circumstance , arrangement
When vs in which
Both for periods of time
Adverbial modifier placement
More free
But need to make sure you know which verb it modifies
Which vs ing
Which modifies noun only never s clause
Many vs much
Many is countable much isn’t
Few vs little
Few is countable little isn’t
Fewer vs less
Fewer is countable less isn’t
10 items or fewer
Fewest vs least
Fewest is countable
Numerous vs great
Numerous is countable great isn’t
Number v amount
Number is countable
It’s numbers are greater than / more than
$20 less than / fewer than
Greater than
Less than
When you see comma (signal), look out for
Modifier issues (figure out what the phrase is referring to)
When you see -ly, it’s a ____ and can modify ____
-ly is an adverb, can modify everything except noun
If you see phrase that starts with who, what, which, etc. and is parallel to another
the other phrase has to start with same who, what which, etc.
When you see modifiers and commas, check if they are
commas are only needed if they’re essential (if noun is vague and you need to clarify then shouldn’t be in comma)
SC Steps
- Read for meaning
- Look at answer choices - get hint for splits
If you can’t figure out what, check the following
- Find core: Look for noun and verb - complete sent (structure), ELIMINATE prep phrases or other distractions
- Verb - is tense right? (every verb, and if they match tense)
- BEWARE OF COMP MARKERS - “THAN”
- Modifier issues - where are commas / phrases.
that vs which - what’s needed
, which needs comma
which only refers to nouns, not clause (RIGHT BEFORE IT, unless there’s some prepositional sword OF Stevenson - still fine)
adverb modifies
adverbial modifier
everything but noun or pronoun
(-ly)
adverbs, verbs, adj, phrases, entire clauses - just no nouns
Ex:
adjective modifies
noun or pronoun only
When you see “which”, “that”, “who”, “whose”, “whom”, “where”, “when”
noun modifier, MUST modify noun
That is more complex - can signal other types
noun modifier
Modifies noun / pronoun only
Answers - who, what, which, where
Must be placed as close to noun as possible
Ex: A hardworker, Sue…
Ex: the road, which cut across
“who, whom” modifies
people
Less or fewer (dollars, gallons, money)
Unit nouns are not countable (1 money, 2 moneys?)
Less than 10 dollars, not fewer than 10 gallons
Less money not fewer money
The “number” of birds is xx than
Greater vs more
actual word “number”, “numbers” goes with greater
Greater is not countable, greater likelihood, greater the chance
More is countable, More likely, studied more (hours)
“whose” modifies
people OR things (don’t forget)
Ex: the town whose …
“where” modifies xxx, but not xxx
where modifies place
but not situation, circumstance
“in which” can modify
age,
period of time (like “when”)
Circumstance, situation
when you see “such” “that” BEWARE
Correct: so [adjective like awesome] that ….
Correct: history of planes was such that ….
INCORRECTl SO new SUCH THAT
“Yet” is used when
the 2nd phrase happens DESPITE the 1st phrase
Who’s countable
Much vs many
many
Who’s countable
More, most
Works with both countable and not countable nouns
Who’s countable
Few vs little
Few
Who’s countable
Enough vs all
Works with both countable and not countable
Who’s countable
Fewer vs Less
Fewer
Ex: 10 items or fewer, not less
Who’s countable
Least vs Fewest
Fewest
Who’s countable
Number vs amount
Number
Who’s countable
Great vs Numerous
Numberous
Ex: Numerous books
Great courage
present perfect (has/have) can’t
appear in sentence twice, unless there’s a different time period for the two
In Sc, when you see alternating tense (did and having done)
Watch for incorrect tense
Past tense shouldn’t go with present perfect (having done) if it’s referring to something in the past
when you see “such” “that” BEWARE
Correct: so [adjective like awesome] that ….
Correct: history of planes was such that ….
INCORRECTl SO new SUCH THAT
when you see so new “for” + xxx
xx should be a person, not object (this is so new for a plane, meaning is incorrect)
turn to you for help TO BUY or IN BUYING
for help in buying
When you see “that” inserted, watch out for
change in meaning
watch for an object (“plan”) with a human action - ex: plan can’t suggest
trick for testing “from which”
switch it
the table from which she stole the food
she stole the food from the table (replace which )
When you see prepositional phrases
eliminate them to get core, but make sure the subject verb makes sense!
Ex: proliferation (of computer games) was 1st developed - doesn’t make sense, drop prolif
When you see semi colons or lots of commas, check for
comma splices, run ons
the number of which - which refers to
must refer to a noun stated before (can’t be wolves’ population if it’s supposed to be “wolves”)
when you see modifiers, check for
meaning - sometimes, it doesn’t make sense (“when” means when A, B happens), but if A and B happen simultaneously, can’t use “when”
when you see a noun modifier (starts with “who”, “which”, “that”, “where”, etc.)
look for the noun that it modifies (must be close)
seldom more than X BUT / AND Y
contrasting point so use “BUT”
seldom more than 2 ft tall BUT 200 lbs
has been found + _____
to be
If you’re stuck between 2 choices and don’t know about grammar, make sure to check
meaning of the sentences (does the noun of the modifier make sense)
!! CR - watch out for equations, when you see
- wages and output, think…
# of hours spent to build R*T=D or Work
CR - when you see questions in choices, evaluate the arg
If yes / no, must destroy or support the arg (nothing weak)
CR - when they use analogy to support a concl, question if
Is analogy applicable. good place to test assumption, weaken / strengthen arg
if question has not more likely, you can sub
just as likely so it’s eaiser to understand
!! Marc’s 3 tricks / techniques for CR
- Therefore test to find concl
- Negation technique to test assumption (Find assumption Qs) –> ESP when you see a “none/no”. Does negated choice destroy concl?
- -> Weaken Q - negation should change from weaken (Q as is) to strengthen - . Plug in choices (if assumpion Q) to see if it makes sense with concl