verb tense, mood & voice Flashcards
What is wrong?
Cherenkov radiation is light that particles are emitting when they are travelling faster than the effective speed of light in any medium.
Progressive Tenses
Cherenkov radiation is light that particles EMIT when they TRAVEL faster than the effective speed of light in any medium.
Do not use the Present Progressive for general definitions. Instead, use the Simple Present.
What is wrong?
Quentin is meeting Harvey for lunch tomorrow.
Progressive tenses
Quentin WILL MEET Harvey for lunch tomorrow.
In GMAT sentences, do not use the Present Progressive to indicate future actions. This usage is considered too colloquial. Instead, use the Simple Future.
What is wrong?
This inscription is signifying the emperor’s birth.
Progressive Tenses
This inscription SIGNIFIES the emperor’s birth.
Verbs that express general states do not normally take progressive forms. Such State Verbs include know or signify.
What is the difference the 2 sentences bellow?
- She was playing with her friends when the babysitter arrived.*
- She played with her friends when the babysitter arrived.*
Keep verbs consistent
She was playing with her friends when the babysitter arrived.
the action was playing (in the Past Progressive) takes place in the background. Arrived (in the Simple Past) is the interrupting foreground event.
She played with her friends when the babysitter arrived.
In this case, the action played took place after the babysitter arrived. Both actions are in the Simple Past and express equal levels of importance.
What is wrong?
- This country enforced strict immigration laws for thirty years.*
- They knew each other since 1987.*
Present Perfect: Still in effect…
- This country HAS ENFORCED strict immigration laws for thirty years.*
- They HAVE KNOWN each other since 1987.*
Each example involves an action that began in the past and continues into the present.
In each case, the idea of “continuing action” is reinforced by a time phrase, such as for thirty years or since 1987.
We use the Present Perfect tense for actions that started in the past but continue into the present, or remain true in the present.
Spot the wrong sentence and explain the difference in meaning among the others
- The child has drawn a square in the sand.*
- The child drew a square in the sand, but the ocean erased it.*
- The child drew a square in the sand, but the ocean has erased it.*
- The child has drawn a square in the sand, but the ocean has erased it.*
Present Perfect: still in effect…
The child has drawn a square in the sand.
the child is no longer drawing, but the square remains.
The child drew a square in the sand, but the ocean erased it.
the child is no longer drawing, and we don´t know the state of the sand.
The child drew a square in the sand, but the ocean has erased it.
the child is no longer drawing, and the sand is square free.
Awkward: The child has drawn a square in the sand, but the ocean has erased it.
What is wrong?
Since 1986 no one broke the world record.
Present Perfect: still in effect…
Since 1987 no one has broken the world record.
If you use since, you must use the Present Perfect to indicate continued action or effect.
Likewise, Present Perfect should be used with within phrases, such as within the past five minutes or within the last ten days, to indicate continued action or continued effect.
What is wrong?
Veronica has traveled all over the world in 2007
Present Perfect: still in effect…
Veronica TRAVELED all over the world in 2007.
to talk about a specific, completed time period, use the Simple Past, not the Present Perfect.
Note that it is fine to write Veronica has traveled all over the world and omit any specific, completed time reference. In this case, you are making a statement about Veronica _ (the kind of person she is, her experience and qualities, etc.).
What is the difference in the sequence of events?
- She will pay you when you ask her.*
- She will pay you when you have taken out the garbage.*
Present Perfect: still in effect…
She will pay you when you ask her.
the time of will pay = the time of [will] ask; note that the future will is often dropped in subordinate clauses
She will pay you when you have taken out the garbage.
(the time of will pay is LATER than the future time of have taken)
Which is wrong? Explain the sequence of events
The film started by the time we arrived at the theater.
The film had started by the time we arrived at the theater.
The film started by the time we had arrived at the theater.
Past Perfect: the earlier action
The film started by the time we arrived at the theater.
The film started at the same time we arrived.
The film had started by the time we arrived at the theater.
The film started before we arrived.
**WRONG: **The film started by the time we had arrived at the theater.
There is no earlier action to arrived to compare with.
Use Past Perfect only to clarify or emphasize a sequence of past events. The earlier event should somehow have a bearing on the context of the later event. Moreover, if the sequence is already obvious, we often do not need Past Perfect.
What is wrong?
- Antonio had droven to the store and bought some ice cream.*
- Antonio had droven to the store, and Cristina bought some ice cream.*
Past Perfect: the earlier action
Antonio DROVE to the store and BOUGHT some ice cream.
A sequence of verbs with the same subject does not require Past Perfect. Rather, use the Simple Past for all the verbs.
We already know that drove happened before bought.
Antonio DROVE to the store, and Cristina BOUGHT some ice cream.
Clauses linked by and or but do not require the Past Perfect as a general rule.
In the sentence above, which has two main clauses linked by and, we are not emphasizing the order of events (although drove probably happened before bought).
What is wrong?
Laura locked the dead bolt before she left for work.
Past Perfect: the earlier action
Laura LOCKED the dead bolt before she LEFT for work.
Nothing is wrong. We already know that locked happens before left because of the word before.The words before and after indicate the sequence of events clearly and emphatically enough to make the use of the Past Perfect unnecessary.
Explain the sequence of events
- By 1945, the United States had been at war for several years.*
- The band U2 was just one of many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980’s, but less than ten years later, U2 had fully eclipsed its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.*
Past Perfect: the earlier action
By 1945, the United States had been at war for several years.
The later past event does not need to be expressed with a Simple Past tense verb. You could just use a date or another time reference.
The band U2 was just one of many new groups on the rock music scene in the early 1980’s, but less than ten years later, U2 had fully eclipsed its early rivals in the pantheon of popular music.
you can even make a tricky sentence in which the first clause expresses an early action in Simple Past. Then, a second clause expresses a later action in
Past Perfect to indicate continued effect (by a still later past time).
What is wrong?
Joe learned about an epoch in which dinosaurs had walked the earth.
Past Perfect: the earlier action
Joe LEARNED about an epoch in which dinosaurs WALKED the earth.
the Past Perfect had walked is unnecessary. Although the action had walked does take place earlier than the action learned, the earlier action does not have a direct bearing on the context of the later action. The sequence of time does not need to be clarified or emphasized.
Make a report of the quotation bellow
Scientist:“The supercollider is ready, it did not cost too much, and it will provide new insights into the workings of the universe.”
Tense Sequence
Report: The scientist ANNOUNCED that the supercollider WAS ready, that it HAD not COST too much, and that it WOULD PROVIDE new insights into the workings of the universe.
The Simple Present tense (is) becomes the Simple Past (was).
The Simple Past tense (did … cost) becomes Past Perfect (had … cost). The action
becomes one step further removed’ from the present.
the Simple Future tense (will provide) becomes the Conditional Tense,
which is formed by combining would with the base form of the verb: would provide. The helping verb would expresses the future from the past’s point of view.
In these sorts of reporting sentences, avoid mixing Present tense with Conditional tense. Likewise, avoid mixing Past tense with Future tense. The usual sequences are EITHER
Present + Future OR Past + Conditional.
Wrong: The scientist BELIEVES that the machine WOULD BE wonderful.
Wrong: The scientist BELIEVED that the machine WILL BE wonderful.