Ventricular Assist Devices Flashcards
Carrell and Lindbergh and Demikhov
1930s Experimented with mechanical support in animal models
Gibbon
1953
O 1st use of CPB
O Inability to wean fueled interest in prolonged mechanical support in order to promote myocardial recovery
Spencer
1963 Reported using a roller pump to support a patient to recovery
O Roller pumps aren’t good VADS O Limitations
O Tethering, Blood trauma, Adjust pump speeds due to changes in heart pressures.
de bakey
1966 O 1st successful clinical application of a true
VAD
O Pneumatically driven diaphragm pump
O Paracorporeal O LA to Axillary Artery
O 37yo patient who could not be weaned from CPB s/p AVR/MVR
O Supportedfor10days O Weaned and Discharged
Klaus
- Introduced the concept of atrial counter
pulsation
O Rapid systolic unloading of the ventricle with diastolic augmentation.
O Lead to the development of the balloon pump which was developed in 1963 and applied clinically in 1967.
1958–
O Total artificial heart was used in a dog model O Supported for 90 min.
1962
Reporting survival up to 24 hours with TAH
cooley
1969 – 1st used a TAH to temporarily support a patient to transplant O 47yo man with failure to wean from CPB s/p LV Aneurysm repair O TAH had only been tested for up to 12 hours in an animal model O Implanted the “Liotta Heart” which was a pneumatic device O Supported the patient for 64 hours.
first in the world to implant a permanent TAH on 12/2/1982.
university of Utah
Jarvik 7 TAH performed by
Dr. William DeVries
first person to receive TAH
Implanted into Dr. Barney Clark, 61 yo dentist with
end stage idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
O Died of complications from aspiration pneumonia, Renal failure, colitis with septicemia.
O Was supported for 112 days.
5 patients received permanent TAH under FDA trial
O Longest survival
620 days
– Copeland at the University of
Arizona
- 1st planned TAH implant as a Bridge to Transplant (BTT)
Syncardia, Cardiowest – Tucson, AZ
Drs.OlsenandCopelandrevivedthe
model
O Modifiedandrenamed–Cardiowest C70
O Received FDA Approval as a BTT in 2004
Norman
1978 Device used for 5 days of support O Intracorporeal pneumatic device O Patient died of multi-organ system failure s/p transplant.
Early 1980s
ansplantation became a widely applied therapy.
O 30% of patients died on the list
O Became an incentive to develop devices that could be used for patients with acute cardiac decompensation while awaiting transplantation.
1980–NIHsentoutrequestforproposals
To develop an “implantable, integrated, electrically powered left heart assist system” that could be used on a long term basis and allow extensive patient mobility.
9/1984–StanfordUniversity
Oyer and Colleagues – Implanted the Novacor
LVAD O 1st successful transplant s/p BTT with LVAD
O Followed by Hill and colleagues who implanted a Pearce-Donachey pneumatic LVAD.
1992 – Frazier and colleagues
1st to report successful BTT with Thoratec
Heartmate IP VAD O Implantable pneumatic
O Restorednearnormalhemodynamics.
limitations of thoratec heartmate ip
O Devicesdependentonlargeconsolesforpower and controller function
O Patients confined to hospital until transplantation despite being fully ambulatory.
Kormos at University of Pittsburg
1990 Developed a program to transfer VAD patients to a monitored outpatient setting until transplantation.
Frazier at Texas Heart Institute
1991 First to use an untethered vented electric LVAD for long term support
O 33y/opatient O Battery operated Heartmate VE O 500 days of support O Patient died of embolic cerebral vascular accident.
1990s – FDA sponsored
several multi- institution trials of assist devices as bridge to transplant and bridge to recovery.
1994 – Heartmate
LVAD was the first FDA approved implantable device for bridge to transplant.
Biological Barriers to VAD design
Blood versus Foreign surface
O Blood contact surface cannot harm the patient
O Minimum generation of blood clots
Changes to patients anticoagulation and immune system over time in response to the mechanical pump
O Coagulopathy immediately after implantation because of bypass
O Period of hypercoagulability
O Returning to baseline
Pharmacologic modifications
(Heparin, Coumadin, ASA)
O Need to anticoagulate on some level.
Indications for VAD
O Bridge to Transplant
Worsening hemodynamics despite high level of IV inotropic support and/or vasodilator therapy or refractor arrhythmias.
Indications for VAD Destination Therapy
Patients who are not transplant candidates. Have an EF less than 25% and NYHA Class IV symptoms despite optimal therapy.
Contraindications
High surgical risk O Recent/evolving stroke O Neurological deficits impairing the ability to manage device O Coexisting terminal condition O Abdominal aortic aneurysm (greater than 5 cm) O Active infection O Fixed pulmonary hypertension O Severe pulmonary dysfunction O Multisystem organ failure O Inability to tolerate anticoagulation O HIT O Psychiatric illness O Lack of social support O pregnancy
design requirements
Devices need to be configured for their eventual application
O Shorter term versus partial assist versus long term support versus total support.
O Different uses and device requirements impact design. O Anatomicallycompatible
O Used over large variations in body mass, chest size/ shape, abdominal girth, etc.
O Structurally stable in a corrosive saline environment O Operate continuously without regular maintenance for
years. O Cannot fail under increased stress conditions O Reduce power requirements to save battery life O Must be efficient – reduce heat waste.
2 different types of pumps
Positive displacements O Usually pneumatic
O Rotary
Comparison of Pump Types
Prime Volume:
Positive Displacement: Large Prime Volume O Rotary: Smaller Prime Volu
flow ranges for different pump types
Both plagued with thrombosis with decreased flow and hemolysis with increased flow
afterload differences between pumps
Positive Displacement: Unaffected by changes in
afterload O Rotary: Flow drops with increased SVR
preload differences between pumps
Positive Displacement: Passive filling, output
follows venous return
O Rotary: Flow increases with increased VR, but no active suction applied
Positive Displacement pumps
O Propels fluid by
changing the internal volume of a pumping chamber.
O Compression of a sac/membrane, etc. O Provides pulsatile flow O Requires 1 way valves to produce forward flow
Positive Displacement pumps specs
Flow is about 5-10 liters per minute O Mean bp = 100-150 mmHg O Rate is <120 bpm O Mean filling pressure is appx 20mmHg.`
Thoratec PVAD/IVAD
FDA Approved as a BTT since 1995 O Provides support for the right, left or both
ventricles.
10% of thoratec Lvad will need
RVAD
BiVAD is common after
transplant failure, postpartum Cardiomyopathy, Acute MI, Myocarditis. Used least with idiopathic CM and Ischemic CM.
According to the Thoratec Registry, 25% received BiVAD support with
hybrid RVAD and LVAD or Thoratec BiVAD.
BiVADusehasincreased
18%since2000.
Preop risk factors for RHF
Hemodynamics – Low CI with inc. RA pressure not necessarily an indicator of Rt. Heart failure.
O May improve when LV is unloaded with LVAD
O Ability of RV to generate pressure
O Low pulse pressure with high CVP – indicator of BiVAD
Indicators of BiVAD
Early insertion of LVAD before significant major organ dysfunction
O Less likely to need RVAD too. O Higher pre-op bilirubin O Higher pre-op creatinine
O Normalize w/in 2-3 weeks after implant of VAD O Emergent Implant O Intraop Bleeding
O Greater transfusion requirements increases pulmonary vascular resistance and promotes the development of right heart failure.
O Post op bleeding is common for BiVAD patients O Related to the severity of hepatic failure
Thoratec PVAD/IVAD STROKE VOLUME
65 mL
Thoratec PVAD/IVAD BEATS/FLOW
40-110bpm, 1.3-7.2Lpm