Valve - aortic Flashcards
What are the different surgical approaches for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement?
right anterior thoracotomy, upper versus lower partial sternotomy
Disadvantages of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement
Longer crossclamp and bypass times
advantages of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement
Cosmesis
Possible decrease blood loss, ventilator requirement, and hospital stay
Most common bicuspid aortic valve morphology
2 commissures oriented anteroposterior; giving left and right cusps
Most rare bicuspid aortic valve morphology
Fusion of the left and non-coronary cusps
Bicuspid aortic valve classification
Sievers classification; based on how many raphe
Sievers type 0
No raphe; true bicuspid
Sievers type 1
1 raphe; either L-R, R-N, N-L. This is the most common type. Likely to develop stenosis in adulthood.
Sievers type 2
2 raphe; either L-R, R-N. This usually leads to complication at a younger age
Mechanism of deterioration of prosthetic bovine pericardial valve
80% stenosis from dystrophic calcification
Mechanism of deterioration of prosthetic porcine pericardial valve
Leaflet tears and aortic regurgitation (80%) due to calcification
Which is better (bioprosthetic or mechanical valve) for patients >65 years
No difference
How long does a mechanical valve last?
15-25 years
How long does a bioprosthetic valve last?
10-14 years
Patients undergoing CABG with concomitant aortic stenosis should have AV replacement only if?
the aortic stenosis is moderate or severe (class I)
Patients undergoing CABG with concomitant mild aortic stenosis may have AV replacement only if?
there is evidence of rapid progression
Bioprosthetic valve lifespan
Tissue valves in the mitral position generally deteriorate more quickly than in the aortic position.
Also deteriorate more quickly in younger patients
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) stroke risk
~1.5 % in STS database (2.4% in partner trial)
What is thought to be the cause of Aortic valve replacement (AVR) stroke risk
Aortic cross-clamping
High stroke risk factors for Aortic valve replacement (AVR)
STS Risk > 10% Age > 80 Presence of aortic calcifications Addition of CABG or other procedures Ejection fraction <40%
Most common Bicuspid Aortic Valve configuration
Right-left cusp fusion: 2 commissures located in AP direction, giving right and left cusp. Associated with root dilation. In contrast, the left and non-coronary fusion is the rarest.
Bicuspid aortic valve with right-non coronary fusion configuration
Has 2 commissures on the right and left sides of the annulus, which creates anterior and posterior cusps
Associated with ascending and arch dilation.
In patients with bicuspid valve and has a valve-related indication for surgery, what aortic size should warrant an aortic replacement?
> 4.5 cm
In patients with bicuspid valve and has no valve-related indication for surgery, what aortic size should warrant an aortic replacement?
aortic diameter > 5 cm, or change in diameter >0.5 cm in 1 year