Valuations Flashcards
What is the process of conducting a valuation?
- Determine the purpose of the valuation and users
- Consider the previous valuation
- Collect data
- Set appropriate basis
- Perform valuation calculations
- Check against previous valuation
Different types of claims
Attributional claims: Present a high frequency but lower severity
Large claims: Present a low frequency but high severity
Future latent claims: These are claims that have yet to emerge
CAT claims: claims that arise from catastrophic events, such as natural disasters
What is stressed scenario for liquidity risk?
think actual cashflows
- premium collection delays
- increases in claim payments
- increases in expenses
- investment market performance is poor
What is a stressed scenario for credit risk?
- increase in default probabilities
- recover rates drop
- there is high correlations between counterparties/asset classes
What is a stressed scenario for underwriting risk?
What are the principles of valuations?
Complete, Consistent (2) , Disclosed, Prudent, Assumption, Proportional.
- Complete - liabilities include guarantees, options, expenses and obligated premiums.
- Consistent - between valuations, passive approaches are less frequency but active align more with market-consistent.
- Consistent - liabilities should be valued in a market-consistent way so align with assets.
- Prudence - depending on purpose should allow for appropriate degree of prudence.
- Assumptions - should be suitable, sufficiently prudent and consistent over time (usually economic disclosed but demographic can vary between entity)
- Proportionality - simplifications to valuation techniques and approximations may be justified by the principle of proportionality.
- Disclosed - the method and basis of valuation should be disclosed.
What is the best estimate liability in different scenarios?
health insurer:
- outstanding claims reserve (IBNR + RBNA + ABNS or other)
- policy reserve (risk reserve + expense reserve)
retirement fund
- liability of active members
- liability of pensioner members
- liability of deferred members
- liability of members exiting the fund
Why do we need to do valuations?
- to determine appropriate contribution rate required (social security scheme, DB fund)
- to assess appropriate level of contingency reserves
- to check health of the benefit arrangement (solvency level, funding level, long term financial position)
- determine source of surplus (DB funds, DC funds just due to operational issues)
- to analyse progress between valuations
Funding choice considerations
EAM
- if age at entry of new members = assumed age at entry, SCR is stable
- if age at entry of new members > assumed age at entry, deficit created.
- when recalculate using new age at entry, SCR will increase and AL will decrease.
- SCR increases because need to pay same benefits in shorter period of time.
- AL decreases, because SCR increases, so lower fund needed now to ensure benefits paid at retirement.
AAM
- assumes there are no new members
- aims to produce stable contribution rate over active lifetime of member
- the cost of benefit accrual will increase with age, as members gets closer to retirement
- there is a surplus built up in the early years of membership (contributions outweighs accrued benefit), which is drawn on at the later years (accrued benefit outweighs contributions).
- the contribution rate is a weighted average of contribution rates of members of different ages and salaries.
When is AAM preferred to PUM?
- AAM aims to produce stable contribution rate for members over their ‘active’ lifetime.
- AAM tends to build up surpluses in early years, which is drawn on in later years to keep contribution rates stable.
- PUM gives the ‘correct’ cost of the accrued benefits, but AAM overstates the cost in its contribution rate.
- AAM is preferred when the fund is seeking stability, as less likely to default payments to members.
- However, PUM might be better in terms of flexibility, and can avoid the opportunity costs that come with holding surpluses.
AAM has a relationship to both PUM and EAM contribution rates.
- AAM = EAM when the age of all members at entry = assumed at age entry [start]
- AAM contribution rate is same at start when the existing age of individuals is the assumed entry age
- AAM contribution rate is higher when average age of individuals is the same assumed entry age
- although the average age is the same, the average contribution rate is not.
- AAM contribution rate is a weighted-average of contribution rates, of members of the same age and salary. As the later changes, so does the contribution rate.
- AAM = PUM when the control period = the number of years to retirement [end]
- AAM contribution rate is typically higher, due to surplus building up.
- PUM contribution rate is more reflective of cost of benefits accrued over time.
What is a fully-funded system?
- system where liabilities are fully funded
- don’t rely on future members to pay for the benefits of current members
- each generation must set aside money to pay own benefits
- accumulated contributions and investment income should be enough to pay benefits at all times.
- if deficit arises, they should be amortised over a fixed period of time.
- all retirement funding methods are fully-funded provided: contributions actually paid, assumptions are borne in practice, or both are updated regularly.
- this is more prevalent in private pension world (rather than state) because is protects members against pension fund ending.
- this approach goes against the notion of intergenerational solidarity
What is a mature fund/system?
- when the number of recipients relative to the number of contributors is constant
- when a fund/system just introduced, often a lot of contributors and few recipients
- as fund/system matures, the number of contributors and recipients increase
- if the projected population distribution assumed when the fund/system was set up, actually pans out, the number of contributions vs. recipients will be as expected, and so will the cost of benefit.
- often ageing populations can be an issue, causing cost of benefits > expected.
> lower fertility: more pensioners vs. working class
> higher longevity: pensions paid for longer than expected