Valuation questions Flashcards
what are 3 major valuation methods?
- Comparable companies
- Precedent transactions
- discounted cash flow analysis
rank from highest to lowest expected value - difficult to determine
–usually Precedent transactions will be higher than comparable companies bc of the control premium built into acquisitions
DCF could be high or low - very variable bc a lot is based on assumptions
when would you NOT use a DCF in valuation?
do not use a DCF if the company has unstable or unpredictable cash flows (tech or bio-tech startup) or when debt and working capital serve a fundamentally different role
—For example, banks and financial institutions do not re-invest debt and working capital is a huge part of their Balance Sheets – so you wouldn’t use a DCF for such companies.
- DCF analysis
finding intrinsic value - the actual value of a company or asset based on both tangible and intangible factors (may not be the same as current market value)
- Comparable companies analysis
Looking at what other comparable companies are worth (relative valuation
also called “PEER GROUP ANALYSIS” TRADING MULTIPLES”
–you compare the current value of a business to other similar businesses by looking at trading multiples
–“comps” method provides value for business based on what companies are currently worth - easy to calculate and current
3 ways to select companies and transactions (for 3)
- industry classification (most important!! always used to screen for companies/transactions)
- financial criteria (Revenue, EBITDA)
- geography
ex. screen: oil & gas producers with market caps over $5 billion
- -or digital media companies with over $100 million in revenue
flaws with method:
- -no comp. is 100% comparable to another comp.
- -stock market is “emotional” - multiples might be dramatically higher or lower on certain dates depending on market’s movement
- -share prices for small comp. with thinly-traded stocks may not reflect their full value
- Precedent transactions analysis
relative valuation method - compare company in question to other businesses that have recently sold or acquired in the same industry - the transaction values include the take-over premium included in the price for which they were acquired
limit the set based on date and only look at transactions within past 1-2 years
–most important factor is industry!! - ALWAYS used
ex. screening: airline M&A transactions over past 2 years involving sellers with over $1 billion in revenue
- -or retail M&A transactions over the past year
flaws with method:
- -past transactions are rarely 100% comparable - transaction structure, size of company, market sentiment all have huge effects
- -date on precent transactions more diff. to find that it is for public company comparables - especially for acquisitions of small private companies
What other Valuation methodologies are there?
- liquidation valuation
- replacement value
- –Valuing a company based on the cost of replacing its assets - LBO analysis
- Sum of parts
- M&A Premiums analysis
- -Analyzing M&A deals and figuring out the premium that each buyer paid, and using this to establish what your company is worth - ## Future share price analysis• Future Share Price Analysis – Projecting a company’s share price based on the P / E multiples of the public company comparables, then discounting it back to its present value
other valuation 1. liquidation valuation
Valuing a company’s assets, assuming they are sold off and then subtracting liabilities to determine how much capital, if any, equity investors receive
most common in bankruptcy scenarios and is used to see whether equity shareholders will receive any capital after the company’s debts have been paid off. It is often used to advise struggling businesses on whether it’s better to sell off assets separately or to try and sell the entire company
other valuation 4. sum of parts
Valuing each division of a company separately and adding them together at the end
used when a company has completely different, unrelated divisions
- -Ex. General Electric,
- -If you have a plastics division, a TV and entertainment division, an energy division, a consumer financing division and a tech division, you should not use the same set of Comparable Companies and Precedent Transactions for the entire company
- –Instead, you should use different sets for each division, value each one separately, and then add them together to get the Combined Value.
- Other valuation - 3. LBO analysis
Determining how much a PE firm could pay for a company to hit a
“target” IRR, usually in the 20-25% range
Obviously you use this whenever you’re looking at a Leveraged Buyout – but it is also used to establish how much a private equity firm could pay, which is usually lower than what companies will pay.
It is often used to set a “floor” on a possible Valuation for the company you’re looking at.
What are the most common multiples used in Valuation?
EV/Revenue EV/EBITDA EV/EBIT P/E (Share Price / Earnings per Share) P/BV (Share Price / Book Value)
would an LBO or DCF give a higher valuation?
either way…but usually LBO
will give LOWER valuation
–in LBO…don’t get any value from cash flows btwn yr. 1 and final year - only valuing based on its terminal value
–but with DCF…take into account BOTH comp. cash flows in btwn and its terminal value
Note: Unlike a DCF, an LBO model by itself does not give a specific valuation. Instead, you set a desired IRR and determine how much you could pay for the company (the valuation) based on that.
How would you present these Valuation methodologies to a company or its investors?
“football field” chart - show valuation range - ALWAYS show range rather than one specific number
–shown valuation in diff. ranges under diff. assumptions
create using minimum to maximum multiples
How would you value an apple tree?
The same way you would value a company: by looking at what comparable apple trees are worth (relative valuation) and the value of the apple tree’s cash flows (intrinsic valuation)
Why can’t you use Equity Value / EBITDA as a multiple rather than Enterprise Value / EBITDA?
bc there is a certain line on income stmt…and above that line information is available to everyone - debt and equity holders - but under EBT line…it only involves equity
- -have to compare apples to apples - EBITDA is available to all investors in company and so is enterprise value
- -equity value is information only available to equity holders so it is not comparing apples to apples - equity value does not reflect the company’s entire capital structure (only part available to equity holders)
With levered and unlevered free cash flow when would you use equity value or enterprise value
unlevered free cash flows excludes interest - therefore represents money available to ALL investors - so use enterprise value
levered free cash flows - includes interest expense - so it is money only available to EQUITY investors - so use equity value multiples
–debt investors have already “been paid” with interest pmts. they received
How do you apply the 3 valuation methodologies to actually get a value for the
company you’re looking at?
take the median multiple of a set of companies or transactions, and then multiply it by the relevant metric from the company you’re valuing.
- –ex. if median EBITDA multiple from precedent transactions is 8x and company’s EBITDA is $500 million - the implied enterprise value would be $4 billion
- -for football field valuation graph…you look at the min., max., 25th percentile and 75th percentile in each set and create a range of values based on each methodology
what do you actually use a valuation for?
Usually you use it in pitch books and in client presentations when you’re providing updates and telling them what they should expect for their own valuation
also be used in defense analyses, merger models, LBO models, DCFs (because terminal multiples are based off of comps), and pretty much anything else in finance.
Why would a company with similar growth and profitability to its Comparable Companies be valued at a premium?
This could happen for a number of reasons:
• The company has just reported earnings well-above expectations and its stock price has risen recently.
• It has some type of competitive advantage not reflected in its financials, such as a key patent or other intellectual property.
• It has just won a favorable ruling in a major lawsuit.
• It is the market leader in an industry and has greater market share than its
competitors.
Do you always use the median multiple of a set of public company comparables or precedent transactions?
no rule..but usually want values from middle range of the set
–but if comp. you are valuing is distressed - or at competitive disadvantage - might use 25th percentile in lower range instead