Valuation Basic Flashcards
What are the three major valuation methodologies?
Comparable companies, precedent transactions and discounted cash flow analysis
Comps value of a company by comparing it to similar companies
Precedent prices paid for similar companies in the past
DCF value of investment based on future cash flow then discounted to present value using appropriate discount rate
Rank the three valuation methodologies from highest to lowest expected value?
Trick question no set ranking or one that holds
Precedent transactions will be higher than comparable companies due to the control, premium built into acquisitions
The acquirer usually wants to own more than 50% of the shares they want to control the business not own a part of its equity
A DCF could go either way and it’s best to say that it’s more variable than other methodologies
It often produces the highest value, but it can produce the lowest value as well, depending on your assumptions.
Precedent transactions often produces highest valuation because it includes control premium that a buyer must pay. This is the amount that a buyer is willing to pay an excess of the fair market value of shares to gain any controlling ownership interest. It’s influenced by potential value increasing competition from other buyers.
The DCF depends on assumptions
And the comparable companies analysis is a market based valuation that usually produces the lowest value as it is based on what the market is currently willing to pay.
When would you not use a DCF in a valuation?
If a company has unstable or unpredictable, cash flows tech or biotech startups or when debt and working capital serve a fundamentally different role
Unpredictable revenue delayed payments, unexpected expenses, inefficient cash management
Banks and financial institutions do not reinvest debt and working capital is a huge part of their balance sheet
Over complexity, large number of assumptions, sensitive to change in assumptions also company isolation.
What other valuation methodologies are there?
Liquidation valuation valuing a companies assets, assuming they are sold off and then subtracting liabilities to determine how much if any equity investors receive
If business is terminated and assets are sold off cash that would be received from selling off assets subtracting any liabilities
Replacement valuation valuing a company based on the cost of replacing assets. How much does it cost to replace a TV with a similar one?
LBO analysis determining how much a private equity firm could pay for a company to hit a target internal rate of return IRR usually in the 20 to 25% range, maximum value a financial buyer could pay for the target company.
Sum of the parts valuing each division of a company separately, and adding them together at the end, think of conglomerates and holding companies example Amazon
M & A premium analysis most acquisitions are competitive analyzing mergers and acquisitions deals and figuring out the premium that each buyer paid and using this to establish what your company is worth
To access on acquirer pays over the market value of the shares, being acquired often used in negotiations for a fair purchase price and a fairness opinions
Future share price analysis projecting a company share price based on the price to earnings multiples of the public company comparables, then discounting it back to its present value think of compound annual growth rate predicting future prices by looking at things like price, movements, charts, trends, trading values and other factors
Overall, all these valuation methodologies are to the industry kind of what what valuation do you use for? What type of company?
When would you use a liquidation valuation bringing a business to an end?
Chapter 7 bankruptcy most common in bankruptcy scenarios and is used to see whether equity shareholders will receive any capital after the companies debt has been paid off
It is often used to advise struggling businesses on whether it’s better to sell off assets separately or to try and sell the entire company
Bankruptcy how much can be recovered
M and A worst-case scenario value of the company
Selling the company to set a minimum price for sale restructuring, and recapitalization
When would you use sum of the parts?
Most often used when a company has completely different unrelated divisions
A conglomerate like general electric, one business consisting of several different companies
If you have a plastic division, a TV and entertainment division and division, a consumer financing division and a technology division, etc.
You should not use the same set of comparable companies and precedent transactions for the entire company
Instead, you should use different sets for each division value each one separately and then add them together to get the combined value distinct assets restructuring value of each business unit
When do you use an LBO analysis as part of your valuation?
Obviously, when you’re looking at a leveraged buyout using debt to buy a company
How much could be paid for the business while still achieving a desired IRR?
Also used to establish how much a private equity firm could pay, which is usually lower than what companies will pay
Often used to set a floor on a possible valuation for the company you’re looking at
In investment banking LBO analysis to get LBO market value as a limit minimum value for company valuation minimum amount of equity
In private equity determining highest possible risk
What are the most common multiples used in valuation?
EV/revenue early stage or high-growth businesses that don’t have earnings yet
EV/EBITDA value of a company EV representing total value EBITDA representing operating performance
EBIT/EV this is the earnings yield ROI based on operating profit and cost by entire company
P/E price to earnings this is the share price divided by your earnings per share stock over or undervalued
P/BV share price divided by book value per share that shows how much investors are prepared to pay per unit of net assets
Why can’t you use enterprise value divided by net income? Net income is included in stockholders equity, which is in enterprise value.
What are some examples of industry specific multiples?
EV/unique investors
EV/page viewers
These relate to tech and Internet
You use industry specific multiples when you don’t have good stable, financial data or you have unique assets making revenue so early in and more impactful industry, specific private you know different things publicly available
Retail airlines use EV/EBITDAR R standing for rental expenses
Energy uses things like EV/EBITDAX standing for exploration expense
They also use EV/daily production
And EV/proved reserve quantities
Real estate investment trust REITs
Price/FFO per share funds from operations
Price/AFFO per share adjusted funds from operations
Tech and energy, you are looking at and energy resources as drivers rather than revenue or profit,
Retail airlines, you add back rent because some companies own their own buildings and capitalize the expense where others rent and have rental expenses
Energy, All value is derived from companies reserves of oil and gas, which explains EBITDAX because some companies capitalize their exploration expenses and some expense, then add back exploration expense to normalize the numbers
REITs FFO‘s is a common metric that adds back depreciation and subtracts gains on the sale of property depreciation is a non-cash yet extremely large expense in real estate and gains on sales of properties are assumed to be non-recurring so FFO is viewed as a normalized picture of the cash flow the REIT is generating.
When you’re looking at an industry specific multiple like EV/scientists or
EV/subscribers why do you use enterprise value rather than equity value?
You use enterprise value because the scientists or subscribers are available to all the investors both debt and equity in a company
Same logic does not apply to everything
You need to think through the multiple and see which investors the particular metric is available to
Enterprise value considers the company regardless of capital structure
Would an LBO or DCF give a higher valuation?
It could go either way most cases LBO gives you a lower valuation.
LBOs do not get any value from the cash flows of a company in between year one and the fiscal year
They are only based on terminal value valuing based on terminal value, which is the value today of all profits. This company will make from a certain point in the future and annually.
DCF taken into account both companies cash flows in between and it’s terminal value values tend to be higher, projectable, cash flow, optimistic assumptions
Unlike a DCF and LBO by itself does not give a specific valuation you get a desired IRR and determine how much you could pay for the company
How do you present these valuation methodologies to a company or its investors?
Usually a football field chart where you show the valuation range implied by each methodology always show a range rather than one specific number
Variety of bar charts line graph scatterplots, looking at share price
How would you value an apple tree?
Same way you would value a company look at what comparable Apple trees are worth and the value of the apple trees cash flows
Do you want a relative valuation which is the quick market informed assessment financial multiples, ratios, etc.
And you want an intrinsic valuation, which is projected cash flows companies, financial health and future potential DCF
Why can’t you use equity value/EBITDA as a multiple rather than enterprise value/EBITDA?
EBITDA is available to all investors in the company rather than just equity holders and enterprise value is also available to all shareholders so it makes sense to pair them together
Equity value/EBITDA is comparing apples to oranges because does it does not reflect companies entire capital structure only part available the equity investors
Equity value doesn’t consider debt or cash holdings enterprise value does equity value represents the claims of equity holders
The point of multiple is to represent value of enterprise value/ET gives you the value of a companies operations and its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
When would a liquidation valuation produce the highest value?
This is highly unusual given it to cyclical industry, but this happens if a company had substantial hard assets, but the market severely undervaluing it like an earnings miss cyclicality
Companies, comparable companies and precedents would likely produce lower values as well
And if assets were valued highly enough
Valuable tangible assets like real estate equipment inventory
Under performing business assets could potentially be worth more separately than the value generated by the same if a company could use the assets more efficiently
