Validity of Wills Flashcards

1
Q

what are the 3 requirements for a valid will?

A

1) testator has testamentary capacity

2) testator has knowledge and approval of contents in will

3) Will complies with formal requirements under s 9

also testator is 18+

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the 3 requirements of testamentary capacity under Banks v Goodfellow?

A

T will have testamentary capacity if they can:

1) understand the nature of the act and its effects = understand they are signing a document that takes effect on death and disposes of assets but no need to understand every detail

2) appreciate the extent of their property = general understanding of what they own and approximate value (not every asset)

3) appreciate moral claims against their estate and have no disorder of the mind affecting their faculties or judgement
- no need to leave anything for those with moral claims
- T will have a disorder meaning they lack testamentary capacity if their judgement is affected when it comes to dispositions in the will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

when is testamentary capacity presumed?

A

No statutory presumption of testamentary capacity

Common law presumption of testamentary capacity where:
(1) Will is duly executed
(2) Will appears rational on its face, and
(3) There is no reason to doubt the testator’s testamentary capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

if testamentary capacity is presumed, how does the burden of proof / disproving it shift?

A
  • burden of proof lies with the person seeking to admit the will into probate (executor)
  • common law presumotion of capacity applies
  • a person challenging its validity must provide evidence to raise doubt
  • then the burden of proof reverts to the person seeking to admit the will to probate (executor) to prove they had testamentary capacity based on Banks v Goodfellow
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When must a testator have testamentary capacity?

A

at execution of the will

unless parker v felgate applies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when can a testator still make a valid will if they did not have testamentary capacity at the time of execution? (parker v felgate)

A

a testator can still make a valid will if:

1) they had testamentary capacity at the time they gave instructions
2) the will was prepared in accordance with these instructions
3) at execution, testator understood they were signing a will for which they had previously given instructions

–> this applies where testator has fluctuating capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what should you do when taking instructions for a client who is elderly or seriously ill to ensure that the will will not be challenged for lack of testamentary capacity?

A

ask a medical practitioner to assess T’s capacity and provide a contemporaneous record of the assessment (BUT OBTAIN T’S CONSENT TO DO THIS FIRST)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the 2 requirements for T having knowledge and approval to execute a valid will?

A

requirements of knowledge and approval =
1) T has general intention to make a testamentary document +
2) T has specific intention to make THIS testamentary document = must know and approve of its contents

knowledge and approval must be at time of execution - unless Parker v Feldgate apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when is knowledge and approval presumed (3 requirements)?

A

presumption of knowledge and approval =
(1) T has testamentary capacity
(2) will was validly executed, AND
(3) T signed their own will having had the opportunity to read it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when is knowledge and approval not presumed?

A

NO presumption of knowledge and approval =
- T is blind
- T is illiterate
- T does not understand English
- T is physically incapable of signing
- someone signs on T’s behalf
- Suspicious circumstances

–> burden of proof shifts to the person seeking to enforce the will to demonstrate knowledge and approval (via ATTESTATION CLAUSE in will and/or AFFIDAVIT after will)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what can be done to prove knowledge and approval if it is not presumed? (2 options)

A
  1. Attestation clauses = Attestation clause should be amended to reflect any steps taken to ensure the testator had knowledge and approval. In this way, the attestation clause acts as evidence of knowledge and approval.
  2. Affidavits of knowledge and approval = If the presumption does not apply and the attestation clause does not expressly confirm that appropriate steps were taken, an affidavit of knowledge and approval should be submitted to the probate registry as part of the application for probate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

affidavits of knowledge and approval -

what are they?
what is their benefit?

A
  • Statement where the statement maker swears an oath of its veracity
  • Provide proof of due execution where there is no presumption of knowledge and approval, and the attestation clause does not address this
  • Affidavit is submitted when submitting the will to probate
  • example = affidavit of witness swearing that certain steps took place to ensure T had K&A e.g., where T hurt their hand and arranged for someone else to sign on their behalf
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

attestation clause for blind testator

A

Signed by the above named [testator] who is blind in our joint presence, and then by us in his/her presence after this document has been read over by [name] to [testator] when [testator] seemed to thoroughly understand and approve the contents’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

attestation clause for T who cannot sign themselves

A

Signed by A in T’s name and on behalf of T (who is physically incapable of signing), in the presence of both of us and at T’s direction, and then by us in their presence, when T seemed to thoroughly understand and approve of the contents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Undue influence affecting knowledge and approval

what is it?
who has the burden of proof?
what is the result of a finding of UI?

A
  • A will executed under the duress or undue influence does not reflect the true intention of the testator and therefore knowledge and approval will not be present, and the will is invalid.
  • what is it = T did not intend to make the will, was coerced against their judgement and contrary to their true intention, does not genuinely exercise choice, and was not a free agent. It is not mere persuasion or encouragement - eg, appealing to ties of love and affection or pity
  • consider the physical and mental strength of the testator = vulnerable testator may be more susceptible to UI
  • The burden of proof is with the person alleging duress or undue influence occurred
  • effect of UI = any gift or entire will made as a result of undue influence is INVALID
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are the 4 formal requirements for validity of wills under s 9 WA 1837?

A
  1. in writing and signed by T or by another person on T’s behalf in T’s physical presence and by his direction (sign = X/initials is enough) (third party can be anyone = beneficiary, attesting witness, solicitor)
  2. it appears that T intended to give effect to the will by his signature (shown if signed at the end)
  3. 2 adult witnesses must be present at the same time when T signs or when T acknowledges a signature they made in the past or one made on their behalf
  4. each witness must, in the presence of T, either attest and signs the will
  • witness does not need to sign in front of the other witness
  • but witness must sign in T’s presence
17
Q

if one witness steps out of the room while T signs the will, then comes back in and signs the will in T’s presence, is the will valid or invalid under s9?

A

a witness does not have to physically see the testator sign - the testator can simply acknowledge to the witnesses that they signed the will

18
Q

attestation clauses -

what is it?
is it necessary?
what is the benefit of having one? (2)

A
  • attestation clause = describes circumstances under which the will was executed
  • Not required for validity
  • Benefits = a properly drafted attestation clause
  1. raises a presumption that the will was executed in accordance with s9
  2. helps prove knowledge and approval when it is not presumed (T is blind, illiterate, unable to sign) = wording of clause must state that witnesses attest that T had knowledge and approval at time of execution
  • if attestation clause is poorly drafted get an affidavit of due execution from witnesses
19
Q

what presumption does an attestation clause raise?

A

presumption of duly executed will (in accordance with s9 validity requirements)

20
Q

s15 WA = what happens if a witness is a beneficiary or the spouse of a beneficiary

A
  • if a witness attesting is a beneficiary under the will or a spouse of a beneficiary under the will –> gifts made to the beneficiary are VOID
  • will remains valid AND any appointment of beneficiary as an executor remains valid
  • BUT - the gift remains valid if:
  1. there are 2 other witnesses not caught by s15 or
  2. a subsequent properly executed codicil is created and not executed by persons caught under s 15 (as it republishes will)
21
Q

if a professional executor witnesses a will, does s15 mean that they will not receive remuneration?

A

no - a professional executor is entitled to charge for their services and can act as a witness