Validity of the Will Flashcards
A will is valid so long as the testator:
Had testamentary capacity at the time they gave instructions for the preparation of the will; and
The will was prepared in accordance with those instructions; and
At the time of execution the testator understood they were signing a will for which they had previously given instructions.
There is no presumption of knowledge and approval where:
The testator is blind or illiterate (ie unable to read the will)
The will was signed by someone on behalf of the testator
There are suspicious circumstances (e.g. the will was prepared by a key beneficiary or their relative)
If there is no presumption of knowledge and approval
an affidavit is needed when submitting the will
The formalities of a valid will are:
To comply with s. 9 the will must be in writing and signed by the testator (or by someone else on his behalf)
The testator’s signature must be made or acknowledged in the presence of two adult witnesses with capacity
The witnesses must each sign the will in the presence of the testator but not necessarily in the presence of each other
The attestation clause in a will describes the circumstances under which the will was signed, but it is not a legal requirement to include one - just best practice
Can a beneficiary be an attesting witness?
Under this section any gifts to an attesting witness (or their spouse) are void.
What names should be included in a valid will?
If the testator owns assets in another name the grant of representation must refer to each possible alias. If it does not, it will not be possible to administer all of the estate and this causes delays.
Can a company be appointed as the executor of a will?
To appoint a law firm partnership all of the partners must be appointed (then expressly limit the number). An LLP and trust corporation may appointed directly.
How many executors are permitted for a valid will?
A minimum of 1 executor is required, but it is often better to appoint at least two in case a sole executor does not survive the deceased or is unwilling/unable to act. A maximum of 4 can apply for the grant of representation. If more than 4 are named in the will then power is ‘reserved’ to those who do not apply initially to apply later if any vacancy arises.
What is a contrary intention in a will?
A contrary intention can be demonstrated by the use of words such as ‘my’ (as you would see in a specific legacy), ‘now’, or ‘at present’ when describing a gift. These words make the date of execution of the will the relevant date. In both examples below the car the testator owned when they executed the will (not when they died) would be the subject matter of the gift. The second clause is preferable as it states this expressly.
I GIVE to [ ] my car absolutely
I GIVE to [ ] the car that I own at the date of my will
It is because the use of the ‘my’ is construed to be a contrary intention to the general rule in s 24 Wills Act that specific gifts have a significant risk of failure.
The gift will adeem if the testator no longer owns that car when they die and the beneficiary will receive nothing unless there is an express substitutional gift.
Unless otherwise expressly stated…
Items that comprise a collection are identified at the date of death
People are identified with reference to the date of execution
A gift in a will is made free of IHT
A specific gift is made subject to expenses and costs of transfer
A gift of property subject to a charge bears the liability of that charge
What is the class closing rule?
The general rule is that a class closes (i.e. the beneficiaries within the class are identified and no one born subsequently can qualify) when any one member of the class first becomes entitled in possession. For example:
I give £300 absolutely to each of my grandchildren who reach the age of 21
When the first grandchild reaches 21 the class of ‘grandchildren’ would close (this may be after the testator’s death). If the testator has grandchildren born subsequently these grandchildren would not be included.
Who can receive a gift in a will?
Adults. It is sometimes possible for a child aged 16 or 17 to give good receipt but only if there is an express clause within the will permitting this.
What is the IPFDA 1975 test?
Did the deceased fail to make reasonable financial provision for the applicant?
If so, what award should the court make?
What categories can the claimant fall into with IPFDA?
Maintenance standard and the surviving spouse standard. The key difference between the two standards is that the surviving spouse standard simply requires the court to consider what it would be reasonable for the applicant to receive, without any requirement to consider what is needed for their maintenance. This is clearly a higher standard than the maintenance standard.
What is considered under the maintenance standard?
Broadly, the courts consider the maintenance standard to require an assessment of what it would be reasonable for an applicant to live on (without either living in luxury or poverty). This is not the same thing as the actual standard of living that the claimant has enjoyed during the deceased’s lifetime (although this will be a relevant consideration).
The applicant’s financial resources and financial needs
The financial resources and financial needs of any other applicants
The financial resources and financial needs of any beneficiary of the estate
Any obligations and responsibilities which the deceased had towards any applicants or beneficiaries
The size and nature of the net estate of the deceased
Any physical or mental disability of any applicant or beneficiary
Any other matter the court considers relevant in the circumstances (including the conduct of the applicant or any other person)
When considering a person’s financial resources and needs, the court must take into account any resources and needs they are likely to have in the foreseeable future.