VA Fed Civ Pro Essays Rule Statements Flashcards
two hurdles to be cleared for personal jurisdiction standard
minimum contacts, reasonableness
minimum contacts balancing test
1) the quantity and nature of the d’s contacts with the forum
2) their connection with the cause of action
3) interest of forum in protecting its citizens
not accidental, personally availed themselves
putting a product into the stream of commerce, knowing it might eventually end up in a particular state
not sufficent for in personam jurisdiction over manufacturer or seller, Asahi
with in personam jurisdiction, the court first looks to ______, and then it must determine
the long arm statute to determine its jurisdictional bounds, and then it must determine whether the exercise of jurisdiction satisfies due process
under international shoe
court must look to whetehr there are minimum contacts between the forum state and out of state defendant so that the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice
objections to PJ must be made
in the first responsive pleading, in answer or separate motion
motion for lack of SMJ can be raised
at any time, even on appeal
domicile is based on
the person’s permanent home in which he intends to stay
a new domicile may be established by
physical presence in the new place and an intention to remain there permanently or for an indefinite period
corp domicile
everywhere incorporated, one state where PPB
a case can only be remanded to state court if
there was state litigation, so not if it was initially filed in fedearl court
a defendant must seek removal within
30 days after receipt of a pleading, motion, or order showing that the case has become removable
right of recovery is/is not limited in federal court by prayer for relief in case
is not
28 USC Section 1441(b) prohibits removal of diversity cases in which
any defendant is a citizen of the forum state
venue in civil actions in federal courts is proper in
1) district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the state,
2) judicial district in which a substantial part of the events occurred,
3) if neither, where any defendant is subject to PJ in the action
forum non conveniens
transfer may be had, even though venue is proper, if the parties or witnesses would be greatly inconvenienced by the trial in the current venue
when deciding whether to transfer venue under forum non conveniens
1) P’s choice of venue
2) convenience of parties and witnesses,
3) interests of justice (familiarity with law, pendency of related actino)
original court has discretion to transfer action to a court in which
the action might have been brought in conformity with SMJ, PJ and proper venue, or for FNC basis anywhere the parties may consent to
transfer is not appropriate when it would likely only serve to
shift the balance of convenience from the plaintiff to the defendant
interlocutory orders that are appealable as of right
injunctions, patent infringement rulings, appointment of receivers
collateral order rule
if a claim is or issue is separable from and collateral to the main suit and is a claim too important to require deferring appellate review, it may be classified as a judgment in a separaete proceeding and be appealable
interlocutory appeals act
requires 1) trial court to certify a question of law as to which there is substantial grounf for a difference of opinion arose in the case and immdeiate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, 2) the court of appeals to allow the appeal
if there is no federal law on point, the federal judge must
apply state law if the issue is substantive
five issues that are substantive
elements of a claim or defense, SOL, rules for tolling SOL’s, conflict or choice of law rules, and standard for whether to grant a new trial because of damages determination