V4 Flashcards

1
Q

Democracy: Definition

A

Samuels: a political system in which the rulers are accountable to the ruled

Lincoln: Government of the people, by the people, and for the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Democracy: Three Principles

A

Accountability

Participation

Contestation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Democracy: Requirements

A

Elected government

Civil liberties

Fair and frequent elections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Procedural v Substantive Definitions of Democracy

A

Procedural:does the political process follow democratic principles?

Substantive: does the outcome of the political process satisfy norms such as equality, fairness and inclusion?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Democracy: Schumpeter

A

Minimalist procedural definition(Schumpeter): based on elections
– Ex ante uncertainty
– Ex post Irreversibility
– Repeatability (Cheibub, Gandhi, Vreeland 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Democracy Dahl

A

Dimensions:
Public contestation
inclusiveness

with

competitive oligarchies
polyarchies (ideal)
closed hegemonies
inclusive hegemonies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Milestones in Developments of Democracy

A

Dahl:

Incorporation: right to vote granted to large parts of the citizenry

Representation: right to form parties – led to a shift to PR systems in
many countries

Organized opposition: right to “throw the rascals out” – vote against the government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Vanhanen’s Polyarchy Dataset

A
  • Close to Dahl’s two‐dimensional concept
  • Contestation C:100–(vote share of largest party)
  • Participation P: voters’ percentage of total population
  • Final index D = (C*P)/100
  • Replicability and Reliability: high
  • Validity: problematic
    – Two‐party systems receive low C scores
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Polity IV Project

A
  • Core dimensions of the index – Competitiveness of political participation

– Regulation of political participation

– Competitiveness of executive recruitment

– Openness of executive recruitment

– Constraints on the chief executive
* Additive scale
– 10 autocracy to +10 democracy

  • Qualitative scores for the sub‐components: high validity * Replicability and reliability problematic * Scores suggest equidistance between categories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Freedom House Index

A
  • 192 countries and 18 territories, since 1972
  • Indicator measures “global freedom”, not necessarily democracy
  • Two dimensions (not Dahl’s!):
    – Political rights
    – Civil liberties
  • Assessment based on actual situation
  • Scores from 0 (bad) to 4 (good) on 10 political rights indicators and 15 civil liberties indicators
  • Focus on freedom and civil rights, not participation and contestation: validity?
  • Limited replicability: coding decisions not transparent
  • Overlapsbetweendimensions
  • Change in definitions/codings over time, limited comparability with earlier versions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Varieties of Democracy (V‐Dem)

A
  • 250+ states and territories, since 1900 [1789]
  • 470 unique democracy indicators
  • over 3,700 country experts
  • Separate indices of five varieties of democracy: electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative, and egalitarian.
  • Aggregation via IRT model
  • Transparency about coding decisions and aggregation methods: high replicability
  • Democracy measures consist of many subcomponents: validity
  • Scores can change over time: reliability?
  • Some indicators are hard to measure: validity?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Madison’s Dilemma

A
  • Balance between limited and effective government
  • Four principles of constitutional design:
    – Unitary vs federal system
    – Separation or fusion of powers
    – Judicial review vs. parliamentary supremacy
    – Majoritarian or proportional electoral system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Vertical Division of Power

A
  • Unitary state: Central government has exclusive and final authority over entire territory
    – Examples: France, Israel
  • Federal state: Multiple governments have overlapping
    authority over certain pieces of territory
    – Examples: US, Germany, India
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why Federalism?

A
  • Large territories * Manage ethnic/religious diversity
  • Potential problems:
    – Less effective
    – Need to divide up responsibilities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Presidential Systems

A
  • Executive and legislative branches enjoy – Separation of origin: each branch directly elected by the voters

– Separation of survival: both serve fixed terms in office

  • President appoints a cabinet (“secretaries” or “ministers”)
  • Neither can dismiss the other * Example: US, Latin America
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Parliamentary Systems

A
  • Voters elect members of legislature
  • Legislators elect chief executive (“prime minister”) & PM appoints cabinet
  • Legislature can fire PM (no‐confidence vote), PM can call early elections (no fixed terms)

No separation of origin, no separation of survival

Parliament makes and breaks government * Examples: Most West‐European countries

17
Q

Semi‐presidential Systems

A
  • Have both a president and a PM
  • Separation of origin: president and legislature elected separately

– Parliament elects PM, approved by the president

– PM appoints cabinet

  • Fixed term for the president, but not for the PM and the legislature

Dual executive: shared power between president and PM

  • Example:WeimarRepublic,France,Portugal,Russia
18
Q

Addressing Madison’s Dilemma

A
  • Presidential system
    – Effectiveness: concentration of executive power – Limitation: executive and legislative branches separated
  • Parliamentary system
    – Effectiveness: lack of separation
    – Limitation: in practice, power often is dispersed within the legislature (coalitions)
  • Semi‐presidentialsystem
    – Effectiveness: unilateral powers of the president – Limitation: dual executive, president and PM from different parties
19
Q

Judicial Review vs. Parliamentary Supremacy

A
  • Judicial review
    – High court can check whether laws are constitutional (and possibly
    invalidate them)
  • Limitation of government
    – Elections may not be sufficient
    – Temporary majority can hijack political process
  • Employed in 71% of democracies worldwide
20
Q
A