V. CO-OWNERSHIP AND MARITAL INTERESTS (343-48, 361-410) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

3 forms of concurrent interest

A
  1. tenancy in common - 2+ w/o right of survivorship, when 1 dies their interest passes to heirs/devisees
  2. joint tenancy - 2+ w/ right of survivorship, CL requires 4 unities (time, title, interest, possession)
  3. tenancy by entirety - exists only between hubby and wife, right of survivorship that can’t be severed w/o consent of both spouses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

tenancy in common

A

each owner has separate undivided interest in the whole, no right of survivorship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

main diff btwn tenancy in common and joint tenancy?

A

joint tenancy has right of survivorship, tenant in common does not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

are equal shares necessary for tenant in common? can they include diff types of estates?

A

no, it is presumed they are equal but evidence that unequal shares were intended can overcome this; diff types of estates are also okay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

alienability of a tenancy in common

A

tenant in common can sell, give, devise, or otherwise dispose of her undivided share in the same manner as if she were the sole owner of the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

partition

A

any tenant in a tenancy in common or joint tenancy can bring a suit in partition; it’s an equitable proceeding where ct physically divides or sells the common property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when a conveyance is made to 2+ who aren’t hubby & wife, what type of concurrent ownership are they presumed to have?

A

tenancy in common (can be overcome by evidence that joint tenancy was intended)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

joint tenancy

A

undivided share of property with right of survivorship (so tenant who lives the longest takes the property by herself); 4 unities requirement of time, title, interest, possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what type of concurrent ownership do heirs take when they inherit property by intestate succession?

A

tenants in common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

4 unities requirement of join tenancy

A
  1. unity of time - interest must vest at the same time
  2. unity of title - must acquire by same deed/will or by a joint adverse possession
  3. unity of interest - equal in an estate of one duration (identical interests), share of each joint tenant must be equal
  4. unity of possession - each joint tenant has right to possession of the whole
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

per my et per tout

A

by the share or moiety and by the whole (joint tenants are regarded as composing one entity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In most states, how would conveyance by Hubby “to H and W as joint tenants” be viewed? In CL?

A

Most states - joint tenants bc H is conveying to a different entity (H and W) of which H is only a part

In CL - tenants in common; not joint tenancy bc it’s just a conveyance of a one-half interest by H to W so unities of time and title are lacking. Alternatively, H can use a strawperson: H conveys to straw person and then strawperson conveys “to H and W as joint tenants”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

main difference between tenancy in entirety and joint tenancy?

A

in tenancy in entirety neither tenant acting alone can do anything to destroy the right of survivorship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

tenancy in entirety

A

only btwn hubby and wife, 4 unities, right of survivorship, severance by one tenant is impossible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

per tout et non per my

A

in tenancy in entirety hubby and wife take as one person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does a co-tenant in possession have to pay rent?

A

Not unless co-tenant in possession ousted other(s), agreed to pay, or co-tenant in possession stands in a fiduciary relationship to other(s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

ouster

A

co-tenant that deprives another co-tenant of right of possession

18
Q

partition in kind

A

court may order physical partition of property into separate tracts if that is feasible; once the land is physically partitioned, each part owns her tract alone in fee simple

19
Q

owelty

A

used in partition in kind when separate tracts are not of equal value, ct will require one tenant to pay $ to other tenant to equalize values

20
Q

partition by sale

A

if physical partition is not feasible or in best interests of the parties, court will order the property sold and sale proceeds divided equally among co-tenants; however, division of proceeds may be adjusted on account of taxes, interest, repairs, and improvements.

21
Q

Statute of Anne

A

Anne wants her proportionate share.

cotenant in possession need not account (pay rent) to covenant out of possession; covenant out of possession can only demand occupation (jointly); however, covenant in possession is accountable to any covenants of any rents received (and if he receives rent, he has given up right to occupy that land)

22
Q

In a jxn following majority rule, if one co-tenant ousts another co-tenant, what must she pay the ousted co-tenant?

A

she must pay the ousted co-tenant his share of the reasonable rental value of the property

23
Q

How to establish adverse possession in cotenancy?

A

To establish adverse possession, co-tenant must give other co-tenants clear and unequivocal notice of repudiation of the common title. Very hard to trigger adverse possession in cotenancy because one cotenant always acts permissibly (doesn’t satisfy hostility requirement); also cannot have adverse possession where cotenant is kin, because the courts often treat the cotenant as a fiduciary.

24
Q

partition in kind

A

court may order physical partition of property into separate tracts if that is feasible; once the land is physically partitioned, each part owns her tract alone in fee simple

25
Q

Should cts consider sentimental value given to one area of the property when granting partition in kind?

A

Courts must behave neutrally and equally; should NOT consider the sentimental value given to one area of the property (although you see courts doing this all the time, as in Delfino v. Vealencis)

26
Q

No Fault Divorce laws

A

Before 1970, divorce was only granted if one party committed a marital “fault” such as extreme cruelty or adultery. No fault divorce laws allowed divorce absent marital misconduct.

27
Q

Did cts prefer partition in kind or partition by sale? Modern preference?

A

common law’s preference for partition in kind stems from simplicity of dividing farmland to reflect individuals’ interest; as soon as interests are in more urban areas, equitable division becomes difficult, and partition by sale makes more sense

28
Q

accounting

A

equitable proceeding, an action for accounting is limited to assets the person is accounting for (i.e. rents recieved)

29
Q

right to contribution

A

an action for contribution is not limited, cotenant can go after any of the cotenants’ assets to satisfy it

30
Q

Delfino v. Vealencis

A

DelVe into trash (garbage removal business case)

Court held partition in kind was feasible and in the interests of all parties, since there would be great hardship posed on defendant in forcing her to sell her land and business

Court holds partition in sale should only be granted in extraordinary circumstances because it forces a person to sell his home/land; it should only be granted where physical attributes of land make partition impracticable or inequitable, or interests of owners would better be promoted by partition by sale.

31
Q

Swartzbaugh v. Sampson

A

Sam loves Pacquiao

plaintiff and defendant Swartzbaugh are husband and wife who hold land as joint tenants; defendant leased land to Sampson to build boxing pavilion, but plaintiff was opposed to this action; question is whether defendant can lease land held in joint tenancy without plaintiff’s consent

One cotenant may give another the right to occupy and use the property of co-tenancy as fully as that cotenant may have used or occupied it; defendant was fully capable of leasing his rights to the land to Sampson; this does not prejudicially affect plaintiff’s rights Lease gives defendant the same right to the property as defendant Swartzbaugh had; lease does not sever joint tenancy (joint tenancy severed only if cotenant conveys whole interest to a third party)

32
Q

Marital Property

A

Defined in some states to include all property acquired during marriage by any means; others only include property acquired from earnings of either spouse during marriage.

33
Q

Is a professional degree marital property?

A

not marital property (In re Marriage of Graham); marital property (O’Brien v. O’Brien)

34
Q

Elkus v. Elkus

A

elks love opera

Holding: defendant is entitled to amount of increased value stemming from his contribution to plaintiff’s career; this was product of marital partnership, and therefore marital property subject to equitable division

35
Q

In re Marriage of Graham

A

MBA’s eat Graham crackers

Holding: degree is not property; it does not have exchange value or any transferable value on open market; it is personal to the holder, terminates on death of holder and is not inheritable; it cannot be assigned, sold, transferred, conveyed, or pledged; it may not be acquired by mere expenditure of money

36
Q

Dower

A

at CL, wife has dower in all freehold land of which husband is seised during marriage and which is inheritable by issue born of the marriage

Dower is a life estate in one-third of each parcel of a dead husband’s freehold land that goes to Wife upon H’s death. The rest goes to heirs and assignees.

37
Q

Curtesy

A

husband had curtsey only if issue were born of the marriage; he received life estate in all of his wife’s land (not merely 1/3 of them)

38
Q

Elective share

A

surviving spouse gets elective share in decedent’s property owned at death; share is usually one-half or one-third; it is in both real and personal property; this has replaced common law dower and curtesy in most states (except Georgia)

option: Surviving spouse can renounce the will and elect to take a statutory share.

39
Q

Just as co-tenants generally do not have a duty to repair, co-tenants do not have a duty to _____

A

improve

40
Q

Co-tenant that improves should get the _______ by the improvements.

A

value added

Thus, if the improvements add no value, the improver is not reimbursed (improver bears the risk)