Util Flashcards
Bentham general
non theist
hedonistic
barrister, wanted new justice, principle of utility
HC egs
intensity
fecundity
duration
act util
individualistic approach
apply HC
rules are not valuable
modern: Sedgwick
case studies
Bernard williams - Indians
richard norman - kids and bike
mill summary
Bentham ‘remained a child’
happiness is not physical
about happiness of society
higher/lower pleasures
quality of pleasure
socrates vs. pig
mill - weak rule
rules are guidance, help majority
not necessary, can be subjective
for happiness of society
Alasdair macintyre
similarities
happiness and pleasure are inbuilt
teleological
no religion
differences
quality vs. quantity
H/L pleasures vs. HC
society, human rights vs. individual, no HR
pref util
singer
what is rationally preferable
e.g. altruism
speciesism
critics of bentham
- hume, NF
- nozick, pleasure = happiness?
- Macintyre, neglect minority in need e.g. woman gang raped
- robert Murrary, “If we take away conscience, as Bentham does, there is no such thing as moral or immoral action.
- c l wayper, in his study of the atomic individual, he has left out both society and history”.
- Hodgson, act util is not practical
- pojman, Utilitarianism can require us to violate our most deeply held principles
supporters of bentham
Bernard williams: accessible etc.
sidgwick, intuitively go for what will cause the most pleasure
hare, if I say that I ought to behave in a certain way toward others, it follows that, if the situation were exactly reversed, they ought to behave in the same way toward me
supporters of mill
palmer, happiness has instrumental value. (supporting mill on happiness is not something physical)
Bentham human rights
nonsense on stilts
natural rights lack ontological basis
rights accorded in the French declaration (1789) led to revolution
mill on human rights
if you increase personal happiness, you will increase your own
moral duty and rights at centre of argument. when one fails to fulfil moral duty, ne causes harm to another
justice is key part of morality
for the safeguard of the minority interest, he supported the system of Proportional Representation. He said that the majority had no right to suppress the feeling of the minority.