using psychophysics in clinic: assessment of vision in infants and children Flashcards
what is the wikipedia definition of psychophysics
“psychophysics quantitatively investigates the relationship between physical stimuli and the sensations and perceptions they affect”
you are getting a number in the end that describes the extent to which they’re able to see this stimulus or the way they can see this stimulus
how is visual acuity a psychophysical test
the set of letters on a letter chart is the visual stimulus, when asking what is the lowest line of letters they can read, when the patient tells us, they are telling us about their perception, this gives a quantitative output i.e. va is a number
when is using a psychophysical test such as visual acuity from a letter chart not possible and why
for people who cannot respond for some reason e.g. children, you need to find out their perception to a stimulus without asking them what they can see as they can’t tell us, so need a different method
name 2 main types of psychophysical tests used on children who cannot respond to visual acuity charts, and name 2 other methods which are not psychophysical tests
- preferential looking (PL)
- forced-choice preferential looking (FPL) = slight adaptation of preferential looking
other methods:
- OKN
- VEP
how is a preferential looking test carried out
- pattern on one part of a display which is held up infront of an infant
- remainder or display has the same average luminance
- observe, whether the infant reliably looks towards the pattern
- or point toward it, or say where it is (which in this case is not PF)
what will the card look like to the baby, in preferential looking test if a baby has not acuity and why
the whole card will appear to look grey as they can’t discriminate the pattern of one side
how is bias avoided when carrying out a preferential looking test on a child
the practitioner only holds the cards and does not know which side the pattern is on, they just observe the patient’s eyes/behaviour
what type of stimulus is displayed on cardiff cards and which type of children are they used on in a preferential looking test
familiar objects such as a house or a duck drawn on a grey background
so used on a child who is old enough to recognise these objects
how are the objects drawn on cardiff cards when assessing acuity in a preferential looking test and how will it appear if a child is unable to resolve the object
objects are drawn in white with a black border,
thickness of the white line denotes acuity level, if unable to resolve the black and white lines then the child will see no picture and the whole card will appear uniformly grey.
the black and white contrast will always be the same, as you are not assessing contrast sensitivity here
how are the objects drawn on cardiff cards when assessing contrast sensitivity in a preferential looking test
objects are drawn in light grey with a darker grey border
how do cardiff cards avoid discrimination during a preferential looking test
the whole card is grey with the same luminance/average brightness over the whole card = same mean luminance as the picture
swell as assessing a child’s resolution acuity and contrast sensitivity, what else can the pictures on a cardiff card assess
higher level acuity, such as asking the child to identify the picture = recognition acuity
how does the target appear on a keeler/teller card
sine wave grating on one half and uniform grey on the other half
how do keeler cards avoid the effect of an ‘edge artifact’ caused by gratings abruptly stopping at their border with the grey background
theres a white circle around the same region on both halves
(this doesn’t say anything about acuity, but the baby prefers the pattern when the artifact is there, if the baby can’t perceive the pattern but can perceive the artifact, then the artifact will be on both sides)
list the method of how you will test a child with cardiff and keeler cards
- cards presented at about 40cm
- higher spatial frequency or lower contrast lines until no reliably correct response/baby shows no preference
- response could be verbal, pointing or preferential looking
- if involves identification (cardiff cards), measures recognition acuity (a different type of acuity)
- otherwise involves resolution acuity
- is the response correct?
- its the practitioner’s judgement
- practitioner should be unaware of the true position of the pattern
- the position is shuffled to avoid bias
why are the cards presented at 40cm from the child when using the cardiff and keeler cards
as babies can accommodate more accurately at 40cm, so they can see better
what do cardiff cards not have, in order to avoid distractions
they dont have pinholes in the middle
what is a problem with showing a card with higher spatial frequency or lower contrast lines until no reliably correct response, with cardiff and keeler cards
babies lose motivation quickly