US Supreme Court cases Flashcards

1
Q

2023 Students for Fair Admissions vs Harvard

A

Race-based affirmative action programs in civilian college admissions processes violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2013 United States vs Windsor

A

landmark case concerning same-sex marriage, court held that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which denied federal recognition of same-sex marriages, was a violation of the Due Process Clause of the 5th Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2022 Dobbs vs Jackson

A

Held that the constitution does not confer a right to abortion, overturned the 1973 Roe vs Wade ruling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

2015 Obergefell vs Hodges

A

The Fourteenth Amendment requires a state to licence a marriage between two people of the same sex with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities and to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2011 Snyder vs Phelps

A

Upheld the right to freedom of speech even if what is being said is deemed as being outrageous or offensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

2006 Hamdan vs Rumsfeld

A

U.S. citizen was entitled to an opportunity to contest the factual basis for his detention before a neutral decision-maker as a matter of due process, even if they were being trialled as an enemy force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

2018 Carpenter vs United States

A

Government acquisition of cell-site records is a Fourth Amendment search, and, thus, generally requires a warrant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2022 New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc vs Bruen

A

The Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defence in public, outside the home; firearms regulations challenged on constitutional grounds must be evaluated against the “history and tradition” of such laws in the U.S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2010 Bond vs United States

A

Both individuals and states can bring a Tenth Amendment Challenge to federal law.
Congress did not have the authority to establish enforcement of overly broad federal laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

1989 Texas vs Johnson

A

landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

1803 Marbury vs Madison

A

established the precedent of judicial review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

2020 Bostock vs Clayton County

A

United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

2010 Citizens United vs FEC

A

a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

2012 Arizona vs United States

A

State vs federal rights
A case in which the Court found that Arizona’s state immigration provisions conflicted in part with federal immigration laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2008 DC vs Heller

A

Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defence in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

2000 Bush vs Gore

A

Despite violating the Fourteenth Amendment by using disparate vote-counting procedures in different counties, Florida did not need to complete a recount in the 2000 presidential election because it could not be accomplished in a constitutionally valid way within the time limit set by federal law for resolving these controversies.

17
Q

2018 Trump vs Hawaii

A

involving Presidential Proclamation 9645 signed by President Donald Trump, which restricted travel into the United States by people from several nations, or by refugees without valid travel documents, upheld it

18
Q

2012 National Federation of Independent Business vs Sebelius

A

Supreme Court case ruled that it was constitutional for Congress to enact most of the elements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare. This included the requirement for Americans to have health insurance by 2014.