US Supreme Court Flashcards

1
Q

Marbury vs. Madison

A

In a 4-0 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that although it was illegal for Madison to withhold the delivery of the appointments, forcing Madison to deliver the appointments was beyond the power of the U.S. Supreme Court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

McCulloch vs. Maryland

A

In a unanimous decision, the Court held that Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers. Pursuant to the Necessary and Proper Clause (Art.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gibbons vs. Ogden

A

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gibbons. Congress had the right to regulate interstate commerce. The sole decided source of Congress’s power to promulgate the law at issue was the Commerce Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dred Scott vs. Sanford

A

Sandford, was a decade-long fight for freedom by a Black enslaved man named Dred Scott. The case persisted through several courts and ultimately reached the U.S. Supreme Court, whose decision incensed abolitionists, gave momentum to the anti-slavery movement and served as a stepping stone to the Civil War.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Engel vs. Vitale

A

In a 6–1 decision, the Supreme Court held that reciting government-written prayers in public schools was unconstitutional, violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Tinker vs. Des Monines (Links to an external site.)

A

In 1969 the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students. The high court agreed that students’ free rights should be protected and said, “Students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Wallace vs. Jaffree

A

Jaffree, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 4, 1985, ruled (6–3) that an Alabama statute that authorized a one-minute period of silence in all public schools “for meditation or voluntary prayer” violated the First Amendment’s establishment clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Texas vs. Johnson

A

Johnson, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) on June 21, 1989, that the burning of the U.S. flag is a protected form of speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Plessy vs. Ferguson

A

Ferguson, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on May 18, 1896, by a seven-to-one majority (one justice did not participate), advanced the controversial “separate but equal” doctrine for assessing the constitutionality of racial segregation laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Brown vs. Board of Education

A

In a major civil rights victory, the U.S. Supreme Court hands down an unanimous decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, ruling that racial segregation in public educational facilities is unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mapp vs. Ohio

A

Supreme Court issued a 6–3 decision in favor of Mapp that overturned her conviction and held that the exclusionary rule applies to American states as well as the federal government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Heart of Atlanta Hotel vs. US

A

The Commerce Clause extends the anti-discrimination provisions in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to hotels that host travelers from outside the state. In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Clark, the Court held the government could enjoin the motel from discriminating on the basis of race under the Commerce Clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Furman vs. Georgia

A

Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), was a criminal case in which the United States Supreme Court invalidated all death penalty schemes in the United States in a 5–4 decision, with each member of the majority writing a separate opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Roe vs. Wade

A

On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision in favor of “Jane Roe” (Norma McCorvey) holding that women in the United States had a fundamental right to choose whether to have abortions without excessive government restriction and striking down Texas’s abortion ban as unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Gregg vs. Georgia

A

In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that a punishment of death did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments under all circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Gideon vs. Wainright

A

In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Gideon, guaranteeing the right to legal counsel for criminal defendants in federal and state courts. Following the decision, Gideon was given another trial with an appointed lawyer and was acquitted of the charges.

17
Q

Miranda vs. Arizona

A

5–4 decision for Miranda
Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the opinion of the 5-4 majority, concluding that defendant’s interrogation violated the Fifth Amendment.

18
Q

Schenck vs. US

A

Image result for Schenck vs. US who won
The U.S. Supreme Court reviewed Schenck’s conviction on appeal. The Supreme Court, in a pioneering opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, upheld Schenck’s conviction and ruled that the Espionage Act did not violate the First Amendment.

19
Q

Korematsu vs. US

A

United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, on December 18, 1944, upheld (6–3) the conviction of Fred Korematsu—a son of Japanese immigrants who was born in Oakland, California—for having violated an exclusion order requiring him to submit to forced relocation during World War II.

20
Q

Miller vs. California

A

In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that obscene materials did not enjoy First Amendment protection. The Court modified the test for obscenity established in Roth v. United States and Memoirs v.

21
Q

New Jersey vs. T.L.O.

A

The Supreme Court justices all agreed on some parts of the decision, but three (Justices Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens) dissented in part. The Court unanimously held that students have a Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure while in school.

22
Q

Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

A

In a 5-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the principal’s actions did not violate the students’ free speech rights.