US Democracy And Participation Flashcards
What is a primary?
It is the first stage of voting where candidates from the same party compete in a public vote.
Candidates compete in each stage to win delegates.
What is the difference between an open primary and closed primary?
Open primaries allow any voter to participate in either party’s primary. (Texas)
Closed primaries only allow registered supporters of a party to vote at their primary. (Florida)
What’s a caucus?
Public meetings/debates before voting by raising hands or standing.
Lower turnout rate.
Only typically attended by more political people.
Advantages of primaries/caucuses?
- voter choice and democracy
- electability/ proven candidates - tests ability to overcome issues and raise funds
-raise key issues - competition tests different policies/political education
- acts as media coverage for candidates
Disadvantages of primaries/caucuses?
- timing - early states voting influence late states
- internal divides in parties - reduce popularity of winning candidates/ negative campaigning within party.
- specific procedures - different rules for different states
What are invisible primaries?
Invisible primaries happen the period before actual primaries where candidates attempt to gather support and funds; many drop out.
National party conventions
- select the presidential/ vice presidential candidates for the party.
- delegates debate and vote to determine the policy of the party.
2016 convention endorsement examples
Hillary Clinton was endorsed by Obama and Bill Clinton along with Katy Perry and Lady Gaga.
The electoral college
Founding fathers feared popular sovereignty so they created the electoral college to act as a filter on public opinion.
The number of votes each state gets is not proportional to representation.
Leads to small states not only being protected by overrepresented.
Electoral college votes for California and Wyoming
California: population 39million, 55 ECV
Wyoming: population 600,000, 3 ECV
Advantages of the electoral college
- respects the tradition of federalism
- by basing voting in individual states, candidates are required to win the support of state emphasising their importance.
- smaller states are deliberately overrepresented so not to be intimidates by larger states.
- winner takes all system helps to ensure one candidate receives a majority of the ECV
- gives the elected president greater legitimacy
Disadvantages of the ECV
- possible for one candidate to get more votes but for the other to win due to the ECV
E.g. Al Gore receives half a million more votes than bush
Clinton received 3 million more votes than trump.
- restricts the fundamental democratic principle of political equality as swing states as overrepresented.
- most states are usually safe Republican or Democrat so the marginal ones are the most decisive. Candidates concentrate time and money on these states. Gives swing states disproportionate influence in selecting the president and encourages candidates to offer great political benefits to those states . Obama spent significantly more money on Pennsylvania than Illinois even though they have the same number of electors.
Party system
- the US is seen as a two party system
- spoiler effect: when a third party candidate helps prevent one of the main party candidates from winning.
Nader got 97,000 votes which would have been likely to go to Gore rather than Bush in 2000
Incumbency
- The power of incumbent is the name given to the advantage awarded to the those seeking reelection to an office they already hold.
Lame duck - incumbent who is not running for re-election.
Barack Obama was president in 2008 and became president again in 2012.
Donald Trump was president in 2016 but lost to Joe Biden in 2020.
Incumbency advantages:
- presidents can bring benefits to key groups and swing states or make popular policy shifts before an election.
E.g. Obama rewarded key voting blocs (Hispanics - executive orders in immigration/ appointment of the first Hispanic SC judge) - presidents can attracts publicity and sell their message
- if their first term has gone well it gives them a good reputation.
- incumbent has an established campaign team with a proven track record.
- incumbents also typically outspend their opponents.
- incumbents do not usually face a primary challenge
Incumbency disadvantages
- presidents can recieve praise but also blame when things go wrong. E.g. failing economy under Bush
- others can exploit the media - TV debates allows challengers to impress on voters their advantages over a president.
E.g. carter put Reagan in his place - asked audience if they were any better off than they were 4 years ago. - money doesn’t guarantee success - Clinton outspent Trump in 2016/
- primaries may give a challenger the opportunity to show political strength and to take media attention away from the incumbent president.
Campaign finance
Refers to the funding of election campaigns
-Candidates raise large amounts of money in order to run an effective campaign, with most of this money being spent on advertising
-Without high levels of spending it is extremely difficult for a candidate to compete-McCutcheon v FEC (2014)
– Supreme Court struck down limits on individual campaign contributions
-There have been major concerns over the role of money in US elections:
Excessive influence of major donors
Secrecy surrounding who is donating and receiving cash
Inequality of expenditure between candidates or parties
Campaign finance regulations:
Federal Election Campaign Act (1974):
- Introduced to regulate money in elections oPlaces legal limits on campaign contributions
– private individual can only donate $2,700 and a group can only donate $5,000 to an individual candidate
- Creates a maximum expenditure limit for each candidate in the election oRequires them to disclose sources of campaign contributions and campaign expenditure
- Created federal funding of presidential/primary elections on a matching funding basis (for every dollar a candidate raises, they are given a dollar by the government
- Created PACs – had to be created by any group wanting to donate money to a campaign and had to register to the Federal Election Commission who would oversee finance rules
Soft money
- Money donated or spent that could not be regulated under the law
- Loopholes allowed for continued donations/spending without regulations
Eg. a business or interest group could spend money on campaign advertising for or against a candidate without directly donating money to a campaign
End of federal funding:
- candidates become increasingly effective in raising money
2000 – Bush raised more than the campaign limit ($120 million) without using federal funding so he wasn’t restricted by campaign expenditure limits – made it harder for Al Gore (who took matching funds to compete
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (2002)
Banned soft money donations
-Said that issue adverts could not be funded directly by corporations or unions
-Said adverts mentioning a candidate’s name could not be shown within 60 days of anelection, unless approved by one of the candidates, with money spent being covered by spending regulations
Super PACs
Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (2010) ruling struck down key parts of the BCRA – infringed 1st amendment rights
-Gave rise to new organisations set up to influence electoral outcomes without directly working with / donating to a candidate
-Raise funds and spend them mainly on advertising without any campaign finance restrictions (eg. Trump’s Rebuilding America Now)
-2016 Super PACs raised over $1.5 bn during that year’s elections
-Criticised for inequality of funding, negative campaigning and excessive influence of major donors.
Social and moral issues:
- Democrats – described as progressives / Republicans – more conservative approach
-Modern Democrats tend to support greater protection on individual liberty and the prevention of discrimination – Republicans have often resisted such changes
-Republicans tend to promote traditional values – arguing for religious choice/states’ rights to be given priority over other rights (eg. abortion, gay rights)
-2016 – Democratic Congressman Maloney proposed an amendment: if a company did not comply with Obama’s executive order banning federal contractors from discriminating against LGBT workers, it would not receive federal funds (43 Republicans voted for but the majority voted against)
Economic policy
National economy:
- Democrats tend to call for greater governmental intervention in the national economy – way of providing social justice
- Democrats generally see capitalism and free-market politics as positive but emphasise the need for protection for those who need it most
- Republicans have a much more restricted view of governmental intervention in the economy – emphasise the idea of personal responsibility and freedom from government control
Taxation:
- Republicans favour tax cuts (for wealthier groups in particular) more than Democrats
-2016 election – Clinton proposed increase tax for the rich and Trump proposed the opposite
Minimum wage:
- Democrats typically support an increase in federal minimum wage (2007 – Democratic majority in the House initiated a rise to $7.25 – most Republicans raised it.