US congress Flashcards
point 1. for congress not fulfilling oversight and examples
- standing committees and select committees are dominated by the makeup of congress
- 115th congress, dominated by republicans
- In 2003 HOS committee, didn’t have hearings on Afghanistan operations, despite media pressure
- modern-day, democrat HOS committee rejected the SC nomination of Bork by Reagan.
analysis suggests if pres party dominates congress, not in the interest for members to criticize executive.
the counterpoint to congress not fulfilling oversight
While committee power is restricted by a unified gov, a divided gov has similar issues
only scrutinize other parties’ actions to gain public points eg democrats overly criticized bush for wars for public points, oversight too partisan
point 2. for congress not fulfilling oversight and examples (SC)
congress check ineffective on SC
congress has power for impeachment trial or +removal from office
However useless due to united gov+partisanship, impossible to overturn SC ruling(only via amendments) modern-day attempts: eg flag burning and prayer at public school decisions have failed.
counterpoint 2. for congress not fulfilling oversight and examples
congress powers, meant to be less than executive power over SC, the ruling shouldn’t be overturned by representatives of short terms vs supreme court years of experience set by founding fathers
congress can fulfill the role 2010 federal judge porteous impeached after corruption.
HOWEVER judges are too politicized and biased, with little oversight or impeachemnt.
point 3. for congress not fulfilling oversight and examples
many checks on executives not implemented (loopholes) eg can ratify treaties but pres can use executive order.
pres signed 800 treaties and 13k exec agreements
congress’s power to declare war infringed as no pred accepting war powers act , congress not given time regarding military action
counterpoint 3 for congress not fulfilling oversight and examples
HOS still passing treaties eg the NEW START treaty with Russia 2010, proposed by Obama
WPA is arguably unconstitutional and undermines role of commander-in-chief
HOWEVER WPA is still effective, not bene ruled by SC
effectiveness of the congress legislative process
point 1: YES (checks and balances)
bill passes through 6 stages, power resides in standing committees, ensures compromise
eg Obamas 2010 healthcare reforms passed by many amendments -> compromise between HOS +HOR
Equal power prevents extreme bills to be blocked -> power always shared.
effectiveness of the congress legislative process
counterpoint 1: NO
process ineficient+low output, 2-4% bills passed (those backed with support from all areas)
conference committees for compromise slow down the process
HOWEVER, effectiveness should be measured by the significance of bills passed not the number
standing committees- policy specialists, would also have mass party support
use of confenrce ecommitees delcines , instead ping pong process sped up legilsation.
effectiveness of the congress legislative process
point 2: produces quality policy
select committees remove the danger of poor bills, ability to amend before sending to floor
HOS+HOR join committee to get re-elected eg both N. Dakota senators part of senate agricultural committee
effectiveness of the congress legislative process
counterpoint 2: poor quality legislation
pork barrelling , gov spending on projects to bring money to local area
2016 congress passed legislation to spend 475 million on a navy ship , not backed by defense sec but support by representatives of major shipbuilding states
HOWEVER 2010, GOP placed a ban on pork barelling, only improve quality now
Effectiveness of the congress legislative process
point 3: protects states+indv rights
senators can amend or filibuster laws that go against state interests eg Thurmond spoke 24 hours against the civil rights act
effectiveness of the congress legislative process
counterpoint3: partisanship
state provisions of rights leas to partisan, members unwilling to compromise -> gridlock
filibusters are increasingly important no, used against opposing party to prevent legislation passing.
eg ted crux spoke against ACA-21 hours
HOWEVER, filibusters 3.5th majority
const gives limited gov, congress can still function just slowly.
“real work of congress occurs in committees not chambers “
point 1: role in legislation
SC+CC (conference) key in dev leg
SC can block bills but all can amend
CC is used for reconciling differences between houses
HRC can decide to hold back HOR bill
“real work of congress occurs in committees not chambers “
counterpoint 1: votes in chambers
CC decreased: 104th congress 37 CC, only 2 in 113th, the role has decreased
HOWEVER, CC role declined but role is to reconcile bills eg Obamacare , still fulfills function when necessary
congress creates legislation but committees improve it.
“real work of congress occurs in committees not chambers “
point 2: role in oversight
executive investigated by committees, sep of powers member of chambers not members of congress, committees main firm of scrutiny
SC permanent, expertise has more oversight, findings weighted
presidential appointments by HOS SC , take a recommendatory vote.