US congress Flashcards
point 1. for congress not fulfilling oversight and examples
- standing committees and select committees are dominated by the makeup of congress
- 115th congress, dominated by republicans
- In 2003 HOS committee, didn’t have hearings on Afghanistan operations, despite media pressure
- modern-day, democrat HOS committee rejected the SC nomination of Bork by Reagan.
analysis suggests if pres party dominates congress, not in the interest for members to criticize executive.
the counterpoint to congress not fulfilling oversight
While committee power is restricted by a unified gov, a divided gov has similar issues
only scrutinize other parties’ actions to gain public points eg democrats overly criticized bush for wars for public points, oversight too partisan
point 2. for congress not fulfilling oversight and examples (SC)
congress check ineffective on SC
congress has power for impeachment trial or +removal from office
However useless due to united gov+partisanship, impossible to overturn SC ruling(only via amendments) modern-day attempts: eg flag burning and prayer at public school decisions have failed.
counterpoint 2. for congress not fulfilling oversight and examples
congress powers, meant to be less than executive power over SC, the ruling shouldn’t be overturned by representatives of short terms vs supreme court years of experience set by founding fathers
congress can fulfill the role 2010 federal judge porteous impeached after corruption.
HOWEVER judges are too politicized and biased, with little oversight or impeachemnt.
point 3. for congress not fulfilling oversight and examples
many checks on executives not implemented (loopholes) eg can ratify treaties but pres can use executive order.
pres signed 800 treaties and 13k exec agreements
congress’s power to declare war infringed as no pred accepting war powers act , congress not given time regarding military action
counterpoint 3 for congress not fulfilling oversight and examples
HOS still passing treaties eg the NEW START treaty with Russia 2010, proposed by Obama
WPA is arguably unconstitutional and undermines role of commander-in-chief
HOWEVER WPA is still effective, not bene ruled by SC
effectiveness of the congress legislative process
point 1: YES (checks and balances)
bill passes through 6 stages, power resides in standing committees, ensures compromise
eg Obamas 2010 healthcare reforms passed by many amendments -> compromise between HOS +HOR
Equal power prevents extreme bills to be blocked -> power always shared.
effectiveness of the congress legislative process
counterpoint 1: NO
process ineficient+low output, 2-4% bills passed (those backed with support from all areas)
conference committees for compromise slow down the process
HOWEVER, effectiveness should be measured by the significance of bills passed not the number
standing committees- policy specialists, would also have mass party support
use of confenrce ecommitees delcines , instead ping pong process sped up legilsation.
effectiveness of the congress legislative process
point 2: produces quality policy
select committees remove the danger of poor bills, ability to amend before sending to floor
HOS+HOR join committee to get re-elected eg both N. Dakota senators part of senate agricultural committee
effectiveness of the congress legislative process
counterpoint 2: poor quality legislation
pork barrelling , gov spending on projects to bring money to local area
2016 congress passed legislation to spend 475 million on a navy ship , not backed by defense sec but support by representatives of major shipbuilding states
HOWEVER 2010, GOP placed a ban on pork barelling, only improve quality now
Effectiveness of the congress legislative process
point 3: protects states+indv rights
senators can amend or filibuster laws that go against state interests eg Thurmond spoke 24 hours against the civil rights act
effectiveness of the congress legislative process
counterpoint3: partisanship
state provisions of rights leas to partisan, members unwilling to compromise -> gridlock
filibusters are increasingly important no, used against opposing party to prevent legislation passing.
eg ted crux spoke against ACA-21 hours
HOWEVER, filibusters 3.5th majority
const gives limited gov, congress can still function just slowly.
“real work of congress occurs in committees not chambers “
point 1: role in legislation
SC+CC (conference) key in dev leg
SC can block bills but all can amend
CC is used for reconciling differences between houses
HRC can decide to hold back HOR bill
“real work of congress occurs in committees not chambers “
counterpoint 1: votes in chambers
CC decreased: 104th congress 37 CC, only 2 in 113th, the role has decreased
HOWEVER, CC role declined but role is to reconcile bills eg Obamacare , still fulfills function when necessary
congress creates legislation but committees improve it.
“real work of congress occurs in committees not chambers “
point 2: role in oversight
executive investigated by committees, sep of powers member of chambers not members of congress, committees main firm of scrutiny
SC permanent, expertise has more oversight, findings weighted
presidential appointments by HOS SC , take a recommendatory vote.
“real work of congress occurs in committees not chambers “
counterpoint 2:
Senate has a final vote on appointments , SC votes-advisory
findings of committees not holding to account, chambers need to impeach+trial
HOWEVER:
Advisory but still provide the basis on how nominations are received by the senate
chambers make decisions without impeaching due to findings of commitee eg nixons watergate , resigned b4 impeached
“real work of congress occurs in committees not chambers “
point 3: role in representation
congress members join SC in the interest of their state (N.DAKOTA-agriculture)
pork-barreling, 2015-475 million on a navy ship to help states with shipbuilding industry
reps invest a lot in committees to carry out functions.
“real work of congress occurs in committees not chambers “
counterpoint 3: congress+ representation
Function fulfilled by debating and voting on leg
rep by sc less important as GOP, 2010, banned pork barrelling (earmarks)
HOWEVER, SC now has a different purpose to improve bills, and +ve an effect on constituents.
parties are significant in congress
counterpoint 2: reduced party control over legislation.
- sep of powers, a few sticks, and carrots to tempt party voting. reps must be persuaded in a bipartisan manner
- congressional caucuses expose divisions between parties and challenge leadership, undermine party control eg freedom caucus led tea party movement
HOWEVER: a rise in party votes, 70% in 2010 to HOS
incraesed partisanhip ansd divide betwene parties means party memebrhsip imp in leg process.
parties are significant in congress
point 1: oversight
oversight effectiveness varies: divided vs united
SC doesn’t function when the pres party dominates, reflect the makeup of congress
eg no Afghanistan hearings 2003 by armed service committee
unified gov , oversight partisan
- criticizing bush for public points
parties are significant in congress
counterpoint 1: party control not sig when exec committed offense.
Serious offenses eg watergate call for bipartisan scrutiny
bipartisanship ensures the party has no say during oversight of undemocratic events by exec
HOWEVER increased partisanship
eg democrat majority critical and republican minority report praised CIA for extreme interrogation
parties are significant in congress
point 2: party impact on legislation.
The ruling party organizes committees
all committees chaired by a majority part member
eg in HRC, the party can determine which bills are discussed on the floor.
parties are significant in congress
point 3: large party control of representation
- congressmen can vote on leg, but increased partisanship will put parties above constituents
- pork barrelling, reps need part support to do so
- parties dominate committees
parties are significant in congress
counterpoint 3: less party influence
- In primary elections, candidates cant be detected so less control over houses
- congressmen dependent on voters put their needs ahead.
HOWEVER, polarisation occurs as centrist members not chosen by voters
eg 2015, no senator between furthest members of each party