US Flashcards

1
Q

The Connecticut Compromise

A

Decision that states would be assigned equal seats in senate and population proportionate seats in the House.
- provides a safeguard for smaller states in constitution so size doesn’t influence political influence.
- key constituent in the bicameral setup of Congress, amplifying the representation and oversight provided by smaller states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

evidence that smaller states are overrepresented in the electoral college

A

Wyoming has 1 EC per 190,000 whereas california has 1 per 680,000 (approximately)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

necessary and proper clause

A

gives congress the power to make laws necessary to carry out enumerated powers.
- constitutional authorisation for many acts of federal government, many of which have threatened the sovereignty of states.
- extends powers to Congress beyond enumerated, serving as a constitutional source for the majority of federal laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

McCulloch vs Maryland 1819

A

established precedent where congress were given broad authority to determine federal powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bill of Rights 1791

A

first 10 amendments of the constitution.
- in the codified constitution, entrenching civil rights and liberties.
- 10th amendment establishes the division of sovereignty between state and federal.
- due to judicial review, justices can be ultimate arbiters if individual rights have been violated.
- rights respected by both political parties, though interpreted differently, such as the 2nd amendment.
- interest groups like ACLU protect civil liberties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Marbury vs Madison 1803

A

birth of judicial review, where SC can invalidate laws that violate the constitution.
- reminder that the power of judicial review is not explicitly in the constitution.
- SC as gatekeepers of the constitution, vital in protecting individual rights and overseeing other branches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Civil War / Reconstruction Amendments (6)

A

13th, 14th and 15th amendments, which abolished slavery, equal protection before the law and barring of race discrimination in the right to vote.
- due to federalism, states have been unequal in their approach to these. e.g. Governor Faubus’s refusal to let black kids into white schools in arkansas until eisenhower intervened.
- congress has served as a safeguard and obstacle to these rights. Civil Rights Act 1964 offered federal protections for these amendments.
- presidents have used unilateral powers to protect these rights, e.g. executive order 11246 establishing the groundwork for affirmative action.
- judicial review allows justices to judge whether these protections are being upheld.
- upholding these amendments ensures fair representation of racial demographics. shelby vs holder decreased participation from minority ethnic groups.
- interest groups such as the ACLU campaign to preserve these civil liberties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

NRA

A

Gun rights interest group.

  • emphasises the security of the 2nd amendment in the constitution.
  • can influence legislation through lobbying, e.g Erica Tegerson. also endorsement, through their superPAC the NRA PVF, they issue ratings to congresspersons, e.g. Joe Manchin dropped from A+ to D in 2018.
  • Interest groups try to influence the SC through amicus briefs, such as DC vs Heller 2008)
  • alternative to representation when big tent parties flop to have an actual focus. promotes a more pluralist landscape in American politics.
  • Electioneering methods such as phone blitzes, which they spend $40 million on in 2008 to attack obama, may emphasise their influence in elections.
  • NRA superPAC spent nearly $20 million on electioneering in 2020. 4.3 million members means they are good at representation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Brown vs Board of Education 1954

A

ruled that segregation laws in schools is unconstitutional, overruling previous ‘separate but equal’ established in plessy vs fergusen 1896. UNANIMOUS DECISION FROM SC.
- unanimity shows that SC can make decisions beyond ideological differenves.
- can show weakness of SC because despite ruling, wasn’t implemented in Arkansas until eisenhower intervened and fully until the civil rights act 1964.
-NAACP played a key role with Thurgood Marshal arguing the case for Brown, highlighting how US interest groups are more likely to engage with all 3 branches to get political change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The AFL-CIO

A

largest federation of unions in the UC w 12 million members. pro labour policies.
- recently they have concentrated their efforts on lobbying Washington and state capitals. In 2022, $5 million was spent on lobbying.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

example of the power of acitvism

A

Phyllis Schlafly’s STOP ERA Campaign was instrument in turning republican sentiment against the amendment.
can also be used for insider vs outsider because many feminist groups used direct action to make change, such as the NOW in 1978.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the ‘Johnson treatment’ and other methods of persuasion

A

Neustadt claimed that the president’s power is chiefly a ‘power to persuade’.
- this highlights the lack of formal power afforded to the P in constitution due to the serperation of powers.
- reinforces the importance of EXOP, as the VP and chief of staff are often used to persuade to push through congressional action. e.g. Office of Legislative Affairs acts as a full time lobbyist for P’s agenda in congress.
- supports the idea of a weak relationship between congresspersons and party leadership (inability to enforce legislative action means that congresspersons can use their vote to receive executive perks).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The Congressional Black Caucus

A

officially non partisan caucus that represents a congressional voting bloc who advocate for interests of AAs. There are 56 members.
- highlights the representation of minority groups in congress which puts the CBC in a better position to affect change.
- example of bipartisan congressional action as historically there have been republican members in this caucus, such as Mia Love in 2019.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The War Powers Resolution 1973

A

federal law to check P’s power. President must notify Congress within 48 hours of military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days without congressional approval.
- key example of checks and balances, but one that exists in principle and not really reality.
- example of the president’s dominance in foreign policy as P’s have rarely been challenged on these grounds due to popularity that surges due to military engagement.
e.g. House calls for withdrawal of troops with Clinton but passes an emergency budget to pay for the US’s role in NATO’s military action.
Obama was able to ignore the 60 day deadline in Libya without significant congressional censure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

US vs Nixon 1974

A

SC unanimously ordered Nixon to deliver subpoenaed materials related to Watergate to a federal district court. this would override his claims to executive privilege.
- highlights strengths and limits that can be imposed upon the presidency from the SC.
- exposes the limits of executive privilage, as it cannot override the needs of the judicial process.
- example of judicial independence as 3 justice were nominated by Nixon voted against him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Regents of California vs Bakke 1978

A

ruled that race could be considered as one of many hollistic factors in admissions, but should not be definite and exclusive.
- set a precedent that was reaffirmed by Grutter vs Bollinger 2003.
- supreme court protecting rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The flag desecration amendment (failed)

A

SC ruled 5/4 that the flag Protection act was unconstitutional.
- a reminder of how hard it is to change the constitution, as this took multiple attempts but still failed.
- shows limits of the president as he wanted these laws to be reconsidered, but he couldn’t change anything without the support of the supreme court.
- example of judicial neutrality as justice Anthony Kennedy highlighted that striking this down was not his personal position.
- example of increased right wing populism within republican party.
- Interest groups such as the ACLU filing amicus curiae briefs for Texas vs Johnson and offering representation in his lower court appeal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

john murtha

A

pennsylvania congressman, who was believed to have steered $2 billion in earmarks from 1992 to 2008.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Robert Byrd

A

A senator who directed $3.3 billion in pork to west virginia between 1991 and 2008.
- effective representation in congress as constitutuents put first
- ineffective representation because congressperson foregoing taxpayer interests to favour their own re-election interests

20
Q

Ross Perot

A

in 1992, Perot won 18.9% of the vote but got 0 EC votes.
- suggests third party candidates can impact politics as Clinton and republican congress pushed for policy advocated by perot to win his voters.
- highlights 2 party system.
- example of how EC favours 2 big parties due to the winner takes all effect.

21
Q

NAFTA 1994

A

an agreement signed by canada, mexico and the US to eliminate most tariffs on traded products between these countries.
- example of bipartisanship, with both dems and reps voting in favour.
- example of an executive agreement, however a simple majority in congress was required, as is in most executive agreements.

22
Q

US vs Lopez 1995

A

SC ruled that the federal gun-free school zones act of 1990 was unconstitutional to do with the commerce clause of the constitution.
- highlights the dynamic between the federal government and the states, as federal doesnt have control over local issues such as gun control on school grounds.
- great example of check as congressional action is effectively restricted by the SC.
- shows SC being ideologically divided, highlighting the importance of swing justices (Kennedy was the deciding vote).

23
Q

Clinton vs New York 1998

A

Line item vote was unconstitutional.

  • highlights attempt to preserve separation of powers.
  • highlights the power of the SC because despite having congressional and presidential approval, it as blocked from being used in governance.
24
Q

Bush vs Gore 2000

A

SC effectively determined the outcome of the 2000 presidential election, on the grounds of the Equal Protection Clause.
- shows how SC deicisons can have a significant political impact. argument that the SC has become a political body as well as a judicial one.
- the winner takes all system of the EC means that the decision was instrumental to the outcome of the 2000 election. if popular vote used, then gore would have won regardless.

25
Q

9/11 2001

A

revised the relationships between branches of government.
- shows how a unified government can lead to reduced oversight, as there were just 37 congressional hearings referred to as ‘oversight’ during the 108th congress.
- shows imperial presidency, as Bush bypassed congressional laws in the name of national security, using signing statements in over 1100 laws.
- SC still did block executive action in this time, e.g. Boumediene vs Bush 2008.
- reflection of the rise of neoconservative elements of the republican party, w Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz playing key roles in promoting an invasion of Iraq.

26
Q

No Child left behind 2002

A

scaled up the federal role in holding schools accountable for student outcomes.
- example fo the federal government imposing itself in domains traditionally managed by the states.
- example of bipartisanship, with the Act easily passing through both the house and the senate.
- this was a key part of Bush’s legislative agenda, which offered a transformative change in american education policy.
- shows the fluid ideological stances that big tent parties adopt, as small government republican responsible for some of the largest federal expenditure in recent decades.

27
Q

Bipartisan campaign reform Act 2002

A

law that looked to regulate campaign finance. made 2 amendments to FECA 1971:
prohibition of soft money donations, and the forbidding of the use of corperate or union money for electioneering.
ELEMENTS OF THIS WERE RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY THE SC.
- key example of bipartisan action as it overcame a senate filibuster with a 60-40 vote.

27
Q

Bipartisan campaign reform Act 2002

A

law that looked to regulate campaign finance. made 2 amendments to FECA 1971:
prohibition of soft money donations, and the forbidding of the use of corperate or union money for electioneering.
ELEMENTS OF THIS WERE RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL BY THE SC.
- key example of bipartisan action as it overcame a senate filibuster with a 60-40 vote.

28
Q

Gonzales vs Raich

A

SC ruled that under the commerce clause, Congress is able to criminalise the production and use of homegrown cannabis even if state law allows its use.
- federal supremacy over state concerns.
- reflective of congressional inaction despite judicial support, as congress have not acted to regulate mary j on the market nationally, leaving states to determine their own laws.
- Scalia departed from his originalist position, where he had previously voted for limits to the commerce clause in US vs Lopez.
- Libertarian groups like Cato Instutite filed briefs in favour of Raich.

29
Q

Hurricane Katrina 2005

A
  • highighted the pitfalls of federalism, in instances where coordination action is required as comitment towards states and local governments being first line responders led to slow decisions.
  • highlights failure in congressional oversight, as disaster preparedness exercises were not effectively carried out due to separation of powers and federalism distinctions.
  • example of how outside events can damage a president’s reputation. Bush’s slow response meant his approval rate dropped to 42%.
30
Q

DC vs Heller 2008

A

SC ruled that District of Columbia’s handgun ban was breaching the 2nd amendment right.
- Scalia’s opinion is an exercise in stricut constructionalism / orignialism.
- influence of the NRA.

31
Q

DREAM Act (failed to pass in 2009 and 20010), DACA and DAPA

A

united states legislative proposal to grand temporary residency to illegal immigrants, giving them various rights. Obama tried to get these through, but it failed to pass.

  • after repealing the expansion of DACA, many local governments set up sanctuary cities which looked to limit federal power to enforce immigration law.
  • example of divided government and gridlock, with republicans filibustering in the senate.
  • executive actions like DACA and DAPA were passed by Obama in response to frustration with the DREAM Act in Congress. (although the SC later found them to be unconstitutional.
  • DAPA ruled uconstiutional in US vs Teaxs, exemplifying the power it has to block presidential action.
  • corporate interests failed in their attempts to convince Congress to pass the DREAM Act.
32
Q

citizens United vs FEC 2010

A

SC ruled that elements of the BCRA are in violation of the 1st amendment, ending the prohibition of independent expenditures and electioneering communications by corporations and unions.
- resulted in an overwhelming increase in election spending for presidential and congressional elections, with the 2020 being the most expensive one to date.
- reinforces influence of supreme court in political matters.
- significant example suggesting the elites can influence election outcomes.
- the creation of superPACs have allowed special interest groups to spend money on election campaigns. e.g. NRA spends money on candidates that align with their vision.

33
Q

Affordable Care Act 2010

A

most significant overhaul of healthcare coverage since 1965, covering the expansion of medicaid availability, effective coverage and more.
- shows flexibility in how states implement law as passed in congress.
- example of gridlock in congress.
- lack of presidential power of persuasion because Obama was forced to make a number of concessions.
- SC will later restrict the work of congress in NFIB vs Sibelius. an example of congressional action protecting racial minorities with the largest gains in insurance rates made amongst hispanic, asian and black communities.
- example of politiacal polarisation, with nearly all the republicans in the house voting against it.

34
Q

REDMAP Initiative

A

project of the republican state laedership committee to increase republican control of congressional seats.
- reinforces the importance of state legislatures in elections, as by winning state alegislative races, republicans were able to redraw congressional districts favouring certain parties.
- an example of partisan gerrymandering, which undeermines the representative function of congress.
- brings into question the validity and use of majority minority districts, as this clusters racial demographics into single seat races.
- due to geryymandering, a disconnect between popular vote and the Hoise outcome is possible. In 2012, h=the republicans won 33 more seats in House, despire gaining 1.4 million fewer votes.

35
Q

NFIB vs Sibelius 2012

A

it is constitutional for congress to enact most elements of the ACA, however the expansion of medicaid was unconstitutional because the spending power belong’s to congress.
- reinfoces the split sovreingty of federalism, as it tightened the federal grip over state funding matters in healthcare.
- reinforces fragility of the president’s legislative agenda as they have little power when challenged by the supreme court.
emphasies the courts position as an imperial judiciary as directly challenged the work of the president.

36
Q

Shelby County vs Holder 2013

A

section of the Voting Rights Act that forced some states to attain preclearance from federal government to change voting restricitions is unconstitutional as this should be a state power.
- key example of federaelism as this reinforced the power of the states in determining their own election laws.
- impact ofthe supreme court in politics, as participation amongst minority groups disproportionately affected. SC can be an obstacle to civil rights protections.
- unequal acess to the vote can be used to question the mandate provided by their outcome.
- connected to the outsider work of the NAACP

37
Q

United States House Select comittee on events surrounding 2012 terrorist attack (2014)

A

2014 house select comite to further investigate into the attack.

  • great example of congressional oversight as they were able to set up a specialist committee to scrutinise the work of other branches of government.
    however also an exmaple of the weaponsiation of scrutiny as this was done by a republican dominated house to bring Clinton’s record in the cabinet under fire.
  • reflective of the influence that the two big parties have on congressional operations, with John Boener speaker rejecting the democrats call for equal representation in the committee.
38
Q

McCutcheon vs FEC 2014

A

Ruled that FECA and BRCA regulations on aggregate limits was unconstitutional. as a result, individuals are able to contribute to as many political candidates as they want, during the 2 year election cycle.

  • SC protection of key individual rights, protecting free speech by relaxing campaign finance laws.
  • welathy donors have more political influence than poorer citizens, becuase of quid pro quo interactions.
39
Q

Obergefell vs hodges 2015

A

gay marriage calm because covered by the Due process clause and equal protection clause in the 14th amendment.

  • SC imposing a constitutional expectation that respect for same sex marriage is adhered to.
  • Respect for marriage Act 2022 served as a congressional backup to this decision, mandating all states to follow this. A bipartisan effort.
  • Loose constructionism example, reinforcing the idea that the SC is ideologically split (5-4 decision)
40
Q

rise of the House Freedom Caucus 2015

A

the most ahrd right faction of the republican party gained significant popularity.
- enforces the importance of committees in congress, with 2 members in the House Rules Committee. emphasises the failures of congress in polarised times, as groups like HFC can effectively frutstrate congressional work by refusing to tow the party line.
- highlights the restrictions congress can impose upon the presidency. in 2023, the HFC served as a mjor obstacle in Biden being able to raise the debt ceiling.
- reinfoces the idea of big tent parties, as it has many factions. this hard right group is the same party as moderates like the republican Gvoernmance Group.
- highlights the fragility of party cohesion and party leadership as HFC were instrumental in frustrating the appointment of kevin McCarthy.

41
Q

failed appointment of Merrick Garland to SC in 2016.

A

Obama nominated him after Scalia died, but republican led senate said no becuase close to end of Obama’s term.
- example of checks and balances, also and example of them becoming politicised as they didn’t want a democratic nomination of a liberal SC.
- congresses power to oversee presidential action and its corruption by leaving this nomination to expire by just refusing to hear it in the judiciary committee.
- refelctive of congresses power over the president.
- refelcts the importance of the makeup of the SC. indicates that it is indeed a political body.
- sound reinforcement of polarisation between political parties.
reflection of the limited impact of interest groups on political agents, as Garland received a ‘well qualified’ rating but wasn’t appointed by senate.

42
Q

2016 election

A

5th occasion where winning presidential candidate failed to win the popular vote.
- because of the 22nd amendment, Obama wasn’t able to run for a third term.
- popular vote vs EC vote.
- electioneering forms a key tole of interest group activity. the SuperPAC raised 192 million to support Clinton.

43
Q

2013 violence against women reauthoriation act

A

rather than following party lines, all female senators voted in favour and worked to garner support from other senators.

44
Q

pros of divided government

A
  • better scrutiny of bills and presidential action. e.g the House blocks Trump’s attempt to secure funds for border through declaration of a national emergency.
    unified gct has led to poor oversight, e.g. bush and the war on terror.
45
Q

cons of divided government

A

division mechanism can be used to frustrate presidential action in the name of partisanship. e.g. Conservative Bork’s nomination to SC blocked by democrat senate in 1987. merrick garland from Obama in 2017.
- pushes power to the executive and judiciary as resolvers of gridlock.