Up to Exam 1 Flashcards
Empirical Issues
observable and factual investigations
Normative Issues
Issues involving judgement and ethics
Postbehavioralism**
Alternative to traditionalism and behavioralism
David Easton
Solely looking at behavior is irresponsible
Postbehavioralists warned, political science would produce data that were scientifically reliable (empirically observed) but irrelevant.
It is not value free because understanding comes from observation, not ethical assessments
David Easton
Politics is always in a world of flux, tension and transitions. Politics is the decision making over the worlds resources.
Postbehavioralist
Behavioralists
Became popular after WWII
Charles Merriam
Examining the actual BEHAVIOR of political officials, not the rules they go by.
The Behavioralists approach to congress would be studying the actual congress men and women, such as how much time they devote to writing law, interacting with lobbyists, raising money for reelection, giving speeches ect.
Case Studies
investigation of a specific phenomenon or entity
allows for an in depth examination of phenomenon
minimizes idols because of isolated data
Survey Research
most popular
questionares or interviews
limitations: types of questions asked, demographics, biases
Experiments **
Test and control groups
participants are randomly assigned to either the treatment or the control group
Quasi-Experiments**
Observation in an uncontrolled environment
participants are not assigned randomly to a treatment or control group in a quasi-experiment.
field experiment
Indirect Quantitive Analysis
data is already compiled by others
Operational Definitions
a definition so precise that it allows for Empirical testing.
Hypothesis
a statement proposing a specific relationship between phenomena
Proposes a relationship that will be tested with empirical observations of the variables
Educated guess on how an independent variable is thought to affect, influence or alter a dependent variable
Independent and Dependent Variables
Independent variable are those that act on or affect something
Dependent variables are what the hypothesis presents as being acted on by the
Age example: age is independent because it effects the level of voting, level of voting is dependent.
Second Amendment: party affiliation is the independent variable because it effects being in favor or out of favor of the second amendment, favorability is dependent variable
Correlation
Relationship in which changes in one variable appear when there are changes in another variable
higher approval rates of the second amendment appears in members of the Republican Party in the US
Causation
Indisputable
we cannot say that being a part of the Republican Party in the US absolutely proves that someone approves of the second amendment
Six Steps of the Scientific Method in Political Science
Formulating Hypothesis-
Operational Definitions- a definition so precise that it allows for Empirical testing.
Identifying independent and dependent variables
Clarifying measurement criteria
Distinguishing the difference between correlation and causation
developing scientific theories - can free us from “idols”
Hawthorne Effect
behavior changes based on environment
Rosenthal Effect
confirmation bias
our actions confirm our own beliefs
Empirical Research Methods
a set of procedures that employ scientific principles and techniques
the dominant approach to research although it is controversial in and out of political science
Questions to a systematic, empirical inquiry
1) How did they arrive at their conclusions?
2) was their method sound?
3) what sorts of evidence support their thesis?
4) should we take their word simply because the authors are well known scholars?
5) Is someone else examined the problem, would they come to the same conclusion?
Interpretation
the effort to see how people understand, use, and react to language, symbols and social institutions and rules
Interpretationists
want to get inside people’s heads, as it were to see how they, not the researcher, comprehend the world.
The Research Process
Curiosity and Necessity Are the primary motives underlying human inquiry
Empirical Analysis
deals with how and what we know
Concerned with developing and using common objective language to describe and explain political reality
Normative Analysis
deals with how we should use our knowledge
Quantitative
statistical comparisons of the characteristics of various objects
Qualitative
researcher’s informed understanding of the same objects or cases
The Operationalization of Theory
operationalization- the conversion or redefinition of our relatively abstract theoretical notions not concrete terms that will allow us actually to measure whatever it is we are after
Moving from the conceptual level of thinking to the operational level of deciding how to solve it.
Research Methods Theories
1) Pick an appropriate research question
2) is a question worthy or research because it fulfills a scientific need or basic need
3) will the answer help us deal with one or another of the problems faced by our society. can it be applied?
Feasibility
stage of the research process at which we prepare to actually go into the real world. We must assure ourselves that whatever method or technique we select can be properly employed under any condition we may face
Generalizability
the ability to generalize or extend our conclusions with some confidence from the observed behavior of a few cases to the behavior of an entire population
sampling procedure
we can decide which few of many cases we can study to come to conclusions that might apply to the entire population of cases
reactivity
Reactivity occurs when the subject of the study (e.g. survey respondent) is affected either by the instruments of the study or the individuals conducting the study in a way that changes whatever is being measured.
Questions concerning the analysis of data
are the two variables statistically related?
how are the variables related?
how likely is it that the relationship of the variables in a small pool of cases also be found in a large population of cases?
Interpretation of the Results
What have we discovered?
What is the substantive importance of our findings?
How do these results square with our expectations?
Empirical Generalization
summarizes relations between individual facts
coincidence v correlation v causality
I walk under a ladder and notice and get all fizzled then I stub my toe
I walk under a ladder, get all fizzled, stub my toe, then ask was I looking at the ladder instead of the ground? I was obsessed about having bad luck?
Did I choose to act differently than I otherwise would have?
I walk under a ladder, get all fizzled, and then I stub my toe. The ladder is the proximate cause but my actions are the direct cause.
Explanatory Knowledge
it can be predictive by offering a systematic, reasoned anticipation of future events.
Explanations give scientific reasons or justifications for why certain outcomes is to be expected
Parsimony
simplicity. the simpler, the better.
the simplest of two explanations
Ockham’s razor
-Exploratory research-
an inadequate knowledge of the facts could fundamentally misdirect theory-building efforts
pre-research research.
designed to establish the facts in a. given case. Helps determine the best research design.
-patterns-**
characteristics and motives
knowing pattens will help with insight but to develop explanation of why someone could do something in order to frame our explanation
-induction-
Evidence to generalization
generalizing from what we have observed to what we have not or cannot observe
induction forms the basis of the scientific theory
theories built through inductions are said to be empirically grounded
All republicans in Iowa are conservative therefore all republicans are conservative
-deduction-
Generalizations to evidence and concrete statements
abstract to the concrete and specific
The Republican Party attracts only conservatives therefore all Republicans in Iowa will be conservative
Assumptions
the conditions under which we expect the tentative explanation we have reached to be supported by evidence
assumptions allow us to explain specific behavior by showing that it follows logically from a set of theoretical assumptions
the reverse of inductive reasoning
survey v case study
survey is when a researcher gathers data through interviews or questionnaires of an entire population or large sample
case study is a study of an individual, group, or specific phenomenon
explanatory and pattern
knowledge as to WHY something happens
patterns are characteristics and motives which could help explain why one would do something
induction v deduction
evidence to generalization v
abstract to specific and concrete
The dominant methodological perspective in political science is
Empiricism
Scientists believe that their findings are based on __________, systematic observation.
Objective
A __________ statement is one that can, in principle, be rejected in the face of contravening empirical evidence.
falsifiable
Normative knowledge that is evaluative, value laden, and concerned with prescribing what ought to be.
True
Cumulative knowledge, with respect to the scientific method, is
Based upon the result of prior studies
The term parsimony refers to
the simplest explanation
A theory is defined as
A body of statements that systemize knowledge and explain phenomena
Political scientists who believe that a proper goal of social science is to critique and improve society (by making it more just and humane) rather than merely understand or explain what is going on embrace
critical theory
Global or broad range theories might include theories of each of the following topics except
A. International relations
B. The rise and fall of civilizations
C. The spread of democracy
D. Role of revolution in political development
role of revolution in political development
Each of the following is a basic standard for judging scientific theories, except
A. Claims are normative
B. Assumptions and axioms are clearly separated from propositions and hypotheses
C. Claims can be verified
D. Claims provide general explanation and add to existing knowledge
claims are normative
Deduction refers to the process of drawing and inference from a set of premises and observations.
False
Inductive reasoning differs from deductive reasoning because the premises do not guarantee the conclusion but instead lend support to it.
True