Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

uop crt 205 entire course,uop crt 205 entire class,uop crt 205tutorial,uop crt 205 assignment > uop crt 205 entire course > Flashcards

uop crt 205 entire course Flashcards

1
Q

UOP CRT 205 Entire Course

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-entire-course

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CRT 205 Entire Course

A

UOP CRT 205 Entire Course

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-entire-course

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 1 Assignment Supporting a Position

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-1-assignment-supporting-a-position

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

Assignment: Supporting a Position
Resource: National Public Radio (NPR) podcast: ―Florida Mulls Lethal-Injection•
Problems‖ or article ―Execution Rules Still Inhumane‖

Listen to the NPR Podcast or read the article located on the Materials tab of your student web page for Week One.•
Consider the issues raised by the question, ―Should the U.S. continue to use capital punishment?•
Post a 350- to 700-word response in which you identify the question’s principal issues.•
Be sure to:
o Choose a position on capital punishment and support your position in your response.
o Support your position with facts about capital punishment.

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 1 Assignment Supporting a Position

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-1-assignment-supporting-a-position

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 1 CheckPoint Taking a Position

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-1-checkpoint-taking-a-position

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CheckPoint: Taking a Position Axia College uses this definition of critical thinking, originally coined by the NCTE Committee on Critical Thinking and the Language Arts: Critical thinking is ―a process which stresses an attitude of suspended judgment, incorporates logical inquiry and problem solving, and leads to an evaluative decision or action.‖
Reference
Tama, M.C. (1989). Critical thinking: Promoting it in the classroom. Retrieved October 2, 2006 from Indiana University, Clearinghouse on Reading, English, & Communication Web site: http://www.indiana.edu/~reading/ieo/digests/d40.html
Resource: Appendix B•
Due Date: Day 4 [post under 300 words total to the Individual forum]•
Read the Coffee Break comic strip in Appendix B.•
Address parts A and B in the same post•
Address the following in a100- to 150-word response in part A of the post:•
State the key issue from the comic strip.
o Does Anita suspend judgment before taking a position, or does she immediately take a position on the issue? Explain your answer.
o Does Anita use logic when looking into the issue, or is her position based on a moral value judgment? Explain your answer.
o Does she solve a problem, make a decision, or take action as a result of taking the position she did? Explain your answer.
Recall a situation in your life in which you took a• position on an issue. The issue could concern a political matter, a family or community topic, or a moral or ethical problem.
Address the following in a 100- to 150-word response in part B of the post:•
o State the issue, the position you took, and the considerations that helped you determine your position.
o Did you suspend judgment before taking a position, or did you immediately take a position on the issue? Explain your answer.
o Did you use logic when looking into the issue, or was the position you took based on a moral value judgment? Explain your answer.
o Did you solve a problem, make a decision, or take action as a result of

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 1 CheckPoint Taking a Position

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-1-checkpoint-taking-a-position

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 2 DQ 1 And DQ 2

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-2-dq-1-and-dq-2

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

DQ 1 - How does critical thinking affect you as a reader and writer? How can thinking critically improve your writing?
DQ 2 - Identify areas of vagueness and ambiguity and discuss how you could clarify the mail’s message using the writing principles addressed in the text.

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 2 DQ 1 And DQ 2

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-2-dq-1-and-dq-2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 2 Exercise Review Quizzes (Ch 1, 2, and 3)

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-2-exercise-review-quizzes-ch-1-2-and-3

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

Exercise: Review Quizzes (Ch. 1, 2, & 3)
Due Date: Day 5 [Individual forum]•
Complete the following Review Quizzes at http://www.mhhe.com/criticalthinking8•
Copy and paste your quiz results to a Microsoft® Word document.•
Post the document as an attachment. The subject line of• the post should tell the instructor which quiz you are posting (for example, Chapter 1—Claims and Arguments Quiz).

Ch. 1 Claims and Arguments Quiz
Subjectivism and Value
Judgments Quiz

Ch. 2    Vagueness Quiz
Ambiguous Claims Quiz
Defining Terms Quiz I
Writing Argumentative Essays
Quiz II

Ch. 3 Chapter Review Quiz

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 2 Exercise Review Quizzes (Ch 1, 2, and 3)

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-2-exercise-review-quizzes-ch-1-2-and-3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 3 Assignment Analyzing Credibility

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-3-assignment-analyzing-credibility

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

Assignment: Analyzing Credibility
Resources: “Giuliani Remembers 9/11‖ news clip and video ads located at one of the links listed below.•
Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]•
View and assess the credibility of these media and advertising examples:•
o The CNN Pipeline news clip located on the Materials tab of your student web page for Week Three.
o Select one of the following links to view the video ads available at that Web site:
http://www.toyota.com/corolla/demos.html•
http://www.progressive.com/commercials/progressive-commercials.aspx•
http://www.pedigree.com.au/tv/•
http://www.wendys.com/ads/•
Answer the following in regard to each of the two examples in a 100- to 200-word response:•
o Who paid for each example to be created?
o Can you detect a slant—that is, a secondary opinion conveyed by the examples’ creators?
o What does each example reflect about society at large? Is it credible? Explain your answers.
Answer the following in regard to the news clip in a 50- to 100-word response:•
o Are you skeptical of the sources’ credibility? Why or why not?
o Do you detect any bias? Why or why not?
Answer the following in regard to the video ad on one of the links above in a 100- to 200-word response:•
o Does the ad make a claim?
o What fear or desire does the ad play into?
o Does it target an existing fear or desire or does it try to create a new fear or desire?
o Does it try to invoke feeling, use admirable people to persuade, or describe a common situation?
o Would you make a purchase based on the information pres

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 3 Assignment Analyzing Credibility

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-3-assignment-analyzing-credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 3 CheckPoint Argument Credibility

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-3-checkpoint-argument-credibility

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
Due Date: Day 2 [Individual forum]•
Find a link to an online video or print news story from your favorite online news source.•
Your choice of source may range from a major news network to a small opinion magazine, and should not include YouTube or Google Video. Select a story in which claims are made and note the story title and source name. Note: If you cannot obtain a direct link to a video, write a summary of the video’s key points and provide a link to the Web site where you found the clip.
Answer the following questions in a 100- to 200-word response:•
o What claims are being made?
o Do the claims conflict with your personal observations?
o What background information do you have about the claims?
o What is the expertise of the author, if any?
o Is the author biased and untrustworthy, or unbiased and trustworthy?
Post your response and the link to your online source.•

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 3 CheckPoint Argument Credibility

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-3-checkpoint-argument-credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 4 DQ 1 And DQ 2

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-4-dq-1-and-dq-2

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

DQ 1 - Open this envelope and you’ll get a check for three million dollars, if your name appears on our list of winners.
DQ 2 - How can a person distinguish between the prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices?

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 4 DQ 1 And DQ 2

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-4-dq-1-and-dq-2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 4 Exercise Review Quizzes (Chapters 4, 5, And 6)

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-4-exercise-review-quizzes-chapters-4,-5,-and-6

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

Exercise: Review Quizzes (Chapters 4, 5, & 6)
Due Date: Day 5 [Individual forum] •
CRT 205 Critical Thinking
Course Syllabus Page 14
Resource: Review Quiz Tutorial •
Complete the following Review Quizzes at http://www.mhhe.com/criticalthinking8•
Copy and paste your quiz results to a Microsoft® Word document.•
Post the document as an attachment. The subject line of• the post should tell the instructor which quiz you are posting (for example, Chapter 1—Claims and Arguments Quiz).
Persuasion via Rhetoric Quiz I•Ch. 4
Persuasion via Rhetoric Quiz II•

Psychological Fallacies Quiz I•Ch. 5

More Fallacies Quiz I •Ch. 6
More Fallacies Quiz II•

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 4 Exercise Review Quizzes (Chapters 4, 5, And 6)

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-4-exercise-review-quizzes-chapters-4,-5,-and-6

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 5 Assignment Categorizing Fallacies

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-5-assignment-categorizing-fallacies

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

Assignment: Categorizing Fallacies
Resources: Appendix 2: The Top Ten Fallacies of All Time, Ch. 5 & 6 of Critical Thinking, and Appendix C
Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]
Complete the fallacy matrix in Appendix C.
Post Appendix C as an attachment.

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 5 Assignment Categorizing Fallacies

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-5-assignment-categorizing-fallacies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 5 Checkpoint Identifying Fallacies Checkpoint

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-5-checkpoint-identifying-fallacies-checkpoint

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
CheckPoint: Identifying Fallacies Resource: Ch. 6 End-of-Chapter Exercises and the Answers, Suggestions, and Tips for Triangle Exercises section of Critical Thinking
Complete Exercise 6-6 on pp. 194-196 of Critical Thinking. You are not required to complete questions displaying a triangle () symbol.
Copy and paste the question numbers and answers into the body of a post.

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 5 Checkpoint Identifying Fallacies Checkpoint

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-5-checkpoint-identifying-fallacies-checkpoint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 6 DQ 1 And DQ 2

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-6-dq-1-and-dq-2

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

DQ 1 - View the Vacuum Sales digital story located on aXcess for Week Six. Of the two arguments provided in this example, which is valid and which is sound? When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you, do you think it is more important to be valid or sound? Explain your answer.
Resource Required

Vacuum Salesdigital story

Grading Guide

A deductive argument can be valid even when one of its premises is false. A sound deductive argument contains true premises and a true conclusion.

The two arguments provided in the digital story are as follows:

Voice of Man Speaking for Salesman

“Anyone who wants a comfortable, clean home needs this amazing vacuum cleaner. You certainly look like someone who likes having a really clean home. So, you definitely need this vacuum cleaner!” (A valid deductive argument)

Voice of Man Speaking for Wife:

“Honey, our carpets are clean and we already have a working vacuum cleaner, so we don’t need a new one!” (A sound deductive argument)

DQ 2 - Imagine your child is trying to prove that she did not steal chocolate chip cookies from the cookie jar, so she makes this argument: “There are no chocolate stains on my hands, so I couldn’t have stolen the cookies.”

Postyour response to the following: Does this example require deductive or inductive logic? What are the premises? Are the premises stated or unstated? What is the argument’s conclusion? In your opinion, is this a convincing argument? Why or why not?

Grading Guide

Through discussion students should determine the following: The example requires inductive logic. The premises are that there are no chocolate stains on the child’s hands, and that chocolate on one’s hands is an indication of having handled chocolate chip cookies. The first premise is stated and the second premise is unstated. The conclusion is, “…so I couldn’t have stolen the cookies.”

Students should state their opinions regarding whether or not they believe the argument is persuasive.

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 6 DQ 1 And DQ 2

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-6-dq-1-and-dq-2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 6 Exercise Review Quizzes (Ch 7)

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-6-exercise-review-quizzes-ch-7

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CRT 205 Week 6 Exercise Review Quizzes (Ch 7)

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 6 Exercise Review Quizzes (Ch 7)

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-6-exercise-review-quizzes-ch-7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 7 Assignment Argument Evaluation

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-7-assignment-argument-evaluation

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

Assignment: Argument Evaluation
Resource: Appendix 1 of Critical Thinking
Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]
Read the article “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11” on pp. 456-458 of Appendix 1.
Identify at least two arguments in the article. Outline the premises and conclusions of each argument you find. Then, answer the following questions for each argument,making sure to explain how you arrived at your answers.
o Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?
o Are the arguments either deductively valid or inductively strong, or are they invalid or weak?
o Are the premises true or plausibly true, or are they difficult to prove?
Note that you may choose to evaluate invalid or weak arguments as long as you describe how they are invalid or weak.

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 7 Assignment Argument Evaluation

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-7-assignment-argument-evaluation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 7 Checkpoint Argument Validity

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-7-checkpoint-argument-validity

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

CheckPoint 1: Argument Validity Resources: Ch. 7 and the Answers, Suggestions, and Tips for Triangle Exercises section of Critical Thinking
Due Date: Day 3 [Individual forum].
Complete Exercise 7-9 on pp. 236-237 of the text.

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 7 Checkpoint Argument Validity

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-7-checkpoint-argument-validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 8 DQ 1 And DQ 2

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-8-dq-1-and-dq-2

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

DQ 1 - Describe a time when your moral values influenced the way you responded to an issue. What differences did you notice between your logical reasoning process and your moral reasoning process? What were the possible consequences or outcomes of your decision?
DQ 2 - State your stance on the Terri Schiavo case, and identify the moral value judgment that influenced you to choose your stance.
An example of a stance is, •Terri Schiavo should have been allowed to live, despite her persistent vegetative state.– An example of a moral value judgment is, •No person’s death should be decided by another—people should die naturally.
An example of moral relativism could be that American culture accepts many religious standpoints, making it difficult for its citizens to agree on the religious morality of the issue brought to light by Terri Schiavo and her family.
Moore and Parker (2007) define utilitarianism as the belief that •…if an individual can feel pleasure and pain, then he or she deserves moral consideration (p. 425). Consider that many proponents of both sides of the Shiavo case thought they had Terri’s best interests in mind—a moral consideration.
Discuss with your classmates how moral relativism and utilitarianism apply to this issue.

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 8 DQ 1 And DQ 2

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-8-dq-1-and-dq-2

17
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 8 Exercise Review Quizzes Chapter 12

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-8-exercise-review-quizzes-chapter-12

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

Exercise: Review Quizzes (Chapter 12)
Due Date: Day 5 [Individual forum] •
Resource: Review Quiz Tutorial
Complete the following Review Quiz at http://www.mhhe.com/criticalthinking8•
Copy and paste your quiz results to a Microsoft ® Word document.•
Post the document as an attachment.•
Moral Reasoning Quiz I•Ch. 12

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 8 Exercise Review Quizzes Chapter 12

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-8-exercise-review-quizzes-chapter-12

18
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 9 Capstone Checkpoint

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-9-capstone-checkpoint

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com
Capstone CheckPoint
Answer the following questions in a 100- to 200-word response. Cover each bullet point in your answer.•
o  In the future, how will thinking critically influence the ways that you:
  Read?•
  Write?•
  Process information?•
o  Why and how could you apply critical thinking when evaluating each of the following:
  Articles•
  Advertising•
  Media•
  Conversations•
A

UOP CRT 205 Week 9 Capstone Checkpoint

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-9-capstone-checkpoint

19
Q

UOP CRT 205 Week 9 Final Project Comprehensive Argument Analysis

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-9-final-project-comprehensive-argument-analysis

For more classes visit
http://www.assignmentcloud.com

Final Project: Comprehensive Argument Analysis
The Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center database at the University Library provides a wealth of arguments to which you can apply your critical thinking skills. Find this database by logging into to the Library and selecting the Article Databases—Specialized link. From the results page, scroll down to select the Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center link.
Resources: Appendix A, Appendix E, and the University Library•
Due Date: Day 7 [Individual forum]•
Choose two topics from the Opposing Viewpoints Resource• Center that interest you and locate a set of materials from the database for each topic. If you choose school violence as one of your topics, for example, you might find a magazine article that argues that violence in the media causes school violence and a Web site that persuasively argues that violence in the media is not responsible for school violence.
Conduct a similar search for your second topic. When• finished, you should have two sources per topic. Note: You may use sources from any combination of the Viewpoints, Magazines, Academic Journals, News (use sources marked Editorial and Column), and Web sites database sections.
Use the form in Appendix E to critically analyze your four sources. Fill out one form for each source.•
Provide the title of the source.
o Provide the source citation. Locate the citation by clicking on the Source Citation link at the top of the page when viewing the source.
o Identify the principal issue presented by the source.
o Identify any examples of bias presented by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
o Identify any areas that are vague or ambiguous. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
o Do you find the source credible? Explain your reasoning.
o Identify and name any rhetorical devices used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
o Identify and name any fallacies used by the author. If none exist, explain how you determined this.
o State one argument made by the author.
o Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
o Is the author’s argument valid or invalid, sound or unsound, strong or weak? Explain how you determined this.
o Does the author use moral reasoning? If not, explain how you determined this.
Post Appendix E a•

A

UOP CRT 205 Week 9 Final Project Comprehensive Argument Analysis

Check this A+ tutorial guideline at

http://www.assignmentcloud.com/crt-205/crt-205-week-9-final-project-comprehensive-argument-analysis

uop crt 205 entire course,uop crt 205 entire class,uop crt 205tutorial,uop crt 205 assignment (1 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions