Untitled Deck Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the Human Rights Act of 1998?

A

The Human Rights Act of 1998 incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into UK domestic law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does Section 2 of the Human Rights Act affect domestic courts?

A

Section 2 requires domestic courts to take into account judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, but they are not bound to follow them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does Section 3 of the Human Rights Act state?

A

Section 3 provides that primary and subordinate legislation must be read and given effect in a way that is compatible with Convention rights, as far as possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What power does Section 4(2) grant to higher courts?

A

Section 4(2) allows higher courts to declare legislation incompatible with Convention rights, but the declaration does not affect the validity of the provision. It puts pressure on the government to change the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How can the government address a declaration of incompatibility with Convention rights?

A

The government can remedy the breach by making a remedial order or by amending or repealing the offending legislation through an Act of Parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Section 6 of the Human Rights Act state regarding public authorities?

A

Section 6 makes it unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with Convention rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does the Human Rights Act apply to the courts?

A

The Human Rights Act applies to the courts as public authorities, and they must apply Convention rights in their judgments, potentially affecting relationships between private individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the significance of Section 7 of the Human Rights Act?

A

Section 7 states that a claimant can only bring proceedings for a breach of a Convention right if they are a victim of the breach, meaning they must be directly and personally affected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Can pressure groups bring claims for breach of Convention rights?

A

Generally, pressure groups cannot bring such claims. However, in exceptional cases, like the Schweiz v. Switzerland climate change case, the ECHR allowed a pressure group to represent those affected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Section 8 of the Human Rights Act allow the courts to do?

A

Section 8 allows the courts to award damages for breaches of Convention rights when necessary to afford just satisfaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does the court determine the priority of conflicting Convention rights?

A

There is no strict hierarchy of rights. The court determines priority on a case-by-case basis by analyzing the facts of the specific case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How do Articles 8 and 10 of the ECHR conflict in legal cases?

A

Article 8 protects the right to private life, while Article 10 guarantees freedom of expression. Courts often have to balance these rights, especially in cases involving celebrities and the media.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Section 12(4) of the Human Rights Act address?

A

Section 12(4) requires the courts to have particular regard to freedom of expression when considering privacy claims, and they must assess factors like public interest and whether the material is already public.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’ test?

A

The ‘reasonable expectation of privacy’ test, used in cases like Naomi Campbell, assesses whether a claimant has a reasonable expectation of privacy based on factors like their attributes, the nature of the activity, and the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In what case did the court prioritize the right to privacy over freedom of expression?

A

In the Naomi Campbell case, the court prioritized her right to privacy, considering the intrusion caused by the photograph of her leaving a Narcotics Anonymous meeting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does the court assess the balance between privacy and freedom of expression?

A

The court looks at the comparative importance of the rights in the case, considering the justification for interfering with them and the proportionality of the interference.

17
Q

What did the Von Hannover cases clarify about public figures and privacy?

A

The Von Hannover cases clarified that public figures have a right to privacy even in public places, but the publication must contribute to a genuine public debate to justify any intrusion.

18
Q

What was the outcome of the Murray case regarding privacy?

A

In the Murray case, the court assessed whether there was a reasonable expectation of privacy for the child of J.K. Rowling, and balanced it with the publisher’s right to publish.

19
Q

What did the Mosley v NGN case demonstrate about public interest?

A

The Mosley v NGN case demonstrated that the court will only allow publication of private matters if there is sufficient public interest to justify the intrusion.

20
Q

How did the Ferdinand v NGN Limited case address public interest in privacy?

A

The court ruled that there was a public interest in revealing the infidelity of England football captain Mr. Ferdinand, given that he had portrayed himself as a family man.