Unlawful act manslaughter Flashcards

1
Q

What distinguishes Unlawful Act manslaughter from murder?

A

Lack of ‘malice afterthought’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of Involuntary Manslaughter?

A

Killing someone during the course of an unlawful act without the required mens rea for murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the requirements to prove Unlawful Act (Constructive) Manslaughter?

A

Must prove the following:
* Defendant’s Act was intentional
* Defendant’s Act was unlawful
* Act was dangerous
* Act caused the death of the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does it mean for the Defendant’s Act to be intentional?

A

Must voluntarily have carried out the act but not intended the death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What characteristics must the Defendant’s Act have to be considered unlawful?

A

Must be:
* A criminal act
* An intrinsically unlawful act
* An act rather than an omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does R v Lamb state about criminal acts?

A

Criminal act must be criminal independent of the fact that it has caused death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by an intrinsically unlawful act?

A

Cannot be based on a lawful act which only becomes unlawful because of the negligent manner in which it is performed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What type of act must be involved in Unlawful Act manslaughter?

A

Must be an act rather than an omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What would a failure to do something while under duty be charged as?

A

Gross negligence manslaughter

Example case: R v Lowe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is it determined whether the act is dangerous?

A

Objective Test: Sober and reasonable people would inevitably recognize that the act subjects the other person to the risk of some (albeit not serious) harm (R v Church).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What type of harm must be considered?

A

Must be physical, not emotional harm.

(R v Dawson)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Does the type of harm foreseen have to be the harm caused?

A

No, the type of harm foreseen does not have to be the harm caused.

(R v JM & SM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What circumstances must be taken into account?

A

A reasonable person will have knowledge of the circumstances that they would have had if they had been in the accused’s shoes at the time of the offence.

(R v Dawson)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What must be accounted for during the crime?

A

Need to account for knowledge gained throughout the course of committing the crime.

(R v Watson)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What special knowledge does the reasonable person have?

A

The reasonable person will have any special knowledge which the defendant has.

(R v Farnon)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What must the unlawful act cause?

A

The unlawful act must have caused the death of the victim.

Normal rules of causation apply.

17
Q

What is factual causation?

A

Factual causation means but for the acts, the consequence would not have occurred in the way it did.

(R v White)

18
Q

What is legal causation?

A

Legal causation means the defendant must be the operating and substantial cause of the prohibited consequence.

(R v Pagett)

19
Q

What does substantial mean in legal terms?

A

Substantial means more than de minimus.

(R v Hughes)

20
Q

What does operating mean in legal terms?

A

Operating means no Novus Actus Interveniens (NAI).

21
Q

What is required for death by supplying drugs?

A

Administration of the drug by the defendant is required.

Direct injection/administration easily fits definition of manslaughter (R v Cato).

22
Q

What happens when D merely supplies drugs?

A

When D merely supplies V with drugs or assists V, D does not cause V’s death if V is a fully informed and responsible adult who freely and voluntarily self-administers.

(R v Kennedy)