Unjust Enrichment Flashcards
What is the aim of restitutionary damages
Prevent one party being unjustly enriched at the expense of another
When may a claim in restitution arise?
- Breach of contract
- No contract has come into existence
- Complete failure of consideration after money has been paid under a contract
- Party has done work / supplied goods and wants to be compensated for work done / goods provided
When can an action be brought in restitution to recover money already paid?
Can also claim damages for additional costs for replacement or work
- Payee is in breach
- Total failure of consideration (no work whatsoever)
If started work then damages for cost of cure only
When can a party bring a claim in restitution for a reasonable sum (compensation / quantum meruit) for work done / goods supplied?
As an alternative for damages
- Contract has been broken
1. Contractor started work / supplied goods
2. Other party is in breach (e.g. changed mind) - Contract was never formed
1. Both parties expected contract
2. no contract formed
3. D asks C to begin work
4. C begins work
5. D refuses to pay
Preferable to damages
Quantum Meruit (reasonable sum)
What is quantum meruit?
Reasonable sum for work done
What are Resitutionary Damages?
Remedies based on gains by D (not loss to C)
e.g. account of profits / Negotiating Damages
When will account of profits be ordered?
- Breach of contract
- C suffers no financial loss
- D makes profit at expense of C
- Exceptional circumstances (e.g. traitor)
very rare
What are negotiating damages?
Loss of opportunity to negotiate a fee for releasing a contractual restriction
e.g. breach of restrictive covenant
When are negotiating damages available?
- Breach of restrictive covenant
- Loss of opportunity to negotiate a release fee
- C suffers no clear financial loss
Remedy:
Sum C would have demanded to release D from covenant
What is the doctrine of complete performance?
Performance must be precise and exact.
Payer does not have to pay any part of price (i.e. supplier entitled to nothing) unless exception applies.
Supplier does not have to return any money already paid (e.g. deposit) unless complete failure of consideration.
Past payments only recoverable if complete failure of consideration
When can money be recovered under the doctrine of complete performance?
Requirements
1. Payer paid money to payee (e.g. contractor)
2. Payee is in breach of term
3. total failure of consideration (done nothing or work is useless)
Remedy
* Recovery of money paid
* damages if recovery of money doesn’t cover cost of replacement / cost of cure
Cannot reclaim past payment
Exceptions to the general rule that if performance is not precise and exact (doctrine of complete performance) the payer does not have to pay any part of the price
i.e. some payment can be recovered even if obligations not fulfilled
- Divisible Obligations
- Substantial Performance
- Wrongful Prevention of Performance
- Voluntary Acceptance of Part Performance
When can payment be recovered for past completed work under divisible obligations?
Requirements:
Agreed stage payments (payment agreed to distinct parts / stages of work)
Remedy:
* recover payment for completed stages (nothing for outstanding stages)
* customer can counter-claim and sue for damages if cost of cure + work paid for completed stages > original contract price
separate contracts: entitled to payment on completion of each stage
When can payment be recovered for past work under substantial performance?
i.e. contractor wants paying as finished work but minor snags
Requirements:
1. Work is finished
2. Only slightly defective (taking into account nature of defect (fufil primary purpose) + cost of cure)
3. Cost of cure is not more than 1/14 (0.07) contract price
Remedy:
Balance of contract price - cost of cure
Contractor entitled to be paid balance - cost of cure
When can payment be recovered for past work under wrongful prevention?
e.g. customer tells builder to leave as changed mind
Requirements:
1. Customer stops contractor completing obligations (not contractor’s fault incomplete)
2. Contractor has not committed a repudiatory breach (breached a condition or serious breach of innominate term)
*NOTE: if customer claims terminated because work is defective can claim breach of s13 (reaosonable skill). But can only terminate if deprived them of whole benefit. *
Remedy:
* Damages (contract price - expenses saved); or
* Quantum meruit (reasonable amount)
Damages preferable as all losses subject to mitigation