Unit1: Contextual analysis of the employment relationship Flashcards
What is labour/employment relationship concerned with?
Labour/employment Relations is concerned with people who, because of their mutual involvement in the work situation, have been placed in a specific relationship with one
another.
How does employment relationship differs from other relationships?
- While it has similarities with other relationships, the employment relationship differs from other relationships in that it has an economic base, is often impersonal, and is marked by negative attitudes on both sides. As a result it may be more complex than other relationships.
- The major distinguishing feature of this relationship is the fact that it arises from the need for economic activity in society and from man’s need to work and to earn a living
■ The societal and individual importance of the relationship
■ The depersonalized and mostly collective nature of the relationship itself.
How can labor/employment relationship be improved?
■ mutual interests
■ mutual support
■ understanding trust
■ meaningful communication
■ shared goals and shared values.
True or false
The employment relationship is not multilayered
and dynamic.
False
The employment relationship is multilayered and dynamic. It changes as the status, needs, attitudes and perceptions of the parties change and as society itself evolves.
True or False
Modern society is economically based.
True
Why is attitudes to the employment relationships are not always positive?
- This originally arose from traditional attitudes to work and to workers
- From the problems which came with industrialization and mass production.
Why don’t parties of the employment relationship do not usually display that sense of partnership, closeness and mutual commitment found in most other relationships?
This stems from the almost involuntary and impersonal nature of the relationship.
True or False
An employee does not seek work with a particular employer because he likes that employer or because he is in any way committed to the undertaking, (although this may later occur).
True, Essentially, he takes a job and enters the relationship merely to fulfil other, more personal, needs.
Are employers interested in the individuality of the worker or in his unique characteristics as a human being different from
all other human beings?
No, but merely in his ability to perform the work required
Discuss the complexity of the labour relationship
- The relationship itself and the manner in which it is conducted are of immense importance to the individual and to society, yet both parties approach the relationship and each other with a certain amount of negativity and indifference. It is also a relationship in which perceptions of collectivity, from both sides, play an important role.
- The result is that personal identities are lost in the anonymity of the collective.
How can the complexity of the labour relationship be solved?
Only the assertion of, and respect for, individuality can lead to personal satisfaction and meaningful relationships.
How is the labor/employment relationship traditionally descirbed?
As a tripartite relationship between employers, employees and the State.
What is a primary relationship?
Relationship between the employer and employee
State the secondary relationship
The relationship with the State forms the secondary relationship
Discuss the traditional employer and employee roles
Traditionally, the employer, owner or entrepreneur plans, decides, directs and controls, while the employee executes the orders of the owner, takes no part in decision-making or planning, and is not concerned with the results of his actions.
Explain “employer prerogative”
Traditional employer and employee roles which are still accepted and upheld by most participants in the employment relationship,
In most societies the State provides something.
Disclose them
At minimum legal protection to the parties in the relationship and, if necessary, establish a framework for the peaceful conduct of the relationship.
Describe the employment relationship between the union as party to the employment/labor relationship?
The employment relationship is also, at times, described as a management-union relationship or, less frequently, as a relationship between an employer organisation and a union or unions.
True or False
Unions played/play an important role in traditional labour/employment relations, but may not always be essential to the employment relationships
True
State the various factors impacting on interactions between the Parties
The extent to which the parties acknowledge that they have common interests and agree to cooperate with one another:
■ The level of conflict in the relationship and the emphasis placed on collective bargaining
■ The distribution of power between the parties and the type of power applied
■ The degree to which participants, and union members in particular, are free to make their own decisions versus their allegiance to the collective.
What are the common interests and interdependence of the tripartite relationships?
- The employer, in order to produce certain goods or services and to reap the intended profits, creates work for the employee who, in turn, accepts the work
in order to gain remuneration, status and/or personal satisfaction. - Consequently, both are interdependent, and both should be interested in advancing the work process to the highest possible level of efficiency as both will (or should) reap the benefits of continued profitability.
Why is harmony and mutual support not present in employment/labor relationship?
■ First, employees in particular do not see themselves as having anything in common with the employer or manager, this view is the result of their traditionally assigned roles and behaviour within these roles, the negativity in the relationship, the polarisation between the parties and the perception of unequal reward.
■ Secondly, commonality of interest is often overshadowed by conflict in personal and group goals, values, interests and ideologies, and the situation is made worse by social and political conflicts which intrude on the work situation.
■ Thirdly, the employer does not see himself as dependent on a particular employee, but on the employee’s labour – which, from the employer’s perspective, he buys and relinquishes at will.
■ Finally, and most importantly, not enough emphasis is placed on processes and structures which promote cooperation in the workplace. Instead, the emphasis has fallen on the institutionalisation of conflict. This is true of both traditional theory and its implementation in practice.
Discuss the potential for conflict in conflict and collective bargaining
The potential for conflict in the employment relationship is infinite. At its most basic level, conflict can be seen in disagreements about the division of profits and benefits.
Employees will want as much as possible in the form of wages, benefits and leisure, while the employer wants to maximise profits for payouts to shareholders, expansion and reinvestment.
What does conflict centres in terms of potential for conflict?
■ Accountability structures
■ Flexibility and control
■ A conflict of personal values and goals, beliefs and ideologies.
■ Role and status definition
■ Decision-making powers
True or False
Collective bargaining prevents one party to the relationship from pursuing his own interest at all costs, and thus prevents conflict from reaching unmanageable proportions.
True, but, it can be argued that too much emphasis is placed on collective bargaining as the most preferred method of resolving conflict
What is the results of collective bargaining, particularly distributive bargaining?
- Compromise solutions and very often in a win–lose or lose–lose result.
- By contrast, it is generally accepted that integrative problem-solving, relying on a large measure of cooperation, is a far superior method of resolving conflict, since it usually results in a win– win solution, which is more universally acceptable
True or False
The more dependent an employer is on an employee, the more power that employee will wield over him.
True