Unit 5012 ASR unit 6

Question 1

With a changing criterion design, each sub face serves as a baseline for the following phase. True or false true

Answer 1

True

Question 2

The changing criterion most closely resembles what other experiment the arrangement?

Answer 2

AB design

Question 3

With a changing criterion design each subphase is designed to be further away from the Target goal. True or false

Answer 3

False

Question 4

With a changing criterion design, Experimental control is demonstrated when

Answer 4

The behavior conforms to each specified criterion That is introduced

Question 5

Within a changing criterion design , To rule out threats of internal validitySuch as maturation and practice effects, One can do which of the following:

Answer 5

Revert To a previous criterion

Question 6

By directional change in a changing criteriam design Is logistically most similar top

Answer 6

A reversal as in an ABA design

Question 7

When deciding the size of the initial criteria changes when using a changing criterion design, the rule of thumb is:

Answer 7

Use large changes for variable behavior, small changes if the behavior is stable.

Question 8

All of the following are advantages of the changing criterion except:

A. Treatments do not have to be withdrawn

B. All participants can receive treatment after the same ones a baseline.

C. It requires little time and effort and planning

D. It does not require multiple behaviors, participants, or settings

Answer 8

C

Question 9

For which of the following examples with one not consider the use of a change in criterion design?

a. When the target behavior is one that can be changed, increased or decreased, and a stepwise fashion

C. When the behavior is a target behavior that is already in the clients Repertoire

Answer 9

C

Question 10

Multi element designs are sometimes also known as

Answer 10

Alternating treatment designs
Simultaneous treatment designs
Concurrent schedule design
Multiple schedule design

Question 11

A multielement design is one in which

A. Rapid sequential alternation of two or more IVs

B. A baseline face is followed by a treatment phase, each run until stable

C. Following baseline, the independent variable is introduced, then withdrawn

D. Two or more independent baselines are established and the independent variable is introduced in a staggered fashion to each baseline.

Answer 11

A

Question 12

The logic of a multi element design is that each data point in a given condition should, a. Predicts future behavior, b. Serve to verify previous predictions, and c. Permits comparison against predictions made by dad in the other condition
True or false

Answer 12

True

Question 13

When using a multielement design, conditions are Counterbalanced across experimental contexts in order to ensure an equal number of sessions from each condition were conducted true or false

Answer 13

False

Question 14

Combining elements of different experimental designs can be useful in:

Answer 14

Enhancing the certainty of experimental control

Question 15

What confounding interaction has occurred if different results are obtained when a reinforcement procedure to decrease problem behavior is examined by itself relative to when it is compared to a punishment procedure in a multi element of design?

Answer 15

Multiple treatment interference

Question 16

What confounding interaction has occurred if different results are obtained during treatment when preceded by baseline versus when preceded by a different treatment?

Answer 16

Sequence Effects

Question 17

Visual inspection may disregard actual differences or changes when they are real, but minimal. Visual inspection, therefore, may minimize…, Perhaps at the expense of….

Answer 17

Type l error, type ll error

Question 18

Procedural integrity is:

Answer 18

The extent to which the IV is implemented as dictated by the research plan

Question 19

Procedural drift occurs when the independent variable, applied during later stages of an intervention, closely matches earlier implementation. True or false

Answer 19

False

It is the opposite

Question 20

Which of the following is not a way to overcome threats to procedural integrity:

a. Simplification of the IV
b. Sufficient training and practice implementing procedures
C. Simplification of the DV
D. Contingencies place on treatment Fidelity

Answer 20

Simplification of the DV

Question 21

Procedural integrity requires a very different measurement system Then what one typically uses to measure the dependent variables. Two or false

Answer 21

False

Question 22

ASR 24

Which of the following does not describe a method used to evaluate behavior in the absence of intervention or training?

a. Sequential withdrawal
b. Component analysis
c. Probes
d. Parametric analysis

Answer 22

D

Question 23

If functional analysis of problem behavior is not considered an alternating treatments design because, although there are multiple conditions, these are not treatment conditions. True or false

Answer 23

False

But this is an assessment not a treatment

Question 24

Hi levels of satisfaction in subject of a valuations always indicate a socially significant change in behavior

True or false

Answer 24

False

Question 25

What confounding interaction has occurred if different results are obtained when a reinforcement procedure to decrease problem behavior is examined by itself relative to win it is compared to a punishment procedure in a multi element design?

Answer 25

Multiple treatment interference

Question 26

What kind sounding interaction has occurred if different results are obtained during treatment when preceded by baseline versus one preceded by A different treatment

Answer 26

Sequence effects

Question 27

Visual inspection may disregard actual differences or changes when they are real, but minimal. Visual inspection, therefore may minimize ______, at the expense of___

Type one error, type to error

Type to error, type one error

Answer 27

Type one error, type two

Question 28

occurs when implementation of a procedure deteriorates over time

Answer 28

Procedural drift