unit 5 to 8 Notes/revision/Questions Flashcards
Institutions
Institutions are written and unwritten rules that govern:
- what people do when they interact in a joint project
- the distribution of the products of their joint effort
Power
The ability to do and get the things we want in opposition to the intentions of others.
The pareto criterion
According to the Pareto criterion, allocation A dominates allocation B if at least one party would be better off with A than B, and nobody would be worse off.
We say that A Pareto dominates B.
Pareto efficiency
An allocation that is not Pareto dominated by any other allocation is described as Pareto efficient
- A Pareto-efficient allocation has the property that there is no alternative technically feasible allocation in which at least one person would be better off, and nobody worse off.
Which of the following statements about the outcome of an economic interaction is correct?
A. If the allocation is Pareto efficient, then you cannot make anyone better off without making someone else worse off.
B. All participants are happy with what they get if the allocation is Pareto efficient.
C. There cannot be more than one Pareto-efficient outcome.
D. According to the Pareto criterion, a Pareto-efficient outcome is always better than an inefficient one.
A. If the allocation is Pareto efficient, then you cannot make anyone better off without making someone else worse off.
Allocations can be judged unfair because of
How unequal they are: In terms of income, for example, or subjective wellbeing. These are substantive judgements of fairness
How they came about: For example by force, or by competition on a level playing field. These are procedural judgements of fairness.
Substantive judgements
These are based on inequality in some aspect of the allocation such as:
Income: The reward in money (or some equivalent measure) of the individual’s command over valued goods and services.
Happiness: Economists have developed indicators by which subjective wellbeing can be measured.
Freedom: The extent that one can do (or be) what one chooses without socially imposed limits.
Procedural judgements
The rules of the game that brought about the allocation may be evaluated according to aspects such as:
Voluntary exchange of private property acquired by legitimate means: Were the actions resulting in the allocation the result of freely chosen actions by the individuals involved, for example each person buying or selling things that they had come to own through inheritance, purchase, or their own labour? Or was fraud or force involved?
Equal opportunity for economic advantage: Did people have an equal opportunity to acquire a large share of the total to be divided up, or were they subjected to some kind of discrimination or other disadvantage because of their race, sexual preference, gender, or who their parents were?
Deservingness: Did the rules of the game that determined the allocation take account of the extent to which an individual worked hard, or otherwise upheld social norms?
Figure 5.3 Feasible outcomes of the interaction between Angela and Bruno.
= shows Angela and Bruno’s combined feasible set, and four allocations that might result from an interaction between them.
A. If Angela has very flat indifference curves, she may prefer G to the other three allocations.
B. If Angela has very steep indifference curves, she may prefer F to the other three allocations.
C. Allocation G is the best of the four for Bruno.
D. It is possible that Angela is indifferent between G and E.
Correct answers A and E
Angela’s indifference curves are downward-sloping. If the indifference curve through G was sufficiently flat, the other three points would all lie below it.
Angela could be indifferent between G and E—one of her indifference curves could pass through both points.
Technically feasible allocations
- The biological survival constraint = If Angela does not work at all, she needs 2.5 bushels to survive (point Z). If she gives up some free time and expends energy working, she needs more food, so the curve is higher when she has less free time.
- Points below the biological survival constraint are biologically infeasible, while points above the feasible frontier are technically infeasible.
- Angela’s maximum working day = Given the feasible frontier, there is a maximum amount of work above which Angela could not survive, even if she could consume everything she produced.
- The technically feasible allocations are the points in the lens-shaped area bounded by the feasible frontier and the biological survival constraint - the middle part
Angela and Bruno’s feasible frontier, and Angela’s biological survival constraint.
Based on this figure, which of the following is correct?
A. If Angela works 24 hours she can survive.
B. There is a technically feasible allocation in which Angela does not work.
C. A new technology that boosted grain production would result in a bigger technically feasible set.
D. If Angela did not need so much grain to survive the technically feasible set would be smaller.
C = Technology that boosted grain production would increase the amount of grain that could be produced for any given number of working hours, shifting the feasible frontier up and thus expanding the technically feasible set.
- MRT of work hours into grain output=MRS of work hours into subsistence requirements
If Bruno can impose the allocation:
A. He will choose the technically feasible allocation where Angela produces the most grain.
B. His preferred choice will be where the marginal rate of transformation (MRT) on the feasible frontier equals the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) on the biological survival constraint.
C. He will not choose 8 hours of work, because the MRS between Angela’s work hours and subsistence requirements exceeds the MRT between work hours and grain output.
D. He will choose 13 hours of free time for Angela, and consume 10 bushels of grain.
B = The distance between the feasible frontier and Angela’s survival constraint, and thus Bruno’s share, is maximised where MRS = MRT.
indifference curve:
all of the allocations that have the same value for her as the reservation option. Below or to the left of the curve she is worse off than in her reservation option. Above and to the right she is better off.
reservation option
if she refuses bruno’s offer, she has this option as a backup. Z is the allocation in which angela does not work and gets only survival rations from the government.
Angela and Bruno’s feasible frontier, Angela’s biological survival constraint, and her reservation indifference curve.Based on this figure, which of the following is correct?
A. The economically feasible set is the same as the technically feasible set.
B. For any given number of hours of free time, the marginal rate of substitution on the reservation indifference curve is smaller than that on the biological survival constraint.
C. Some points are economically feasible but not technically feasible.
D. If the ration Angela gets from the government increases from 2 to 3 bushels of grain, her reservation indifference curve will be above her biological survival constraint whatever her working hours.
D = When the ration is 2 bushels, Angela’s reservation option is Z = (24, 2). If it increases to 3 bushels, her reservation option is (24, 3), which is on a higher indifference curve that lies above the survival constraint at all points. This will now be her reservation indifference curve.
Angela and Bruno’s feasible frontier, Angela’s biological survival constraint and her reservation indifference curve. B is the outcome under coercion, while D is the outcome under voluntary exchange when Bruno makes a take-it-or-leave-it offer.Looking at this graph, we can conclude that:
A. With a take-it-or-leave-it offer, Bruno’s economic rent is equal to the joint surplus.
B. Both Bruno and Angela are better off under voluntary exchange than under coercion.
C. When Bruno makes a take-it-or-leave-it offer, Angela accepts because she receives an economic rent.
D. Angela works longer under voluntary exchange than under coercion
A = Bruno’s reservation option is to receive nothing. Under voluntary exchange, Bruno receives the whole of the surplus: the amount in excess of what Angela needs to either survive or be willing to work. So this is his economic rent.
Pareto efficiency curve CD for the interaction between Angela and Bruno.Which of the following statements is correct?
A. The allocation at C Pareto dominates the one at D.
B. Angela’s marginal rate of substitution is equal to the marginal rate of transformation at all points on the Pareto efficiency curve.
C. The mid-point of CD is the most Pareto-efficient allocation.
D. Angela and Bruno are indifferent between all the points on CD, because they are all Pareto efficient.
B = The Pareto efficiency curve, by definition, joins all the economically feasible points where MRS = MRT.
D and F are the outcomes before and after the introduction of a new law that limits Angela’s work time to four hours a day while requiring a minimum pay of 4.5 bushels. Based on this information, which of the following statements are correct?
A. The change from D to F is a Pareto improvement.
B. The new outcome F is Pareto efficient.
C. Both Angela and Bruno receive economic rents at F.
D. As a result of the new law, Bruno has less bargaining power.
C and D - At F, Angela is above her reservation indifference curve and is thus receiving an economic rent. Bruno’s reservation option is to receive nothing, so the grain he receives at F is an economic rent for him.
At D, Bruno obtained rent equal to CD, and Angela obtained no rent. At F his rent is much lower. The law has increased Angela’s bargaining power and reduced Bruno’s.
Angela and Bruno are at allocation F, where she receives 4.5 bushels of grain for 4 hours of work. From the figure, we can conclude that:
A. All the points on EF are Pareto efficient.
B. Any point in the area between G, H and F would be a Pareto improvement.
C. Any point between G and D would be a Pareto improvement.
D. They would both be indifferent between all points on GH.
B = In area GHF, Angela is on a higher indifference curve than IC2, and Bruno has more grain than EF, so both are better off.
Lorenz curve for market income in the Netherlands in 2010.Which of the following is true?
A. If area A increases, income inequality falls.
B. The Gini coefficient can be calculated as the proportion of area A to area A + B.
C. Countries with lower Gini coefficients have less equal income distributions.
D. The Gini coefficient takes the value 1 when everyone has the same income.
B = This method can be used when the population is large, as it is for a whole country such as the Netherlands.
The person who receives the income left over from a firm or other people after the payment of all contractual costs (for example the cost of hiring workers and managers, paying taxes and subcontractors is called:
select one or more
a. the government
b. residual claimant
c.owners
d. taxpayers
e. empolyees
b. residual claimant
c. owner
Which of the following are reasons why employment contracts are incomplete?
Select one or more:
a.The firm cannot contract an employee not to leave.
b.The contract is unfinished.
c.The firm is unable to observe exactly how an employee is fulfilling the contract.
d.The firm cannot specify every eventuality in a contract.
A, C,D