Unit 5 - Charitable Trusts Flashcards
Re Coulthurst
Poverty does not mean destitution. Can be a persons who have to “go short”.
Re Cohen
Poverty can be in needy circumstances
Dingle v Turner
Testator directed his trustees to invest a specified sum of trust “to apply to income thereof in paying pensions of poor employees”. Means the no personal nexus requirement in poverty cases.
Re Scarisbrick
“Poor relations cases” justified even if there is a personal element as an exception
Re Bestermans (education)
(Cited within McGovern v AG)
Requirements for a charitable trust:
1. The subject matter is useful
2. The knowledge is acquired as a result of research and publishings
3. The trust will benefit a large section of the public
Re Shaw
Shaw wrote trust into his will to create and publish his new alphabet. Held: not charitable as the purpose was not educational - missing the aspect of teaching
McGovern v AG
Amnesty international trust had a purpose trust for abolishment of capital punishment and torture. Held: not charitable - as it was for the purpose of seeking to alter the laws or persuading a country’s government and it was political in nature - not allowed
Re Compton (education)
Education for a small beneficiaries is not charitable
Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trusts
PERSONAL NEXUS TEXT
- A trust for income to assist in providing education of children of the employees and former employees.
“The quality in which distinguished the beneficiary from other members of the community … must be a quality which does not depend on their relationship to a particular individual”
Independent schools Council v charity commission for England and Wales (education)
Private schools can still be considered a charity if there are some provisions allowing for people who cannot afford.
Thornton v Howe (religion)
A trust was established for the outspoken of publishing the writing of an author who claimed to be pregnant by the Holy Ghost held: the court said that this is child purpose and was held to extend to the public as there is no requirement of benefit. It was held to be charitable has a wide definition that allows including unusual practices.
Neville Estates v madden (religion)
A trust for a religious organisation - land was held by trustees of the synagogue promoting the Jewish religion. Held: the trust is charitable a public synagogue can be considered for the public benefit.
Re King (religionj
Trust for purposes related to religion can be charitable e.g. to maintain embellish or repair churches.
Re South place ethical Society (religion)
The trust with the promotion of ethics alone does not usually qualify under the category of religion.
Gilmore v coats (religion)
I trust deserve the purposes of a small set of Catholic nuns. Held: this was not sufficiently open to the public therefore lacks a public benefit.
Charities for advancement prevention must be open to the public and engage with the public. It cannot be a private sect.