Unit 5: Chapter 15: The Judiciary Flashcards
federalist 78
judiciary would be the least powerful branch (anti-Federalists did not agree), independence of judges needed (for rights of individuals)
judiciary
the branch of govt that resolves conflicts in the law; comprises the courts and the judges who preside over them
judicial review
The power of courts to declare laws unconstitutional.
circuit courts of appeals
the middle tier in today’s federal court structure, these courts are the intermediate federal appellate courts
courts of appeals
intermediate appellate courts in the federal system that review the application of law in previous decisions made by courts in the federal or state judicial system
common law
judge made law grounded in tradition and previous judicial decisions, instead of in legislation; the US inherited, and then built on, a system of common law from england
statutory law
Law that comes from authoritative and specific lawmaking sources, primarily legislatures but also including treaties and executive orders.
plaintiff
The party that initiates a law suit.
defendant
an individual, company, or institution sued or accused in a court of law.
civil (tort)
situation when a person’s body or property is harmed by another person’s negligence or other wrongful act, other than the violation of a contract
petitioner
party who presents a petition to the court. (in a civil case)
stare decises
A Latin phrase meaning “let the decision stand.” Most cases reaching appellate courts are settled on this principle.
constitutional law
the body of law that comes out of the courts in cases involving the interpretation of the constitution
statutes
a law enacted by congress or by state legislatures to deal with particular issues or problems, sometimes more detailed and comprehensive than the common law
US code
a compilation of all the laws passed by the US congress
jurisdiction
the authority of a court to hear a case and to resolve it, given to a court by either a constitution or a statute
federal question
a question of law based on interpretation of the US constitution, federal laws, or treaties
senatorial courtesy
An unwritten traditions whereby nominations for state-level federal judicial posts are not confirmed if they are opposed by a senator from the state in which the nominee will serve. The tradition also applies to courts of appeal when there is opposition from the nominee’s state senator.
descriptive representation
Representing constituents by mirroring their personal, politically relevant characteristics.
substantive representation
the ability of a legislator to represent the agenda or interests of a group to which he or she does not personally belong
symbolic representation
efforts of members of Congress to stand for American ideals or identify with common constituency values
solicitor general
The third-ranking officer in the Justice Department, who decides what cases the federal government will appeal from lower courts and personally approves every case the government presents to the Supreme Court.
collegial court
a court made up of a group of judges who must evaluate of case together and decide on the outcome; significant compromise and negotiation take place as members try to build a majority coalition
writ of certiorari
this is an order to a lower court to produce a certified record of a case so that the appellate court can determine whether any errors occurred during trial that warrant review of the case
concurring opinions
judicial opinion agreeing with how the majority decides the case but disagreeing with at least some of the legal interpretation or conclusions reached by the majority
legal models
judicial decision making model that focuses on legal norms and principles as the guiding force in judicial decision making, including existing precedents, relevant constitutional and statutory law, and the lawmakers’ intent
attitudinal model
judicial decision making model that claims judicial making is guided by policy and ideological preferences of individual judges
strategic model
judicial decision making model that states that the primary guide for judges is their individual policy preferences; however, their preferences are tempered by their consideration of institutional factors including the pref of congress, the pres, and other justices sitting on the collegial court, as well as concern over the legitimacy of the court system if decisions are too far afield from societal norms