Unit 4: The Supreme Court Flashcards

1
Q

What are the roles of the Supreme Court?

A

-The final court of appeal for all UK civil cases and criminal cases from England, Wales and Northern Ireland - plays an important role in the development of the UK
-Cannot consider a case unless a relevant order has been made in a lower court
-Hears appeal on arguable points of law of general public importance
-Concentrates on cases of the greatest public and constitutional importance
-Maintains and develops the role of the highest court of the UK as a reader in the common law world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Supreme Court?

A

The highest court of law in the UK judiciary branch containing 12 justices, it was established in 2009 and hears cases of all cases in England, Wales and NI and civil cases in Scotland, it establishes legal precedent, hears appeals and lays down case law where there is legal uncertainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why was it necessary to introduce a Supreme Court in 2009?

A

-The principle of separation of powers in a cornerstone for the constitution - there should be separation between those who make the laws and those who review them and judge or interpret them
-allowed the Supreme Court to be more accessible to the public because in the lords, it was less accessible to enter, allow people to understand what is being considered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What act set up the Supreme Court?

A

Constitutional reform act 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What will have happened before a civil or criminal case reaches the Supreme Court?

A

-May go through 3 other courts, an NI or Scotland case will go through their legal system e.g. magistrates court, high court or crown court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What name is given to the highest criminal court in Scotland?

A

The High Court of Justiciary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which other countries are represented by the Supreme Court?

A

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council - countries in the commonwealth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What cases will reach the Supreme Court?

A

Those who affect a lot of the public and represent a wider issue in society - those that have an impact on a large number of people - those that are considered significantly important for the nation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who is under-represented in the Supreme Court?

A

Females - lady Hale was the first who was appointed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many justices are there in the Supreme Court?

A

12

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How was the court appointed before the 2005 CRA? What were the issues with this?

A

-Previously, the senior judiciary was appointed by the monarch on the advice of the PM and Lord Chancellor
-LC would consult existing senior judges through secret soundings (informal and secretive way that judges were appointed)
-lacked transparency, undermined separation of powers and resulted in an elitist senior judiciary drawn from a limited number of people - reason behind the CRA 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did the CRA 2005 mean for the appointment process of justices?

A

-Constitutional Reform Act 2005 - meant that after October 2009, a Supreme Court judge didnt become a lord
-To be appointed you must: hold a high judicial office for at least 2 years OR be a qualifying practitioner for 15 years (someone who has a senior courts qualification)
-Vacancies filled by an ad hoc selection commission of 5 individuals unlike the JAC which makes all the other appointments to the Supreme Court (judicial appointments commission)
-The appointment process does involve the PM but their power is minimal - cannot reject names put forward by selection commission - just informed of decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How representative is the Supreme Court? What can this mean for those seeking justice?

A

-Not at all representative of the UK, only 2 women and no people of colour
-Mainly white men
-Most are still Oxbridge educated
-So, they don’t represent the UK, which can be disheartening for many especially those who must seek justice from those who have never been in a similar position to the individual that the SC is dealing with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a principle? With an example?

A

-Overarching values or standards that guide judicial interpretation and decision making - its a guidelines - can influence a doctrine
-e.g. the Rule of Law - created with Magna Carta where no one is above the law
-e.g. the Principle of Proportionality - to maintain human rights so that extreme punishment cannot be given as punishment
-e.g. the Principle of Rights and Equity - justice must be served and the outcome must be intense enough to ensure justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a doctrine? Examples?

A

-established legal concepts or rules derived from precedents, statues, or constitutional principles, its a set of rules that the courts apply to all cases - ensures consistency in court cases - judges follow these doctrines unless there’s a compelling reason not to - its a rule
-e.g. the Doctrine of Precedent (stare decisis) - the UK SC adheres to previous decisions although it can depart from them if there’s interest of justice
-e.g. the Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty - courts cannot overrule parliament
-e.g. the Doctrine of Separation of Powers - allows checks and balances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who is A V Dicey and what does he say about the rule of law?

A

-A V Dicey, was a British Whig jurist and constitutional theorist - known as the author of Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution
-The rule of law is one of the twin pillars of the constitution, with the other being parliamentary sovereignty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the 3 main strands of the rule of law according to Dicey?

A
  1. No one can be punished without trial
  2. No one is above the law and all are subject to the same justice
  3. The general principles of the constitution (like personal freedoms) result from the judges decision rather than from parliamentary statute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What evidence is here that the rule of law is threatened in the UK?

A
  1. Strand 1 makes sense in theory but isn’t maintained in practice e.g. terrorists subjects have been subjects to a rage of punishments without trial under measures passed since 2001 like indefinite detentions or freezing of their assets
  2. In strand 2, the monarch, however, is above the law as well as MPs and foreign ambassadors - a number of MPs use parliamentary privilege to end legal proceedings taken against them over their expenses during the 2009 expenses scandal OR when Bojo tried to prorogue parliament to pass Brexit
  3. In strand 3, the decisions of judges like case law or commons law, certainly have a part to play in defining the UK’s constitutional arrangements, parliament remains sovereign and statue law reigns supreme - any legal precedent can be overturned by an Act of Parliament
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is judicial responsibility?

A

The principle that those in the judiciary should be free from political control - allows judges to do the right thing and apply justice properly without fear of the consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the 6 pillars that maintain judicial independence in the UK?

A
  1. Security of tenure
  2. Guaranteed salaries paid from the Consolidated Fund
  3. The offence of contempt of court
  4. Growing separation of power
  5. Independent appointments system
  6. Training and experience of senior judges
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is meant by security of tenure as a way of maintaining judicial independence in the UK?

A

-appointed for an open ended term limited only by the requirement that they must retire by the age of 75
-politician cannot seek to bring influence to bear by threatening to sack or suspend them
-members of senior judiciary can only be removed as a result of impeachment proceedings requiring a vote in both Houses of Parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is meant by guaranteed salary paid from the Consolidated Fund as a way of maintaining judicial independence in the UK?

A

-judges salaries are classified as standing services and are therefore paid automatically from the CF
-politician cannot manipulate judges salaries as a way of controlling them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is meant by the offence of contempt of court as a way of maintaining judicial independence in the UK?

A

-under sub jedice rules, the media, ministers and other individuals are presented from speaking out publicly during legal proceedings
-justice can be administered fairly without pressure from the public or a politician

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is meant by growing separation of power as a way of maintaining judicial independence in the UK?

A

-downgrading of the post of lord chancellor and the new SC enhanced separation of powers
-previously Law Lords sat in the Lords and the lord chancellor had a significant role in all 3 branches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is meant by independent appointment system as a way of maintaining judicial independence in the UK?

A

-Constitutional Reform Act 2005 saw the creation of the Judicial Appointments Commission
-greater transparency in appointments and stopped political bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is meant by training and experience of senior judges as a way of maintaining judicial independence in the UK?

A

-have a status in their chosen profession so are unlikely to defer to politicians or public opinion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Reasons why the UK judiciary has become more politicised in recent years?

A

-The Human Rights Act 1998 has drawn senior judges into the political fray by requiring them to rule on the merit of an individual piece of statute law as opposed to its application.
-The Factortame case (1990) established the precedent that UK courts can suspend Acts of Parliament where they are thought to contradict EU law
-Politicians have broken with convention by publicly criticising rulings e.g. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, David Davis, when he reacted to a 2016 High Court ruling which stated that the government could not trigger Article 50 without parliamentary approval

28
Q

Reasons why the UK judiciary has not become more politicised in recent years?

A

-The appointments process for senior judges has been made more transparent and less open to accusations of political interference through the creation of the JAC and the separate Supreme Court appointment process.
-Although ‘politicisation’ is often associated with political interference and/or control, the UK senior judiciary has, in fact, become more independent in the wake of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, such as through the downgrading of the role of lord chancellor.
-Increased conflict between judges and politicians is a positive thing because it shows that the courts are prepared to challenge the government when it appears to be encroaching upon our civil liberties.
-The fact that senior judges still benefit from security of tenure and guaranteed salaries helps to insulate them from political pressure.

29
Q

What is judicial neutrality?

A

Where judges operate impartially in the administration of justice - essential requirement in the rule of law

30
Q

What are the 4 ways how judicial neutrality is achieved?

A
  1. The relative anonymity of senior judges
  2. Restriction on political activity
  3. Legal justifications of judgments
  4. High level training
31
Q

What is meant by the relative anonymity of senior judges as a way that judicial neutrality is achieved?

A

-they have traditionally operated away from the public eyes
-until recently, judges rarely spoke on public issues of law or public policy
-senior judges are expected to avoid being drawn into open defence of their rulings

32
Q

What is meant by restriction on political activity as a way that judicial neutrality is achieved?

A

-judges arent supposed to campaign on a political party or pressure group like civil servants - but they have a right to vote
-political views shouldn’t be public

33
Q

What is meant by legal justifications of judgments as a way that judicial neutrality is achieved?

A

-senior judges must offer an explanation on how their rulings is in the law - less likely to be biased
-decisions are published in full on the courts website, along with press summaries of cases

34
Q

What is meant by high level training as a way that judicial neutrality is achieved?

A

-regulated by the Law Society and must be of high profession
-senior judges must have served for many years as a barrister and can only be put into higher ranks if they can remove bias when administering justice
-judges may be moved away from serious cases while their performance is monitored

35
Q

What are the threats to judicial neutrality?

A

-The narrow recruiting pool senior judges were drawn from - private school, Oxbridge, white, middle class, men, beyond middle age - cannot give true neutrality if their life experiences are very different to those brought before them - unrepresentative
-The Human Rigths Act 1998 led to politicisation in the judiciary - growing public profile and increased conflict between senior judges and politicians as a threat to judicial neutrality, it could be seen as a sign of growing independence

36
Q

Reasons why the SC is powerful?

A

-Investigate the highest of crimes
-Interpret the law
-Clarify law
-Highest court for all civil cases
-Represents the commonwealth
-Judicial independence
-Judicial neutrality
-More authority than the previous system

37
Q

Reasons why the SC is not powerful?

A

-Only focus on appeal
-The Parliament overrides
-They cannot rule that a piece of legislation is unlawful
-Don’t represent the population - mainly white males
-No impeachment
-EU law overrides it
-Have to be in line with the ECHR
-Judicial independence is threatened by politicisation and accountability
-Judicial neutrality id threatened

38
Q

What are the powers of the SC?

A

-Clarify the meaning of the law, especially where disputes or inconsistencies occur.
-Set legal precedents, often by reviewing earlier legal precedents and re-establishing common law.
-Review the actions of public official or public bodies to determine if they have acted lawfully.
-Determine whether ministers or state bodies have acted ultra vires, ie. Beyond the authority granted to them.
-Issuing ‘declarations of incompatibility’ under the HRA 1998 - can say that a statute doesnt fit in with the ECHR

39
Q

What is the impact of EU Law and the European Court of Justice on the Supreme Court?

A

-Since 1972, EU Laws have had precedence over UK
-Initially, the UK could be held to account at the ECJ
-Since 1990, UK courts could suspend UK statutes that appeared to be in violation of EU law
-Since Brexit, EU laws has passed into the UK legal system as Retained European Union Law (REUL)

40
Q

What is a Retained European Union Law?

A

-This means that they have passed in statute law and are therefore able to be changed by Parliament
-There is a current bill passing through that aims to repeal or replace 3800 REULs by the end of the next year

41
Q

An example of when the ECJ had an impact on Uk law?

A

-2006 - an employees company used ‘rolled-up holiday pay’ – claimed that a specific part of his wages represented holiday pay and paid him nothing when he requested holiday
-SC couldn’t reach a decision based on UK Law and sought advice from the ECJ - decided that the process of ‘rolling-up’ holiday pay was unlawful

42
Q

What is the impact of the European Convention of Human Rights on UK Law?

A

-Most articles of the ECHR are enshrined into EU Law, allowing citizens to pursue cases under the ECHR through UK courts.
-The HRA, 2008 also mirrors the ECHR as UK stature law.
-However, the ECHR alone is not superior to UK statutes.
-The Supreme Court are able to issue a declaration of incompatibility if they believe that a UK law challenges rights guaranteed – but parliament is not obliged to amend the offending statute.
-Leaving the EU will not remove the UK’s obligations to the ECHR - we are still part of it

43
Q

An example of when the ECHR had an impact on Uk law?

A

Under the Civil Partnership Act (2004), only two people of the same sex may enter into a civil partnership
Therefore different sex couples did not
In June 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that the Civil Partnership Act was incompatible with the ECHR as it applies only to same sex couples and therefore amounted to discrimination
The case saw the Supreme Court use its power of judicial review to place significant pressure on the government to change the law

44
Q

What rights has the ECHR protected?

A

-The rights that the ECHR has protected in the UK: right to a fair trial, right to privacy, freedom from torture and degrading treatment, freedom of religion, freedom from slavery, freedom from discrimination, protecting victims of domestic violence, freedom of expression

45
Q

What process was based on the ECHR?

A

The specific process based on the ECHR is the Good Friday Agreement - got peace in Northern Ireland during the times of the Troubles

46
Q

Who drafted the ECHR?

A

-UK drafted a bill of rights after war to protect Europe from abuses of power - ECHR based on this

47
Q

Which party wanted to leave the ECHR?

A

Torys

48
Q

What are substantive rights? With examples.

A

Individual rights and freedoms that an individual possesses in society granted through the Human Rights Act e.g. freedom of speech and expression (protection against state indoctrination, protection of written and spoken words, actions and any other expressive mediums)

49
Q

What are procedural rights? With examples.

A

Determine the manner of implementing substantive granted under the Human Rights Act e.g. right to a fair trial in criminal and civil cases (due process and fair, adversarial procedure, no torture or inhumane and degrading punishment)

50
Q

What did the Tory government aim to do when creating the policy of leaving the ECHR?

A

-make the UK SC the supreme judiciary not the ECHR
-they want to introduce a legal test to allow judges to block some cases

51
Q

What is an example of when the Human Rights Act was abused? Who was it highlighted by?

A

-highlighted by Raab is criminals relying on article 8 - the right to a family life - to frustrate their deportation from this country and says that these claims make up 70% of the successful human rights challenges by foreign nationals offenders appealing deportation.

52
Q

What are arguments against the Tory policy of leaving the ECHR?

A

-could be muddled and unnecessary
-they dont include proposals that would change the law concerning the potential return to other countries of migrants arriving in dinghies
-its a distraction from more pressing legal issues

53
Q

Human Rights Act. Examples and what it came from.

A

-Minimum standard of how all should be treated, basic rights to a fair trial, life, freedom from illl treatment, protection against discrimination
-it comes from the ECHR which was agreed upon by all European nations after WWII - claims of unfair treatment are dealt with by British judges rather than the ECHR
-this has been on attack from critics on the right wing that says this makes UK law inferior

54
Q

How can the UK leave the EU but doesnt have to leave the ECHR?

A

It has nothing to do with the EU

55
Q

What are arguments that say that the SC has too much power?

A

-Undermines parliamentary sovereignty - Parliament is best placed to legislate in keeping with the rule of law as it’s democratically elected, whilst ministers are held to account, judges arent. 2017 - the number of cases decided by the SC rose to a record 109 compared to 75 in 2016. In the aftermath of Brexit, the Supreme Court was seeking to assert itself in the face of an unstable parliament that lacked authority
-Policing the executives use of constitutional powers - some say that the scope of judicial activity has widened to the extent that the judiciary has policed what was traditionally seen as the executives constitutional responsibility, the present setting role that the SC played in Johnsons decision to prorogue parliament in 2019 reveals an inclination for judges to stray into territory not for the courts
-Folllowing Americas constitutional court model - US SC developed a tradition of judicial activism and self confidence over several centuries, critics of the UK SC see a rapid acceleration to the US style of SC. UK has never had separation of power clearly or codified constitution unlike the US. Weak govenrment with coalitions and not big majorities means that the judicial can assert themselves.

56
Q

Judicial review

A

The process by which the lawfulness of decisions made by central or local government, or agencies of state such as regulators, is challenged

57
Q

Why is judicial review controversial?

A

-it frequently pits the judicial branch against the government - senior judges often overturning ministerial decisions, leading to frustration
-In 2020, the former Supreme Court justice Lord Sumption argued that there was evidence of ‘excessive and inappropriate use of judicial review’ to overturn government ministers’ decisions

58
Q

Ultra vires

A

Describes an act being taken by a person or entity without legal authority to do so - ‘beyond power’ in Latin

59
Q

What is the impact of the SC on the government?

A

-Can rule that actions of the executive are incompatible with the HRA
-Government may ignore it, eg it continued to deny prisoners the vote after the Court ruled against it in 2005
-Government can use its control of Parliament (if it has a majority) to pass new legislation overruling the Court’s decision
-The Court can rule that government ministers are acting ultra vires
-Can declare the actions of the gov as unlawful e.g. Johnson and his cabinet proroguing parliament was declared unlawful

60
Q

What is the impact of the SC on the legislature?

A

-Fully independent from Parliament since 2009
-Factortame allows it to suspend some statute laws if they do not comply with EU law
-Can declare statute laws incompatible with the HRA
-Parliament remains sovereign so could repeal or amend the HRA if it chose to do so
-The Court’s judicial review in the Miller case strengthened the power of Parliament

61
Q

Miller case

A

-legal case brought by Gina Miller in 2016
-asked whether the power to invoke Article 50 to start the process for the UK to leave the EU lay with the executive or Parliament
-it was decided that Parliament should decide whether to trigger Article 50, not the executive to protect individual rights
-the Parliament did need to give its consent and the government brought forward legislation to provide the Prime Minister with the power to notify

62
Q

What is the impact of the SC on the policy making process?

A

-Laws made to comply with the HRA
-Laws made to comply with EU law (this may no longer be the case after Brexit)

63
Q

Power

A

The ability that an individual or a group of people have to influence or control the course of events with behaviour - can exist without authority like in coercive control

64
Q

Authority

A

The right to exercise one’s power legitimately and the acceptance of this exertion of power by others

65
Q

3 reasons why the SC has increased authority?

A
  1. UK SC has no more formal powers than what was held by the Appellate Committee of the Lords and the new court possess greater authority than the one before
  2. The nature of its foundation has changed the way other institutions, the media and the wider public come to view and accept its rulings
  3. Factors that enhanced authority
66
Q

What are the factors that have enhanced the authority of the SC?

A

-more independent and less opaque appointment process than law lords
-a clearer separation of powers (separation between legislative and judicial)
-an ongoing process of demystification with visits a website and media coverage

67
Q

Step by step of the SC appointment process

A

-When a vacancy arises among the Justices, the Lord Chancellor convenes an independent selection commission.
-The membership is set out in law to include: The President of the Supreme Court, Another senior UK judge (not a Supreme Court Justice), Representatives of each of the judicial appointments bodies of each nation in the UK
-The commission consults a number of senior politicians and judges across the UK
-Candidates are shortlisted against the job criteria, based on merit
-After interviews, a report is then sent to the Lord Chancellor for consideration - they then accept or reject the commission’s recommendation
-When the Lord Chancellor accepts a recommendation, the name is sent to the Prime Minister, who sends it to the King